1. Home/
  2. Services/
  3. Risk Management/
  4. Esg Risk Management/
  5. Reporting Disclosure Requirements En

Newsletter abonnieren

Bleiben Sie auf dem Laufenden mit den neuesten Trends und Entwicklungen

Durch Abonnieren stimmen Sie unseren Datenschutzbestimmungen zu.

A
ADVISORI FTC GmbH

Transformation. Innovation. Sicherheit.

Firmenadresse

Kaiserstraße 44

60329 Frankfurt am Main

Deutschland

Auf Karte ansehen

Kontakt

info@advisori.de+49 69 913 113-01

Mo-Fr: 9:00 - 18:00 Uhr

Unternehmen

Leistungen

Social Media

Folgen Sie uns und bleiben Sie auf dem neuesten Stand.

  • /
  • /

© 2024 ADVISORI FTC GmbH. Alle Rechte vorbehalten.

ADVISORI Logo
BlogCase StudiesAbout Us
info@advisori.de+49 69 913 113-01
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Comprehensive Transparency and Compliance

Reporting and Disclosure Requirements

Navigate safely through the growing requirements for sustainability and climate reporting. We support you in meeting regulatory disclosure obligations, optimizing your reporting processes, and strategically using sustainability information for your stakeholder communication.

  • ✓Compliance with relevant reporting standards (CSRD, EU Taxonomy, and other standards)
  • ✓Efficient reporting processes through optimized data collection and management
  • ✓Strategic use of sustainability information for decisions and communication
  • ✓Future-proof reporting through early adaptation to new requirements

Your strategic success starts here

Our clients trust our expertise in digital transformation, compliance, and risk management

30 Minutes • Non-binding • Immediately available

For optimal preparation of your strategy session:

  • Your strategic goals and objectives
  • Desired business outcomes and ROI
  • Steps already taken

Or contact us directly:

info@advisori.de+49 69 913 113-01

Certifications, Partners and more...

ISO 9001 CertifiedISO 27001 CertifiedISO 14001 CertifiedBeyondTrust PartnerBVMW Bundesverband MitgliedMitigant PartnerGoogle PartnerTop 100 InnovatorMicrosoft AzureAmazon Web Services

Comprehensive Support for Your Sustainability Reporting

Our Strengths

  • Comprehensive expertise in relevant reporting standards and regulatory requirements
  • Experienced team with background in sustainability reporting, financial reporting, and data management
  • Proven methods and tools for efficient data collection and report creation
  • Holistic approach that combines compliance, process optimization, and strategic value
⚠

Expert Tip

To implement CSRD requirements, companies must define clear roles in an interdisciplinary project, systematically collect ESG data, and integrate it digitally in ESEF format into the management report.

ADVISORI in Numbers

11+

Years of Experience

120+

Employees

520+

Projects

Developing and implementing effective sustainability reporting requires a structured approach that considers both regulatory requirements and the individual circumstances of your company. Our proven approach ensures that your reporting is compliant, efficient, and strategically valuable.

Our Approach:

Phase 1: Analysis - Assessment of current reporting practice, identification of regulatory requirements, and gap analysis of action needs

Phase 2: Conception - Development of a customized reporting strategy with definition of responsibilities, processes, and systems

Phase 3: Implementation - Establishment of data collection and management processes, employee training, and piloting of reporting

Phase 4: Reporting - Support in creating and quality assuring sustainability reports and regulatory disclosures

Phase 5: Optimization - Continuous improvement of reporting processes and adaptation to new regulatory developments

"Successful implementation of sustainability reporting requires a holistic ESG data architecture so that information can be systematically collected and digitally prepared in ESEF format. Through clearly defined governance processes and regular internal controls, data quality is ensured and external auditing is efficiently prepared. Only in this way does reporting become a strategic management tool in the company."
Andreas Krekel

Andreas Krekel

Head of Risk Management, Regulatory Reporting

Expertise & Experience:

10+ years of experience, SQL, R-Studio, BAIS-MSG, ABACUS, SAPBA, HPQC, JIRA, MS Office, SAS, Business Process Manager, IBM Operational Decision Management

LinkedIn Profile

Our Services

We offer you tailored solutions for your digital transformation

Regulatory Disclosure Obligations

Comprehensive support in meeting regulatory requirements for sustainability and climate reporting. We accompany you in implementing standards such as CSRD and EU Taxonomy and ensure that your reporting meets all relevant requirements.

  • Gap analyses to identify action needs according to various standards
  • Support in implementing CSRD requirements and the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS)
  • Support in implementing best practice recommendations and establishing systematic climate risk reporting
  • Support in EU Taxonomy reporting and evidence provision

ESG Data Management and Reporting Processes

Optimization of your ESG data collection and reporting processes for efficient and reliable sustainability reporting. We support you in establishing robust data processes, implementing suitable systems, and integrating into existing reporting structures.

  • Analysis and optimization of ESG data collection processes
  • Definition of data sources, responsibilities, and quality assurance measures
  • Support in selecting and implementing ESG software solutions
  • Integration of ESG reporting into existing financial and controlling processes

Sustainability Reports and Stakeholder Communication

Development of meaningful sustainability reports and strategic stakeholder communication on ESG topics. We support you in content design, target group-appropriate preparation, and strategic positioning of your sustainability performance.

  • Conception and creation of sustainability reports according to various standards
  • Support in integrating sustainability topics into corporate communication
  • Development of target group-specific communication formats for various stakeholders
  • Support in conducting stakeholder dialogues and materiality analyses

ESG Ratings and Sustainable Financing

Optimization of your ESG profile for ratings and sustainable financing instruments. We support you in preparing for ESG ratings, developing Green Bond frameworks, and meeting requirements of sustainable financial products.

  • Analysis and optimization of your ESG profile for relevant rating agencies
  • Support in developing Green Bond and Sustainability-Linked Bond frameworks
  • Support in meeting SFDR requirements for financial market participants
  • Support in communication with ESG-focused investors and financial institutions

Looking for a complete overview of all our services?

View Complete Service Overview

Our Areas of Expertise in Risk Management

Discover our specialized areas of risk management

Strategic Enterprise Risk Management

Develop a comprehensive risk management framework that supports and secures your business objectives.

▼
    • Building and Optimizing ERM Frameworks
    • Risk Culture & Risk Strategy
    • Board & Supervisory Board Reporting
    • Integration into Corporate Goal System
Operational Risk Management & Internal Control System (ICS)

Implement effective operational risk management processes and internal controls.

▼
    • Process Risk Management
    • ICS Design & Implementation
    • Ongoing Monitoring & Risk Assessment
    • Control of Compliance-Relevant Processes
Financial Risk

Comprehensive consulting for the identification, assessment, and management of market, credit, and liquidity risks in your company.

▼
    • Credit Risk Management & Rating Methods
    • Liquidity Management
    • Market Risk Assessment & Limit Systems
    • Stress Tests & Scenario Analyses
    • Portfolio Risk Analysis
    • Model Development
    • Model Validation
    • Model Governance
Non-Financial Risk

Comprehensive consulting for the identification, assessment, and management of non-financial risks in your company.

▼
    • Operational Risk
    • Cyber Risks
    • IT Risks
    • Anti-Money Laundering
    • Crisis Management
    • KYC (Know Your Customer)
    • Anti-Financial Crime Solutions
Data-Driven Risk Management & AI Solutions

Leverage modern technologies for data-driven risk management.

▼
    • Predictive Analytics & Machine Learning
    • Robotic Process Automation (RPA)
    • Integration of Big Data Platforms & Dashboarding
    • AI Ethics & Bias Management
    • Risk Modeling
    • Risk Audit
    • Risk Dashboards
    • Early Warning System
ESG & Climate Risk Management

Identify and manage environmental, social, and governance risks.

▼
    • Sustainability Risk Analysis
    • Integration of ESG Factors into Risk Models
    • Decarbonization Strategies & Scenario Analyses
    • Reporting & Disclosure Requirements
    • Supply Chain Act (LkSG)

Frequently Asked Questions about Reporting and Disclosure Requirements

What are the core requirements of the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD)?

The Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) represents a fundamental expansion and tightening of sustainability reporting in the EU. It replaces the previous Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD) and significantly expands both the scope and content requirements for reporting.

📋 Scope and Timeline:

• Large capital market-oriented companies with more than

500 employees (from fiscal year 2024)

• All large companies with more than

250 employees (from fiscal year 2025)

• Listed SMEs (from fiscal year 2026, with opt-out until 2028)
• Non-EU companies with revenue over EUR

150 million in the EU (from fiscal year 2028)

• Subsidiaries are exempt from reporting obligations if included in the group report

📊 Content Requirements:

• Reporting according to European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS)
• Double materiality: Consideration of impacts on sustainability aspects and financial impacts of sustainability aspects
• Integrated reporting in the management report (no longer possible as a separate report)
• Coverage of environmental, social, and governance topics with detailed disclosures
• Disclosure of sustainability risks and opportunities as well as transition plans
• Presentation of the entire value chain (upstream and downstream)

🔍 Audit Requirements:

• Mandatory audit of sustainability reporting (initially limited assurance)
• Transition to reasonable assurance planned in the long term
• Audit by independent third party (auditor or accredited audit body)
• Evidence of CSRD compliance in the audit opinion
• Use of specific audit standards for sustainability reporting

🌐 Digitalization Requirements:

• Digital tagging of reported information (XHTML format and iXBRL tagging)
• Integration into the European Single Access Point (ESAP) platform
• Machine-readable data to improve comparability and accessibility
• Creation of a digital taxonomy for sustainability information
• Simplification of access to sustainability information for stakeholders

How does reporting according to the EU Taxonomy work?

The EU Taxonomy is a classification system for environmentally sustainable economic activities that provides companies, investors, and policymakers with clear criteria for which economic activities can be classified as "sustainable." Reporting according to the EU Taxonomy requires a structured process for identifying, assessing, and disclosing taxonomy-aligned activities.

🏢 Scope:

• Large capital market-oriented companies with more than

500 employees

• Financial market participants offering financial products
• Future expansion under CSRD to additional companies
• Initial focus on environmental objectives, later expansion to social criteria planned
• Particular relevance for companies in sectors with high environmental relevance

🌱 The Six Environmental Objectives of the EU Taxonomy:

• Climate protection (mitigation of climate change)
• Adaptation to climate change
• Sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources
• Transition to a circular economy
• Prevention and reduction of environmental pollution
• Protection and restoration of biodiversity and ecosystems

📊 Assessment Steps for Taxonomy Alignment:

• Identification of taxonomy-eligible activities based on NACE codes and Taxonomy Regulation
• Assessment of substantial contribution to at least one environmental objective
• Ensuring no significant harm to other environmental objectives (DNSH criteria)
• Compliance with minimum social safeguards (Minimum Safeguards)
• Fulfillment of technical screening criteria for the respective activity

📈 Disclosure Obligations:

• KPIs for taxonomy-eligible and taxonomy-aligned activities
• Revenue (share from environmentally sustainable activities)
• CapEx (investments in taxonomy-aligned activities or to achieve alignment)
• OpEx (operating expenses related to taxonomy-aligned activities)
• Detailed qualitative information on assessment methodology and compliance with criteria
• Integration into the non-financial report or future sustainability report

How are TCFD recommendations implemented in reporting?

The recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) have become the global standard for reporting climate-related financial risks and opportunities. Effective implementation of TCFD recommendations enables companies to systematically identify, assess, and transparently communicate climate risks.

🏛 ️ Governance Structures:

• Presentation of the supervisory and control function of the board/supervisory board for climate topics
• Description of management responsibility for assessing and managing climate risks
• Disclosure of climate-related compensation incentives and target agreements
• Presentation of reporting lines and escalation paths for climate topics
• Integration into existing governance structures and risk management processes

🧩 Strategy and Climate Scenario Analysis:

• Identification of climate-related risks and opportunities (short, medium, and long-term)
• Presentation of impacts on business strategy, products/services, and financial planning
• Conducting climate scenario analyses for different warming paths (at least 2°C scenario)
• Assessment of the resilience of the corporate strategy under different climate scenarios
• Description of strategic adaptation measures and climate targets

⚙ ️ Risk Management Approach:

• Description of processes for identifying and assessing climate risks
• Presentation of the integration of climate risks into enterprise-wide risk management
• Explanation of processes for managing identified climate risks
• Differentiation between physical risks and transition risks
• Presentation of risk mitigation and adaptation strategies

📊 Metrics and Targets:

• Disclosure of greenhouse gas emissions according to Scope 1, 2, and relevant Scope

3 categories

• Presentation of other climate-related metrics (e.g., energy consumption, water use)
• Description of climate-related targets and target achievement
• Disclosure of the methodology and assumptions used
• Presentation of historical development and future perspectives

What challenges exist in capturing Scope 3 emissions?

Scope

3 emissions include all indirect greenhouse gas emissions along a company's value chain that do not fall under Scope 2. They account for the majority of the carbon footprint for many companies but are particularly challenging to capture and report due to their complexity and data availability.

🔄 Value Chain Complexity:

• Multitude of actors and processes in upstream and downstream activities
• Global supply chains with numerous suppliers at various levels
• Different business models and industries with specific emission profiles
• Dynamic changes in supplier relationships and product portfolios
• Overlaps and double counting between different companies

📊 Data Quality and Availability:

• Limited availability of primary emission data from suppliers and customers
• Different data quality and calculation methods among external partners
• Challenges in data collection in complex organizational structures
• Gaps in activity data for certain Scope

3 categories

• Time lag in data collection and validation

🧩 Methodological Challenges:

•

15 different Scope

3 categories according to GHG Protocol with different requirements

• Boundary problems between individual categories and to Scope

1 and 2• Uncertainties in applying emission factors and extrapolations

• Challenges in allocating emissions for shared resources
• Balance between accuracy and practical feasibility

🌐 Influence and Control:

• Limited direct control over emission sources in the value chain
• Challenges in influencing suppliers and customers
• Different influence possibilities depending on market position and industry
• Need for cooperation and partnerships for effective reduction measures
• Legal and contractual restrictions on data exchange

What is double materiality in sustainability reporting?

The concept of double materiality is a central principle in European sustainability reporting and particularly within the CSRD framework. It expands the traditional materiality concept of financial reporting with a sustainability perspective and requires consideration of materiality from two complementary perspectives.

📊 Financial Materiality:

• Focus on sustainability topics that have financial impacts on the company
• Consideration of ESG risks and opportunities with financial relevance
• Orientation to the information needs of investors and lenders
• Assessment of impacts on company value, business model, and financial performance
• Consideration of short, medium, and long-term financial effects

🌍 Environmental and Social Materiality (Impact Materiality):

• Focus on the company's impacts on environment, society, and economy
• Consideration of positive and negative external effects of business activities
• Orientation to the information needs of a broad stakeholder spectrum
• Assessment of environmental, social, and governance impacts
• Consideration of the entire value chain (upstream and downstream)

🔄 Interplay of Perspectives:

• Overlap of perspectives on many topics (dynamic materiality)
• Topics with currently only environmental/social materiality may gain financial materiality in the future
• Comprehensive consideration enables holistic understanding of risks and opportunities
• Identification of interactions between financial and non-financial aspects
• More holistic basis for strategic decisions

📋 Practical Implementation in the Reporting Process:

• Conducting a double materiality analysis with both perspectives
• Involvement of internal and external stakeholders to determine material topics
• Documentation of assessment methodology and results
• Prioritization of topics classified as material from both perspectives
• Regular review and update of the materiality analysis

How do the sustainability reporting standards ESRS, GRI, and ISSB differ?

Global sustainability reporting is shaped by various standards that have different focuses and regional areas of application. The most important are the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS), the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standards, and the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) Standards.

🇪

🇺 European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS):

• Legally binding standards within the CSRD framework for companies in the EU
• Application of the double materiality principle (financial and impact perspective)
• Comprehensive approach with detailed disclosure requirements on environmental, social, and governance topics
• Sector-specific standards complement general requirements
• Strong focus on value chain and future orientation (Transition Plans)

🌐 Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standards:

• Globally widespread, voluntary standards for sustainability reporting
• Focus on impacts of companies on economy, environment, and society (impact perspective)
• Modular structure with universal, sector-specific, and topic-specific standards
• Strong emphasis on stakeholder engagement and materiality analysis
• Established standards with long history and broad application

💰 International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) Standards:

• Global standards with focus on financial materiality for investors
• Integration into the IFRS structure (International Financial Reporting Standards)
• Emphasis on climate-related financial information and risks
• Building on TCFD recommendations and SASB standards
• Goal of global harmonization of sustainability reporting from investor perspective

📋 Important Differences and Commonalities:

• Materiality understanding: ESRS and GRI consider both perspectives, ISSB focuses on financial materiality
• Degree of obligation: ESRS is legally binding in the EU, GRI and ISSB are generally voluntary (but can become mandatory through national regulations)
• Level of detail: ESRS has very detailed requirements, GRI offers more flexibility, ISSB concentrates on investor-relevant information
• Target audience: ESRS and GRI address broad stakeholder spectrum, ISSB primarily investors and capital markets
• Harmonization efforts: Increasing convergence and mutual compatibility of standards

How do you design efficient ESG data management for reporting?

Efficient ESG data management is the foundation for reliable and high-quality sustainability reporting. With increasing regulatory requirements and growing importance of ESG information for stakeholders, a structured approach to collecting, processing, and reporting sustainability data is becoming increasingly important.

🏗 ️ Building a Robust Data Architecture:

• Development of a central ESG data platform or database
• Integration into existing enterprise systems (ERP, financial systems, etc.)
• Standardization of data formats and definitions
• Implementation of clear data governance structures and responsibilities
• Consideration of different reporting requirements of various standards

📊 Data Collection and Quality Assurance:

• Implementation of systematic processes for regular data collection
• Definition of clear data sources, collection methods, and responsibilities
• Establishment of validation and plausibility checks
• Documentation of calculation methodology and assumptions
• Implementation of four-eyes principle and clear approval processes

🔄 Process Automation and Optimization:

• Reduction of manual data entries through automation
• Development of standardized templates and collection tools
• Implementation of workflow management for data approvals
• Use of specialized ESG software and BI tools
• Continuous improvement of data collection processes

💾 Data Storage and Management:

• Secure archiving of historical ESG data for comparison purposes
• Implementation of appropriate data protection measures
• Consideration of audit trail functionalities for audit purposes
• Version control for calculation methods and factors
• Efficient management of data changes and corrections

📱 Report Creation and Tools:

• Implementation of flexible reporting tools for various frameworks
• Building a central ESG dashboard for real-time monitoring
• Integration into existing reporting processes (annual report, etc.)
• Automated generation of standardized reports
• Consideration of digital reporting formats (XHTML, iXBRL for CSRD)

What role do ESG ratings play and how can they be optimized?

ESG ratings assess the sustainability performance of companies and are gaining increasing importance for investment decisions, cost of capital, and reputation. Strategic management of ESG ratings can therefore represent a significant competitive advantage and should be an integral part of the sustainability strategy.

📈 Importance of ESG Ratings:

• Influence on investment decisions and access to capital
• Consideration in sustainable financial products and indices
• Impact on corporate reputation and stakeholder perception
• Benchmarking function in comparison to competitors
• Early indicator for emerging ESG risks and opportunities

🔍 Important ESG Rating Agencies and Their Characteristics:

• MSCI ESG: Focus on financially relevant ESG risks, strong market position
• Sustainalytics: Risk-oriented approach, broad coverage of companies
• S&P Global (formerly RobecoSAM): Corporate Sustainability Assessment (CSA), basis for Dow Jones Sustainability Index
• ISS ESG: Comprehensive ESG assessment with governance focus
• CDP: Specialization in climate, water, and forests with detailed questionnaire

⚙ ️ Optimizing ESG Rating Management:

• Analysis of own rating performance and identification of improvement potentials
• Understanding of specific methodologies and assessment criteria
• Focus on materially relevant ESG topics with high weighting
• Improvement of transparency and quality of ESG disclosures
• Proactive communication with rating agencies to clarify misunderstandings

📋 Systematic Process for Rating Optimization:

• Gap analysis: Identification of gaps and weaknesses in current assessment
• Priority setting: Focus on measures with greatest improvement potential
• Implementation planning: Development of concrete activities for performance improvement
• Communication: Ensuring transparent and complete disclosure
• Monitoring: Regular monitoring of rating development and adjustment of measures

⚠ ️ Challenges and Limitations:

• Different methodologies and results between various rating agencies
• Partial lack of transparency in assessment methods
• Differences between actual ESG performance and rating results
• Balance between rating optimization and actual sustainability improvement
• Limited resources for processing numerous rating requests

How do you develop an effective sustainability reporting strategy?

An effective sustainability reporting strategy goes beyond mere fulfillment of regulatory requirements and integrates reporting into corporate strategy, processes, and communication. A strategic approach enables synergies to be used, resources to be deployed efficiently, and the added value of reporting to be maximized.

🎯 Strategic Alignment and Goal Definition:

• Clarity about purpose and goals of reporting (compliance, stakeholder dialogue, management)
• Alignment with overarching sustainability and corporate strategy
• Identification of relevant stakeholders and their information needs
• Definition of ambition level and benchmarking with competitors
• Definition of KPIs to measure reporting success

📋 Framework and Content Design:

• Selection of relevant standards and frameworks (ESRS, GRI, ISSB, etc.)
• Conducting a well-founded (double) materiality analysis
• Definition of reporting boundaries and scope
• Establishment of a consistent reporting rhythm and process
• Development of a structured reporting concept with common thread

👥 Organizational Integration:

• Establishment of clear responsibilities and governance structures
• Integration into existing reporting processes and systems
• Building capacities and competencies in the company
• Establishment of cross-functional working groups and coordination mechanisms
• Alignment with other reporting processes (financial report, management report)

🔄 Process Design and Data Strategy:

• Development of efficient data collection and validation processes
• Implementation of suitable IT systems and tools
• Establishment of a continuous improvement process
• Building systematic quality assurance mechanisms
• Creation of a solid documentation basis for audit purposes

📣 Communication and Stakeholder Engagement:

• Development of a target group-appropriate communication strategy
• Use of various communication channels and formats
• Proactive stakeholder engagement in the reporting process
• Collection and integration of feedback for continuous improvement
• Active communication of sustainability performance and progress

What requirements does the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) place on financial market participants?

The Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) or Disclosure Regulation is a central building block of the EU Action Plan for Sustainable Finance. It establishes disclosure obligations for financial market participants and financial advisors to create more transparency about the consideration of sustainability risks and factors in investment decisions.

👥 Scope:

• Financial market participants: Asset managers, insurance companies, banks, pension funds, etc.
• Financial advisors: All advisors on financial products
• EU actors and non-EU actors offering financial products in the EU
• Different requirements depending on company size and product offering
• Phased entry into force with different implementation deadlines

📊 Disclosures at Company Level:

• Integration of sustainability risks into investment decision processes
• Principal Adverse Impact (PAI) Statement: Disclosure of main adverse sustainability impacts
• Remuneration policy in connection with consideration of sustainability risks
• Pre-contractual and regular product information on sustainability aspects
• Website disclosures on sustainability practices and policies

🏷 ️ Product Categorization and Requirements:

• Article

6 products: Conventional products without sustainability objectives

• Article

8 products ("Light Green"): Products promoting environmental or social characteristics

• Article

9 products ("Dark Green"): Products with explicit sustainability objective

• Different disclosure requirements depending on product category
• Required consistency between marketing and actual product characteristics

📝 Regulatory Technical Standards (RTS):

• Detailed requirements for disclosure of PAI indicators
• Standardized templates for pre-contractual and periodic product disclosures
• Prescribed content and presentation of sustainability information
• Disclosure of share of taxonomy-aligned investments
• Labeling of products with environmental or social characteristics

⚠ ️ Challenges and Impacts:

• Complex and detailed requirements with ongoing adjustments
• Data availability, especially for PAI indicators and taxonomy alignment
• Risk of greenwashing and regulatory scrutiny
• Increased transparency and comparability for end investors
• Shift of capital flows toward more sustainable investments

How do you conduct an effective materiality analysis for sustainability reporting?

The materiality analysis is the foundation of sustainability reporting and determines which ESG topics are relevant for the company and its stakeholders. A well-founded materiality analysis ensures that reporting focuses on the truly important topics and efficiently uses resources.

🎯 Understanding Double Materiality:

• Financial materiality (outside-in): How do sustainability topics affect the company's financial position?
• Impact materiality (inside-out): How does the company affect people and the environment?
• Consideration of both perspectives is mandatory under CSRD
• Dynamic understanding: Materiality can change over time
• Consideration of short, medium, and long-term time horizons

📋 Systematic Process for Materiality Analysis:

• Understanding context: Analysis of business model, value chain, and existing sustainability activities
• Identification of potential topics: Compilation of relevant ESG topics from various sources (standards, peer analysis, regulations)
• Assessment of impacts, risks, and opportunities: Evaluation of significance from both materiality perspectives
• Stakeholder engagement: Integration of stakeholder perspectives through surveys, interviews, workshops
• Determination of material topics: Prioritization and final determination of material topics

👥 Stakeholder Engagement:

• Identification of relevant stakeholder groups (employees, customers, investors, NGOs, etc.)
• Selection of appropriate engagement formats (surveys, interviews, workshops, panels)
• Systematic collection and documentation of stakeholder perspectives
• Consideration of stakeholder views in materiality assessment
• Transparent communication of results and consideration in reporting

📊 Documentation and Validation:

• Comprehensive documentation of methodology and process
• Transparent presentation of assessment criteria and results
• Validation of results through management and relevant committees
• Regular review and updating of materiality analysis (at least annually)
• Preparation for external audit of materiality analysis

⚠ ️ Common Challenges:

• Balancing quantitative and qualitative assessment methods
• Consideration of value chain and indirect impacts
• Dealing with data gaps and uncertainties
• Ensuring objectivity and avoiding bias
• Integration of different stakeholder perspectives

How do you prepare for the audit of sustainability reporting?

With the introduction of CSRD, sustainability reporting is subject to mandatory external audit. Preparation for this audit requires systematic documentation, robust processes, and a clear understanding of audit requirements.

📋 Audit Requirements Under CSRD:

• Initially limited assurance (similar to review), later reasonable assurance planned
• Audit of compliance with ESRS requirements
• Review of materiality analysis and reporting process
• Verification of data quality and calculation methods
• Assessment of internal control system for sustainability data

🏗 ️ Building an Audit-Ready System:

• Implementation of clear responsibilities and approval processes
• Documentation of data sources, calculation methods, and assumptions
• Establishment of internal controls for data quality
• Creation of an audit trail for all reported information
• Regular internal reviews and quality assurance measures

📊 Data Quality and Documentation:

• Systematic collection and storage of source data
• Documentation of estimation methods and assumptions
• Traceability of all calculations and conversions
• Version control for data and reports
• Archiving of evidence and supporting documents

🔄 Internal Control System (ICS):

• Definition of control activities for sustainability data
• Implementation of segregation of duties and four-eyes principle
• Regular monitoring and testing of controls
• Documentation of control design and effectiveness
• Continuous improvement of control environment

🤝 Cooperation with Auditors:

• Early involvement of auditors in preparation
• Clarification of expectations and audit approach
• Provision of necessary documents and information
• Transparent communication of challenges and limitations
• Constructive handling of audit findings and recommendations

How do you manage stakeholder expectations regarding sustainability reporting?

Different stakeholder groups have different expectations and information needs regarding sustainability reporting. Effective stakeholder management requires understanding these expectations and balancing them with the company's capabilities and strategic priorities.

👥 Important Stakeholder Groups and Their Expectations:

• Investors: Focus on financial materiality, risks, and opportunities, ESG ratings
• Customers: Interest in product sustainability, supply chain, and corporate values
• Employees: Expectations regarding working conditions, diversity, and development opportunities
• Regulators: Compliance with legal requirements and standards
• NGOs and civil society: Focus on environmental and social impacts

📊 Systematic Stakeholder Analysis:

• Identification and prioritization of relevant stakeholder groups
• Understanding specific information needs and expectations
• Analysis of communication channels and formats
• Assessment of influence and interest of different groups
• Regular review and updating of stakeholder analysis

💬 Proactive Communication Strategy:

• Clear communication of reporting approach and scope
• Transparent presentation of progress and challenges
• Regular dialogue and feedback opportunities
• Use of various communication channels (report, website, events)
• Addressing critical questions and concerns

⚖ ️ Balancing Different Expectations:

• Prioritization based on materiality and strategic relevance
• Transparent communication when expectations cannot be met
• Phased approach to expanding reporting
• Focus on continuous improvement rather than perfection
• Consideration of resource constraints and feasibility

🔄 Continuous Engagement:

• Regular surveys and feedback rounds
• Participation in industry initiatives and working groups
• Organization of stakeholder dialogues and workshops
• Integration of feedback into reporting development
• Transparent communication of how feedback was considered

How do you effectively communicate sustainability information to different target groups?

Effective communication of sustainability information requires target group-appropriate preparation and presentation of content. Different stakeholders have different information needs, levels of knowledge, and preferred communication channels.

🎯 Target Group-Specific Communication:

• Investors: Focus on financial impacts, risks, and opportunities, use of ESG metrics
• Customers: Emphasis on product sustainability and corporate values, accessible language
• Employees: Internal communication on sustainability initiatives and participation opportunities
• General public: Understandable presentation of key messages and achievements
• Experts: Detailed technical information and methodological transparency

📱 Multi-Channel Approach:

• Comprehensive sustainability report as central reference document
• Executive summary for quick overview
• Interactive online reporting with search and filter functions
• Social media for broad reach and dialogue
• Presentations and events for direct exchange

📊 Visualization and Storytelling:

• Use of graphics, infographics, and dashboards for complex data
• Storytelling to make sustainability topics tangible
• Case studies and best practices for illustration
• Videos and multimedia content for emotional access
• Balance between data and narrative

✅ Credibility and Transparency:

• Honest presentation of both progress and challenges
• Transparent communication of methodology and limitations
• Third-party verification and certifications
• Comparability through use of established standards
• Avoidance of greenwashing and unsubstantiated claims

🔄 Interactive Communication:

• Feedback opportunities and dialogue formats
• Response to questions and concerns
• Integration of stakeholder feedback
• Regular updates and progress reports
• Use of digital tools for interactive reporting

How do you integrate sustainability reporting into financial reporting?

The integration of sustainability and financial reporting is a central goal of CSRD and reflects the growing recognition that ESG factors are relevant to business success. Integrated reporting creates a holistic view of corporate performance and value creation.

🔗 Connections Between Sustainability and Financial Reporting:

• Impact of ESG factors on financial position and performance
• Consideration of sustainability risks in financial planning
• Integration of ESG metrics into management reporting
• Alignment of sustainability and financial goals
• Consistent presentation in annual report

📋 Requirements Under CSRD:

• Sustainability statement as part of management report
• Cross-references between financial and sustainability information
• Explanation of impacts of sustainability matters on financial position
• Consideration of sustainability aspects in risk reporting
• Integrated audit of financial and sustainability reporting

🏗 ️ Organizational Integration:

• Collaboration between finance and sustainability departments
• Alignment of reporting processes and timelines
• Use of common systems and data sources
• Integrated governance and approval processes
• Joint training and capacity building

📊 Content Integration:

• Presentation of business model with sustainability aspects
• Integration of ESG risks into risk management
• Consideration of sustainability in strategy and goals
• Connection of financial and non-financial KPIs
• Explanation of impacts and dependencies

💡 Benefits of Integrated Reporting:

• Holistic view of value creation and risks
• Better understanding of long-term value drivers
• Increased efficiency through aligned processes
• Improved decision-making basis for management
• Enhanced credibility and transparency for stakeholders

How do you use digital technologies for sustainability reporting?

Digital technologies offer significant opportunities to make sustainability reporting more efficient, transparent, and user-friendly. From data collection to publication, digital solutions can support the entire reporting process.

🤖 Automation and AI:

• Automated data collection from various sources
• Use of AI for data validation and plausibility checks
• Automated calculation of KPIs and metrics
• Natural Language Processing for text analysis and generation
• Machine learning for pattern recognition and forecasting

📊 ESG Data Management Platforms:

• Central platforms for collecting and managing ESG data
• Integration with existing enterprise systems (ERP, HR, etc.)
• Workflow management for data collection and approval
• Automated reporting for various standards and frameworks
• Dashboards for real-time monitoring of ESG performance

🌐 Digital Reporting Formats:

• Interactive online reports with search and filter functions
• XHTML and iXBRL formats for machine-readable reporting (CSRD requirement)
• Integration of multimedia content (videos, infographics)
• Responsive design for various devices
• Accessibility features for barrier-free access

🔗 Blockchain and Verification:

• Blockchain for transparent and tamper-proof documentation
• Digital certificates and verification of sustainability claims
• Traceability in supply chains
• Smart contracts for automated verification
• Increased trust through technological verification

📱 Stakeholder Engagement:

• Digital platforms for stakeholder dialogue
• Online surveys and feedback tools
• Social media for broad reach and interaction
• Virtual events and webinars
• Chatbots for answering frequently asked questions

How do you report on climate-related financial risks according to TCFD recommendations?

The Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) has developed a framework for reporting climate-related financial risks and opportunities. These recommendations are integrated into many reporting standards, including ESRS, and are becoming increasingly important for investors.

🏛 ️ Four Pillars of TCFD:

• Governance: Oversight and management of climate-related risks and opportunities
• Strategy: Actual and potential impacts on business model and strategy
• Risk Management: Processes for identifying, assessing, and managing climate risks
• Metrics and Targets: Metrics and targets for assessing climate performance

🌡 ️ Climate Scenario Analysis:

• Analysis of various climate scenarios (e.g., 1.5°C, 2°C, 4°C)
• Assessment of impacts on business model and strategy
• Consideration of transition risks (policy, technology, market)
• Analysis of physical risks (acute and chronic)
• Identification of opportunities from climate change

📊 Climate-Related Metrics:

• Greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1, 2, and 3)
• Carbon intensity of products and services
• Proportion of revenue from climate-friendly products
• Investments in climate protection and adaptation
• Internal carbon pricing

🎯 Climate Targets and Transition Plans:

• Setting science-based climate targets (e.g., Science Based Targets)
• Development of detailed transition plans
• Milestones and measures for achieving targets
• Monitoring and reporting on progress
• Integration into corporate strategy and planning

💰 Financial Impacts:

• Quantification of financial impacts of climate risks
• Consideration in financial planning and forecasts
• Impact on asset values and investments
• Consideration of climate risks in risk management
• Disclosure of climate-related financial impacts

What role does reporting play in Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence?

Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence (CSDD), as required by the EU Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD), requires companies to identify, prevent, and mitigate adverse impacts on human rights and the environment in their value chains. Reporting plays a central role in transparency and accountability.

📋 Reporting Requirements Under CSDDD:

• Description of due diligence processes and measures
• Identification of actual and potential adverse impacts
• Measures for prevention, mitigation, and remediation
• Effectiveness of measures and progress achieved
• Stakeholder engagement and grievance mechanisms

🔍 Due Diligence Process:

• Integration into corporate strategy and management systems
• Identification and assessment of adverse impacts
• Prevention and mitigation measures
• Establishment of grievance mechanisms
• Monitoring of effectiveness and continuous improvement

🌐 Value Chain Perspective:

• Consideration of entire value chain (upstream and downstream)
• Risk-based approach with focus on high-risk areas
• Engagement with suppliers and business partners
• Capacity building and support for suppliers
• Transparency about challenges and limitations

📊 Integration into Sustainability Reporting:

• Connection with CSRD reporting (overlapping requirements)
• Consistent presentation of due diligence activities
• Use of synergies in data collection and reporting
• Integrated governance and approval processes
• Alignment of reporting cycles

⚖ ️ Accountability and Transparency:

• Transparent communication of approach and challenges
• Reporting on concrete cases and measures
• Disclosure of grievance mechanisms and their use
• External verification and assurance
• Continuous improvement and learning from experiences

How do you prepare for future developments in sustainability reporting?

Sustainability reporting is a rapidly evolving field. New regulations, standards, and stakeholder expectations require companies to remain flexible and continuously develop their reporting. Strategic preparation for future developments is therefore essential.

🔮 Expected Developments:

• Expansion of reporting requirements (scope, depth, topics)
• Increasing harmonization of global standards (ISSB, ESRS)
• Stricter audit requirements (transition to reasonable assurance)
• Growing importance of digital and machine-readable reporting
• Increased focus on value chain and Scope

3 emissions

🏗 ️ Building Flexible Structures:

• Scalable systems and processes for data management
• Modular reporting architecture for various requirements
• Flexible IT infrastructure for new data sources
• Agile governance structures for quick adjustments
• Continuous monitoring of regulatory developments

📚 Capacity Building:

• Training and development of employees
• Building internal expertise on new topics
• Networking with experts and industry initiatives
• Participation in pilot projects and working groups
• Knowledge management and documentation of best practices

🔄 Continuous Improvement:

• Regular review and optimization of processes
• Systematic collection and integration of feedback
• Benchmarking with leading companies
• Testing of new technologies and approaches
• Proactive addressing of emerging topics

🤝 Stakeholder Engagement:

• Regular dialogue with investors and other stakeholders
• Participation in standard-setting processes
• Collaboration with industry associations
• Exchange with peers and experts
• Transparent communication of reporting development

What role does biodiversity reporting play in sustainability reporting?

Biodiversity and ecosystem services are gaining increasing importance in sustainability reporting. The loss of biodiversity is recognized as one of the greatest global challenges alongside climate change, and companies are increasingly expected to report on their impacts and dependencies.

🌿 Importance of Biodiversity:

• Biodiversity loss as systemic risk for economy and society
• Dependencies of companies on ecosystem services
• Impacts of business activities on biodiversity
• Growing regulatory requirements (EU Biodiversity Strategy, TNFD)
• Increasing investor interest in biodiversity risks

📋 Reporting Frameworks:

• ESRS E4: Biodiversity and Ecosystems (mandatory under CSRD)
• Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures (TNFD)
• Science Based Targets for Nature (SBTN)
• Global Biodiversity Framework (Kunming-Montreal)
• Integration into existing standards (GRI, CDP)

🔍 Key Reporting Elements:

• Identification of impacts and dependencies on biodiversity
• Assessment of biodiversity-related risks and opportunities
• Targets and measures for biodiversity protection
• Metrics for measuring biodiversity performance
• Governance and management of biodiversity topics

📊 Metrics and Indicators:

• Land use and changes in land use
• Impacts on protected areas and sensitive ecosystems
• Use of natural resources (water, raw materials)
• Pollution and emissions affecting biodiversity
• Positive contributions to biodiversity conservation

⚠ ️ Challenges and Solutions:

• Complexity of biodiversity assessment and measurement
• Data availability and quality, especially in value chain
• Lack of standardized metrics and methodologies
• Need for location-specific assessments
• Collaboration with experts and use of specialized tools (e.g., IBAT, ENCORE)

Success Stories

Discover how we support companies in their digital transformation

Generative KI in der Fertigung

Bosch

KI-Prozessoptimierung für bessere Produktionseffizienz

Fallstudie
BOSCH KI-Prozessoptimierung für bessere Produktionseffizienz

Ergebnisse

Reduzierung der Implementierungszeit von AI-Anwendungen auf wenige Wochen
Verbesserung der Produktqualität durch frühzeitige Fehlererkennung
Steigerung der Effizienz in der Fertigung durch reduzierte Downtime

AI Automatisierung in der Produktion

Festo

Intelligente Vernetzung für zukunftsfähige Produktionssysteme

Fallstudie
FESTO AI Case Study

Ergebnisse

Verbesserung der Produktionsgeschwindigkeit und Flexibilität
Reduzierung der Herstellungskosten durch effizientere Ressourcennutzung
Erhöhung der Kundenzufriedenheit durch personalisierte Produkte

KI-gestützte Fertigungsoptimierung

Siemens

Smarte Fertigungslösungen für maximale Wertschöpfung

Fallstudie
Case study image for KI-gestützte Fertigungsoptimierung

Ergebnisse

Erhebliche Steigerung der Produktionsleistung
Reduzierung von Downtime und Produktionskosten
Verbesserung der Nachhaltigkeit durch effizientere Ressourcennutzung

Digitalisierung im Stahlhandel

Klöckner & Co

Digitalisierung im Stahlhandel

Fallstudie
Digitalisierung im Stahlhandel - Klöckner & Co

Ergebnisse

Über 2 Milliarden Euro Umsatz jährlich über digitale Kanäle
Ziel, bis 2022 60% des Umsatzes online zu erzielen
Verbesserung der Kundenzufriedenheit durch automatisierte Prozesse

Let's

Work Together!

Is your organization ready for the next step into the digital future? Contact us for a personal consultation.

Your strategic success starts here

Our clients trust our expertise in digital transformation, compliance, and risk management

Ready for the next step?

Schedule a strategic consultation with our experts now

30 Minutes • Non-binding • Immediately available

For optimal preparation of your strategy session:

Your strategic goals and challenges
Desired business outcomes and ROI expectations
Current compliance and risk situation
Stakeholders and decision-makers in the project

Prefer direct contact?

Direct hotline for decision-makers

Strategic inquiries via email

Detailed Project Inquiry

For complex inquiries or if you want to provide specific information in advance

Latest Insights on Reporting and Disclosure Requirements

Discover our latest articles, expert knowledge and practical guides about Reporting and Disclosure Requirements

Intelligente IKS-Automatisierung mit RiskGeniusAI: Kosten senken, Compliance stärken, Audit-Sicherheit erhöhen
Künstliche Intelligenz - KI

Intelligente IKS-Automatisierung mit RiskGeniusAI: Kosten senken, Compliance stärken, Audit-Sicherheit erhöhen

October 29, 2025
5 Min.

Transformieren Sie Ihre Kontrollprozesse: Mit RiskGeniusAI werden Compliance, Effizienz und Transparenz im IKS messbar besser.

Angelo Tarda
Read
Strategische AI-Governance im Finanzsektor: Umsetzung des BSI-Testkriterienkatalogs in der Praxis
Künstliche Intelligenz - KI

Strategische AI-Governance im Finanzsektor: Umsetzung des BSI-Testkriterienkatalogs in der Praxis

October 21, 2025
5 Min.

Der neue BSI-Katalog definiert Testkriterien für AI-Governance im Finanzsektor. Lesen Sie, wie Sie Transparenz, Fairness und Sicherheit strategisch umsetzen.

Dr. Helge Thiele
Read
Neue BaFin-Aufsichtsmitteilung zu DORA: Was Unternehmen jetzt wissen und tun sollten
Risikomanagement

Neue BaFin-Aufsichtsmitteilung zu DORA: Was Unternehmen jetzt wissen und tun sollten

August 26, 2025
8 Min.

BaFin schafft Klarheit: Neue DORA-Hinweise machen den Umstieg von BAIT/VAIT praxisnah – weniger Bürokratie, mehr Resilienz.

Alex Szasz
Read
EZB-Leitfaden für interne Modelle: Strategische Orientierung für Banken in der neuen Regulierungslandschaft
Risikomanagement

EZB-Leitfaden für interne Modelle: Strategische Orientierung für Banken in der neuen Regulierungslandschaft

July 29, 2025
8 Min.

Die Juli-2025-Revision des EZB-Leitfadens verpflichtet Banken, interne Modelle strategisch neu auszurichten. Kernpunkte: 1) Künstliche Intelligenz und Machine Learning sind zulässig, jedoch nur in erklärbarer Form und unter strenger Governance. 2) Das Top-Management trägt explizit die Verantwortung für Qualität und Compliance aller Modelle. 3) CRR3-Vorgaben und Klimarisiken müssen proaktiv in Kredit-, Markt- und Kontrahentenrisikomodelle integriert werden. 4) Genehmigte Modelländerungen sind innerhalb von drei Monaten umzusetzen, was agile IT-Architekturen und automatisierte Validierungsprozesse erfordert. Institute, die frühzeitig Explainable-AI-Kompetenzen, robuste ESG-Datenbanken und modulare Systeme aufbauen, verwandeln die verschärften Anforderungen in einen nachhaltigen Wettbewerbsvorteil.

Andreas Krekel
Read
Risikomanagement 2025: BaFin-Vorgaben zu ESG, Klima & Geopolitik – Strategische Weichenstellungen für Banken
Risikomanagement

Risikomanagement 2025: BaFin-Vorgaben zu ESG, Klima & Geopolitik – Strategische Weichenstellungen für Banken

June 10, 2025
5 Min.

Risikomanagement 2025: Banken-Entscheider aufgepasst! Erfahren Sie, wie Sie BaFin-Vorgaben zu Geopolitik, Klima & ESG nicht nur erfüllen, sondern als strategischen Hebel für Resilienz und Wettbewerbsfähigkeit nutzen. Ihr exklusiver Praxis-Leitfaden.| Schritt | Standardansatz (Pflichterfüllung) | Strategischer Ansatz (Wettbewerbsvorteil) This _MAMSHARES

Andreas Krekel
Read
KI-Risiko: Copilot, ChatGPT & Co. -  Wenn externe KI durch MCP's zu interner Spionage wird
Künstliche Intelligenz - KI

KI-Risiko: Copilot, ChatGPT & Co. - Wenn externe KI durch MCP's zu interner Spionage wird

June 9, 2025
5 Min.

KI Risiken wie Prompt Injection & Tool Poisoning bedrohen Ihr Unternehmen. Schützen Sie geistiges Eigentum mit MCP-Sicherheitsarchitektur. Praxisleitfaden zur Anwendung im eignen Unternehmen.

Boris Friedrich
Read
View All Articles