MaRisk Documentation Requirements - Process and Control Descriptions
Ihr Erfolg beginnt hier
Bereit für den nächsten Schritt?
Schnell, einfach und absolut unverbindlich.
Zur optimalen Vorbereitung:
- Ihr Anliegen
- Wunsch-Ergebnis
- Bisherige Schritte
Oder kontaktieren Sie uns direkt:
Zertifikate, Partner und mehr...
MaRisk Documentation Requirements
Our Strengths
- Long-standing expertise in creating and reviewing regulatory documentation
- Proven methodology and templates for efficient documentation work
- Deep understanding of MaRisk requirements and supervisory expectations
- Holistic approach with focus on added value beyond pure compliance
⚠
Expert Insight
Well-structured process documentation is not only important for fulfilling regulatory requirements, but also serves as valuable organizational knowledge and basis for process optimization. Invest in thoughtful documentation structures that both meet MaRisk requirements and provide operational added value.
ADVISORI in Zahlen
11+
Jahre Erfahrung
120+
Mitarbeiter
520+
Projekte
We support you in creating and optimizing your process and control descriptions with a structured and efficient approach.
Unser Ansatz:
Analysis of existing documentation and identification of gaps
Development of uniform documentation standards and templates
Conducting process workshops to capture relevant information
Creation and review of process and control descriptions
Implementation of sustainable documentation maintenance
"ADVISORI's support in creating our process and control descriptions helped us not only meet MaRisk requirements, but also gain valuable insights into our processes. The structured and methodical approach significantly improved the quality of our documentation and promoted collaboration between specialist departments."
Andreas Krekel
Head of Risikomanagement, Regulatory Reporting
Expertise & Erfahrung:
10+ Jahre Erfahrung, SQL, R-Studio, BAIS- MSG, ABACUS, SAPBA, HPQC, JIRA, MS Office, SAS, Business Process Manager, IBM Operational Decision Management
Unsere Dienstleistungen
Wir bieten Ihnen maßgeschneiderte Lösungen für Ihre digitale Transformation
Development of Documentation Standards
We develop with you uniform standards and templates for your process and control descriptions that both meet MaRisk requirements and are practical.
- Analysis of regulatory requirements for documentation
- Development of customized documentation templates
- Definition of minimum content and quality standards
- Training of employees in applying the standards
Creation of Process and Control Descriptions
We support you in creating detailed and MaRisk-compliant process and control descriptions that both meet regulatory requirements and are valuable for your operational business.
- Conducting process workshops for information capture
- Structured documentation of process flows and responsibilities
- Integration of risk and control aspects
- Review and quality assurance of created documentation
Suchen Sie nach einer vollständigen Übersicht aller unserer Dienstleistungen?
Zur kompletten Service-ÜbersichtUnsere Kompetenzbereiche in Regulatory Compliance Management
Unsere Expertise im Management regulatorischer Compliance und Transformation, inklusive DORA.
DORA Digital Operational Resilience Act
Stärken Sie Ihre digitale operationelle Widerstandsfähigkeit gemäß DORA.
▼
Regulatory Transformation Projektmanagement
Wir steuern Ihre regulatorischen Transformationsprojekte erfolgreich – von der Konzeption bis zur nachhaltigen Implementierung.
▼
Häufig gestellte Fragen zur MaRisk Documentation Requirements - Process and Control Descriptions
Why are high-quality process and control descriptions crucial for MaRisk compliance and how does ADVISORI support their creation?
Well-founded process and control descriptions are not only a formal requirement of MaRisk, but a central success factor for effective risk management and fulfillment of regulatory requirements. They form the backbone of sustainable compliance management and are crucial for operational implementation of control activities.
* Regulatory significance of high-quality documentation:
•
Specific MaRisk requirement: AT 4.3.1 explicitly requires appropriate and traceable documentation of organizational structure and processes of risk management and Internal Control System.
•
Supervisory audit focus: Documentation quality is a primary focus in audits by BaFin and Bundesbank, as documentation demonstrates traceability and appropriateness of the entire risk management system.
•
Proof obligation: With missing or inadequate documentation, the regulatory principle applies: "What is not documented does not exist" - even if processes and controls function in practice.
•
Basis for effectiveness testing: Precise documentation is an indispensable foundation for testing control effectiveness by Internal Audit and external auditors.
* The ADVISORI approach for excellent documentation:
•
Methodical capture: We use structured methods and workshops to systematically capture all relevant process information and identify documentation gaps.
•
End-to-end perspective: Our documentation approaches consider the entire process chain, including interfaces and responsibilities across departmental boundaries.
•
Integrated risk-control mapping: We systematically link processes with identified risks and implemented controls to transparently demonstrate risk addressing.
•
Standardized templates: We develop customized, proven documentation templates that both meet regulatory requirements and enable efficient creation and maintenance.
•
Training and knowledge transfer: We enable your employees to independently apply and further develop the documentation methodology.
What specific minimum content must MaRisk-compliant process and control descriptions contain and how does ADVISORI ensure their completeness?
MaRisk-compliant documentation is more than a list of work steps
•
it must comprehensively and traceably represent all relevant aspects of the risk control environment. The challenge lies in balancing depth of detail and practical usability as well as consistent structuring across all process areas.
* Essential elements of MaRisk-compliant process documentation:
•
Process responsibilities: Clear naming of process owner and executing roles considering functional separation (MaRisk AT 4.3.1).
•
Process details and flows: Systematic representation of process steps, decision points, and process interfaces with defined inputs and outputs.
•
Risk assessment: Identification and assessment of process-specific risks regarding probability of occurrence and impact as well as their categorization according to MaRisk-relevant risk types.
•
Control activities: Detailed description of implemented controls including control type (preventive, detective), frequency, execution responsibility, and documentation requirements.
•
Control evidence: Definition of control evidence that must be created and retained to document control execution.
•
IT systems and data: Representation of deployed systems, interfaces, and critical data flows in process context.
•
Escalation paths: Documentation of defined escalation paths for process disruptions or control deviations.
* ADVISORI quality assurance approach:
•
Structured assessment methodology: We use a multi-stage methodology for systematic capture of all regulatorily required documentation elements.
•
MaRisk compliance check: Review of documentation against comprehensive criteria catalog directly derived from MaRisk requirements.
•
Consistency check: Ensuring uniform depth of detail and structure across all process areas.
•
Gap analysis: Systematic identification of missing documentation elements through comparison with best practice patterns and supervisory expectations.
•
Four-eyes principle: Consistent application of four-eyes principle in creating and reviewing documentation.
How can process and control documentation be efficiently integrated with the ICS and how does ADVISORI support creating seamless control evidence?
Isolated consideration of process documentation and Internal Control System (ICS) frequently leads to redundancies, inconsistencies, and inefficient control activities. Seamless integration of both elements is crucial for effective risk management according to MaRisk and creates the foundation for complete control evidence to supervision.
* Integration approach for processes and controls:
•
Risk-oriented process analysis: Systematic identification of key risks within documented processes as starting point for deriving necessary controls.
•
End-to-end control chains: Development of continuous control chains covering entire process flow and all relevant risk fields, eliminating control gaps.
•
Multi-level control architecture: Integration of Three Lines of Defense into process documentation with clear assignment of controls to corresponding defense lines.
•
Control catalog mapping: Linking process documentation with central control catalog serving as single point of truth for all ICS-relevant information.
•
Key control framework: Identification and special highlighting of key controls particularly critical for risk mitigation and requiring prioritized monitoring.
* ADVISORI approach for seamless control documentation:
•
Methodical control description: We develop standardized control descriptions consistently capturing all essential control attributes (objective, frequency, responsibility, evidence).
•
Control-risk matrix: Creation of control-risk matrices transparently representing coverage of identified risks by implemented controls.
•
Evidence management system: Design of structured system for managing control evidence ensuring traceability and auditability of control execution.
•
Control weakness tracking: Implementation of systematic process for capturing, assessing, and tracking identified control weaknesses until remediation.
•
IT-supported documentation: Consulting on selection and implementation of suitable IT solutions for integrated management of process and control documentation.
How does ADVISORI support revision of existing documentation and what best practices are applied to make it MaRisk-compliant?
Many financial institutions already have extensive process and control documentation that is often historically grown, fragmented, and not fully MaRisk-compliant. Revising this documentation requires a structured approach that preserves existing values while systematically closing regulatory gaps.
* Strategic revision approach for existing documentation:
•
Gap analysis methodology: We conduct systematic assessment of your existing documentation against current MaRisk requirements and supervisory expectations to precisely identify gaps.
•
Prioritization framework: Development of structured framework for prioritizing documentation adjustments based on regulatory criticality and operational risk.
•
Documentation optimization: Identification of redundancies, inconsistencies, and over-regulation in existing documents with goal of streamlining and focusing documentation.
•
Change impact analysis: Assessment of documentation change impacts on connected processes, controls, and IT systems to avoid unintended side effects.
•
Stakeholder management: Structured involvement of relevant specialist departments and key persons to utilize their expertise and promote acceptance of revised documentation.
* ADVISORI best practices for MaRisk-compliant documentation:
•
Modular documentation structure: Development of modular structure facilitating maintenance and updating of individual documentation components without affecting overall system.
•
Layered documentation approach: Implementation of multi-layered documentation approach with different levels of detail for various target groups (overview for management, details for operational level).
•
Process-risk-control integration: Consistent linking of process descriptions with risk assessments and control mechanisms in integrated documentation framework.
•
Governance integration: Embedding documentation in overarching governance framework with clear responsibilities for creation, quality assurance, approval, and regular review.
•
Sustainable documentation maintenance: Establishment of continuous process for regular updating and validation of documentation to permanently ensure its currency and relevance.
How can technical solutions support MaRisk-compliant process and control documentation and what criteria should be considered in their selection?
Modern technical solutions can make creation, management, and use of process and control documentation significantly more efficient and improve documentation quality and consistency. However, right selection and implementation of such tools is a critical success factor.
* Added values of technical documentation solutions:
•
Central knowledge database: Establishment of single point of truth for all process and control-related information providing consistent and current data for all stakeholders.
•
Automated versioning: Complete traceability of changes and ability to return to earlier versions, particularly important for regulatory audits.
•
Workflow integration: Integration of approval and quality assurance processes directly into documentation process to ensure compliance with four-eyes principle.
•
Real-time collaboration: Enabling simultaneous work of multiple specialist departments on same documentation, increasing efficiency and reducing silo thinking.
•
Automated consistency checks: Identification of inconsistencies, gaps, or contradictions in documentation through system-side check routines.
* Selection criteria for optimal documentation solution:
•
Regulatory compliance: Solution must be able to represent specific MaRisk documentation requirements and provide corresponding templates and check routines.
•
Process-risk-control integration: Ability to transparently represent and manage connections between processes, risks, and controls.
•
User-friendliness: Intuitive operation for specialist departments without technical background to promote acceptance and correct use.
•
Adaptability: Possibility to adapt to institution-specific processes, risk types, and control taxonomies without extensive programming work.
•
Reporting and evaluation functions: Comprehensive possibilities for creating management reports, audit documents, and regulatory evidence.
* ADVISORI support in tool selection and implementation:
•
Requirements analysis: Systematic capture of your specific requirements for documentation solution considering regulatory requirements and operational needs.
•
Market overview and pre-selection: Assessment of available solutions based on objective criteria and creation of shortlist of suitable tools.
•
Proof of concept: Conducting targeted test installations with real data to validate suitability for your specific requirements.
•
Implementation support: Support in configuration, data migration, and integration into your IT landscape.
•
Change management: Development of training concepts and support in organizational anchoring of new solution.
What special challenges do outsourcing processes pose for MaRisk-compliant documentation and how can ADVISORI support in overcoming them?
Outsourcing processes pose special requirements for process and control documentation according to MaRisk, as on one hand own responsibility continues despite outsourcing and on other hand interfaces, monitoring obligations, and exit scenarios must be documented in detail. These specific challenges require particularly careful documentation design.
* Specific documentation requirements for outsourcing processes:
•
Continued responsibility: Clear documentation of responsibility continuing despite outsourcing according to AT
9 MaRisk and its implementation in practice.
•
Control and monitoring mechanisms: Detailed description of how outsourced processes are monitored, controlled, and integrated into own risk management.
•
Interface management: Precise documentation of all technical and organizational interfaces between institution and outsourcing company.
•
Service level agreements: Documentation of agreed service levels, quality standards, and mechanisms for their monitoring.
•
Reporting: Definition and documentation of regular and event-driven reporting obligations of service provider and their integration into internal reporting structures.
•
Emergency and exit scenarios: Detailed planning and documentation of measures for service disruptions or in case of terminating outsourcing relationship.
* Typical documentation gaps in outsourcing processes:
•
Inadequate end-to-end process description: Missing continuous representation of overall process across organizational boundaries.
•
Unclear control responsibilities: Missing clear delimitation between controls to be performed by service provider and own monitoring obligations.
•
Incomplete emergency documentation: Inadequate documentation of measures for service disruptions or for insourcing case.
•
Unclear escalation paths: Missing definition of escalation procedures for problems or control failures.
•
Fragmented risk consideration: Isolated consideration of risks without integration into institution's overall risk management.
* ADVISORI solution approach for outsourcing documentation:
•
Holistic process perspective: We develop end-to-end process documentation encompassing both internal and outsourced process steps and making their interaction transparent.
•
Control taxonomy for outsourcing: Creation of specific control taxonomy for outsourced activities with clear distinction between service provider controls and own monitoring controls.
•
Interface mapping: Systematic capture and documentation of all technical, professional, and organizational interfaces between institution and service provider.
•
Integrated emergency planning: Development and documentation of comprehensive emergency and exit scenarios integrated into overarching Business Continuity Management.
•
Governance framework: Establishment of transparent governance structure for managing and monitoring outsourced activities with clear responsibilities and reporting lines.
How should sustainable lifecycle management for MaRisk-compliant process and control documentation be designed and what best practices does ADVISORI recommend?
Once-created process and control documentation quickly loses currency and relevance without systematic maintenance and regular updating. Professional lifecycle management for documentation is therefore crucial to meet continuous regulatory requirements and secure long-term operational benefit of documentation.
* Core elements of effective documentation lifecycle management:
•
Clear ownership: Unambiguous assignment of responsibility for each documentation element to process or specialist department manager as primary content owner.
•
Defined review cycles: Establishment of binding periods for regular review and updating of documentation, differentiated by criticality and change dynamics of documented processes.
•
Change management: Establishment of structured process for capturing, assessing, implementing, and communicating changes to documentation.
•
Versioning and historization: Complete traceability of all changes and ability to access earlier versions of documentation, particularly important for retrospective audits.
•
Quality assurance: Implementation of systematic quality assurance measures such as four-eyes principle for changes and regular quality audits of documentation.
* Triggers for documentation updates:
•
Regulatory changes: Adaptation to new or changed supervisory requirements such as MaRisk amendments or new BaFin circulars.
•
Organizational changes: Updating for structural changes, new responsibilities, or reorganizations.
•
Process optimizations: Follow-up for operational improvements, automation measures, or process adjustments.
•
New products or services: Extension of documentation when introducing new products, services, or business areas.
•
Control adjustments: Updating for changes in control design, new controls, or adjusted control frequencies.
•
Feedback from audits: Improvement based on findings from internal or external audits.
* ADVISORI best practices for sustainable documentation management:
•
Governance framework: Establishment of integrated governance framework for documentation management with clear roles, responsibilities, and escalation paths.
•
Automated reminders: Implementation of system for automated notification of content owners about upcoming review cycles or necessary updates.
•
Change impact analysis: Conducting systematic analysis of change impacts on other documentation elements before their implementation.
•
Integrated metadata management: Use of metadata for controlling and monitoring documentation lifecycle, including validity dates, responsibilities, and dependencies.
•
Communication and training concept: Development of concept for communicating documentation changes and training affected employees.
To what extent does high-quality MaRisk process documentation support Internal Audit and external auditors, and how does ADVISORI optimize documentation for audit purposes?
High-quality and well-structured process and control documentation is a decisive success factor for internal and external audits. It not only forms the basis for efficient audit execution but also contributes significantly to positive assessment of risk management and internal control system by auditors.
* Significance of documentation for audit processes:
•
Audit efficiency: Transparent and complete documentation enables auditors quick overview of processes and controls, reduces inquiries, and significantly shortens audit duration.
•
Traceability: Detailed process and control descriptions create transparency about "what", "who", "how", and "why" and enable auditors well-founded assessment of appropriateness and effectiveness.
•
Consistency proof: Continuous documentation demonstrates consistent implementation of regulatory requirements across all business areas and processes.
•
Control evidence: Clearly defined control evidence and their systematic retention facilitate effectiveness testing through sampling and evidence requirements.
•
Change history: Documentation of changes and their reasons enables auditors to assess adaptability of risk management to new requirements.
* Typical auditor criticism points on documentation:
•
Inconsistent depth of detail: Non-uniform detailing of documentation across different processes or organizational units.
•
Missing currency: Not updated documentation no longer corresponding to actual processes and controls.
•
Incomplete risk-control assignment: Unclear connection between identified risks and implemented controls.
•
Inadequate control descriptions: Too general or unspecific descriptions of control activities without clear execution instructions.
•
Lacking evidence management: Missing definition or inconsistent retention of control evidence.
•
Isolated documentation elements: Fragmented documentation without recognizable overall context or with contradictions between different documentation parts.
* ADVISORI approach for audit-oriented documentation optimization:
•
Bring in auditor perspective: We optimize your documentation from perspective of internal and external auditors to proactively address typical criticism points.
•
Uniform documentation framework: Development of consistent documentation structure with standardized templates for all process and control descriptions.
•
Evidence management concept: Establishment of systematic approach for defining, creating, and retaining audit-relevant evidence.
•
Risk-control matrices: Creation of transparent assignments between risks and controls with clear representation of risk addressing.
•
Audit trails: Integration of continuous audit trails into documentation ensuring end-to-end traceability of processes and controls.
•
Documentation quality assurance: Conducting systematic reviews of documentation from audit perspective before actual audits.
How can agile methods be reconciled with MaRisk documentation requirements and what approaches does ADVISORI recommend?
Integrating agile working methods with highly structured MaRisk documentation requirements presents many institutions with special challenge. However, apparent contradictions between agile flexibility and regulatory rigor can be bridged through thoughtful approach meeting both requirements.
* Challenges in combining agile methods and regulatory documentation:
•
Different basic principles: Agile methods emphasize incremental development, continuous adaptation, and minimal documentation, while MaRisk requires comprehensive and formalized documentation.
•
Temporal aspect: Agile processes are designed for rapid iterations, while regulatory documentation is typically perceived as time-consuming process.
•
Granularity and formality: Agile teams often prefer flexible, lightweight documentation forms, while supervisory requirements demand structured and formal evidence.
•
Change dynamics: Frequent changes in agile projects can lead to high effort for updating regulatory documentation.
•
Responsibilities: In agile teams, responsibility is often shared, while MaRisk requires clear individual responsibilities.
* Integration approaches for agile methods and MaRisk-compliant documentation:
•
Documentation as user stories: Integration of documentation requirements as explicit user stories or backlog items in agile project methods to treat them as equal part of development process.
•
Continuous documentation: Introduction of parallel, continuous documentation process running synchronously with agile development instead of treating documentation as downstream activity.
•
Documentation DoD (Definition of Done): Inclusion of specific documentation requirements in Definition of Done for user stories and sprints to ensure no functionality is considered complete without corresponding documentation.
•
Automated documentation generation: Use of tools for automated extraction and generation of documentation elements from code, configuration, and test cases to reduce manual documentation effort.
•
Documentation spikes: Planning dedicated periods (spikes) for consolidating and formalizing documentation after multiple development sprints.
* ADVISORI approach for agile MaRisk documentation:
•
Multi-level documentation model: We develop documentation model with different levels, from highly formalized regulatory documents to agile working documents with clear connections between levels.
•
Hybrid roles: Establishment of specialized roles (e.g., Compliance Engineer, Regulatory Product Owner) acting as bridge between agile teams and regulatory requirements.
•
Templates and checklists: Provision of adaptable documentation templates and regulatory checklists that can be directly integrated into agile workflows and tools.
•
Risk-oriented documentation approach: Focusing documentation effort on regulatorily critical aspects based on careful risk analysis to avoid unnecessary documentation.
•
Agile governance structure: Development of governance framework considering both agile principles and regulatory requirements and defining clear escalation paths for compliance topics.
What role does process and control documentation play in mergers and acquisitions, and how does ADVISORI support integration of different documentation standards?
In mergers and acquisitions (M&A) in financial sector, integration of different process and control documentation presents central challenge. Thorough analysis and methodical harmonization of documentation is crucial for successful merger and ensuring continuous MaRisk compliance in merged institution.
* Documentation-relevant challenges in M&A transactions:
•
Different documentation standards: Varying formats, levels of detail, and structural approaches in process and control documentation of involved institutions.
•
Terminological differences: Deviating terminology and taxonomies for similar processes, risks, and controls that can lead to misunderstandings and inconsistencies.
•
Regulatory approvals: Need to provide consistent and complete documentation of combined process and control landscape for supervisory approvals.
•
Process overlaps: Identification of overlaps, gaps, and contradictions in documented processes and controls of merged institutions.
•
Compliance continuity: Ensuring uninterrupted compliance with regulatory requirements during integration phase despite changing processes and responsibilities.
* Documentation-related tasks in M&A process:
•
Due diligence: Systematic analysis and assessment of quality, completeness, and compliance conformity of process and control documentation of target institution.
•
Gap analysis: Identification of differences, gaps, and overlaps between documentation standards and contents of involved institutions.
•
Target vision definition: Development of common target vision for integrated documentation landscape considering strengths of both systems and optimally meeting regulatory requirements.
•
Migration strategy: Development of structured plan for gradual harmonization or redesign of documentation with clear priorities and milestones.
•
Transition management: Ensuring continuous availability of essential documentation during transition phase, especially for critical and heavily regulated processes.
* ADVISORI support in documentation integration:
•
M&A-specific documentation due diligence: Conducting specialized due diligence focused on regulatory quality and completeness of process and control documentation of target institution.
•
Best practice synthesis: Identification and adoption of most effective documentation approaches from both organizations for target vision of integrated documentation.
•
Harmonized taxonomy: Development of uniform terminology and classification for processes, risks, and controls as foundation for integrated documentation.
•
Integration roadmap: Creation of detailed, prioritized roadmap for gradual harmonization of documentation considering operational necessities and regulatory requirements.
•
Compliance monitoring: Establishment of special monitoring system to ensure continuous MaRisk conformity during documentation integration.
Why are high-quality process and control descriptions crucial for MaRisk compliance and how does ADVISORI support their creation?
Well-founded process and control descriptions are not only a formal requirement of MaRisk, but a central success factor for effective risk management and fulfillment of regulatory requirements. They form the backbone of sustainable compliance management and are crucial for operational implementation of control activities.
* Regulatory significance of high-quality documentation:
•
Specific MaRisk requirement: AT 4.3.1 explicitly requires appropriate and traceable documentation of organizational structure and processes of risk management and Internal Control System.
•
Supervisory audit focus: Documentation quality is a primary focus in audits by BaFin and Bundesbank, as documentation demonstrates traceability and appropriateness of the entire risk management system.
•
Proof obligation: With missing or inadequate documentation, the regulatory principle applies: "What is not documented does not exist" - even if processes and controls function in practice.
•
Basis for effectiveness testing: Precise documentation is an indispensable foundation for testing control effectiveness by Internal Audit and external auditors.
* The ADVISORI approach for excellent documentation:
•
Methodical capture: We use structured methods and workshops to systematically capture all relevant process information and identify documentation gaps.
•
End-to-end perspective: Our documentation approaches consider the entire process chain, including interfaces and responsibilities across departmental boundaries.
•
Integrated risk-control mapping: We systematically link processes with identified risks and implemented controls to transparently demonstrate risk addressing.
•
Standardized templates: We develop customized, proven documentation templates that both meet regulatory requirements and enable efficient creation and maintenance.
•
Training and knowledge transfer: We enable your employees to independently apply and further develop the documentation methodology.
What specific minimum content must MaRisk-compliant process and control descriptions contain and how does ADVISORI ensure their completeness?
MaRisk-compliant documentation is more than a list of work steps
•
it must comprehensively and traceably represent all relevant aspects of the risk control environment. The challenge lies in balancing depth of detail and practical usability as well as consistent structuring across all process areas.
* Essential elements of MaRisk-compliant process documentation:
•
Process responsibilities: Clear naming of process owner and executing roles considering functional separation (MaRisk AT 4.3.1).
•
Process details and flows: Systematic representation of process steps, decision points, and process interfaces with defined inputs and outputs.
•
Risk assessment: Identification and assessment of process-specific risks regarding probability of occurrence and impact as well as their categorization according to MaRisk-relevant risk types.
•
Control activities: Detailed description of implemented controls including control type (preventive, detective), frequency, execution responsibility, and documentation requirements.
•
Control evidence: Definition of control evidence that must be created and retained to document control execution.
•
IT systems and data: Representation of deployed systems, interfaces, and critical data flows in process context.
•
Escalation paths: Documentation of defined escalation paths for process disruptions or control deviations.
* ADVISORI quality assurance approach:
•
Structured assessment methodology: We use a multi-stage methodology for systematic capture of all regulatorily required documentation elements.
•
MaRisk compliance check: Review of documentation against comprehensive criteria catalog directly derived from MaRisk requirements.
•
Consistency check: Ensuring uniform depth of detail and structure across all process areas.
•
Gap analysis: Systematic identification of missing documentation elements through comparison with best practice patterns and supervisory expectations.
•
Four-eyes principle: Consistent application of four-eyes principle in creating and reviewing documentation.
How can process and control documentation be efficiently integrated with the ICS and how does ADVISORI support creating seamless control evidence?
Isolated consideration of process documentation and Internal Control System (ICS) frequently leads to redundancies, inconsistencies, and inefficient control activities. Seamless integration of both elements is crucial for effective risk management according to MaRisk and creates the foundation for complete control evidence to supervision.
* Integration approach for processes and controls:
•
Risk-oriented process analysis: Systematic identification of key risks within documented processes as starting point for deriving necessary controls.
•
End-to-end control chains: Development of continuous control chains covering entire process flow and all relevant risk fields, eliminating control gaps.
•
Multi-level control architecture: Integration of Three Lines of Defense into process documentation with clear assignment of controls to corresponding defense lines.
•
Control catalog mapping: Linking process documentation with central control catalog serving as single point of truth for all ICS-relevant information.
•
Key control framework: Identification and special highlighting of key controls particularly critical for risk mitigation and requiring prioritized monitoring.
* ADVISORI approach for seamless control documentation:
•
Methodical control description: We develop standardized control descriptions consistently capturing all essential control attributes (objective, frequency, responsibility, evidence).
•
Control-risk matrix: Creation of control-risk matrices transparently representing coverage of identified risks by implemented controls.
•
Evidence management system: Design of structured system for managing control evidence ensuring traceability and auditability of control execution.
•
Control weakness tracking: Implementation of systematic process for capturing, assessing, and tracking identified control weaknesses until remediation.
•
IT-supported documentation: Consulting on selection and implementation of suitable IT solutions for integrated management of process and control documentation.
How does ADVISORI support revision of existing documentation and what best practices are applied to make it MaRisk-compliant?
Many financial institutions already have extensive process and control documentation that is often historically grown, fragmented, and not fully MaRisk-compliant. Revising this documentation requires a structured approach that preserves existing values while systematically closing regulatory gaps.
* Strategic revision approach for existing documentation:
•
Gap analysis methodology: We conduct systematic assessment of your existing documentation against current MaRisk requirements and supervisory expectations to precisely identify gaps.
•
Prioritization framework: Development of structured framework for prioritizing documentation adjustments based on regulatory criticality and operational risk.
•
Documentation optimization: Identification of redundancies, inconsistencies, and over-regulation in existing documents with goal of streamlining and focusing documentation.
•
Change impact analysis: Assessment of documentation change impacts on connected processes, controls, and IT systems to avoid unintended side effects.
•
Stakeholder management: Structured involvement of relevant specialist departments and key persons to utilize their expertise and promote acceptance of revised documentation.
* ADVISORI best practices for MaRisk-compliant documentation:
•
Modular documentation structure: Development of modular structure facilitating maintenance and updating of individual documentation components without affecting overall system.
•
Layered documentation approach: Implementation of multi-layered documentation approach with different levels of detail for various target groups (overview for management, details for operational level).
•
Process-risk-control integration: Consistent linking of process descriptions with risk assessments and control mechanisms in integrated documentation framework.
•
Governance integration: Embedding documentation in overarching governance framework with clear responsibilities for creation, quality assurance, approval, and regular review.
•
Sustainable documentation maintenance: Establishment of continuous process for regular updating and validation of documentation to permanently ensure its currency and relevance.
How can technical solutions support MaRisk-compliant process and control documentation and what criteria should be considered in their selection?
Modern technical solutions can make creation, management, and use of process and control documentation significantly more efficient and improve documentation quality and consistency. However, right selection and implementation of such tools is a critical success factor.
* Added values of technical documentation solutions:
•
Central knowledge database: Establishment of single point of truth for all process and control-related information providing consistent and current data for all stakeholders.
•
Automated versioning: Complete traceability of changes and ability to return to earlier versions, particularly important for regulatory audits.
•
Workflow integration: Integration of approval and quality assurance processes directly into documentation process to ensure compliance with four-eyes principle.
•
Real-time collaboration: Enabling simultaneous work of multiple specialist departments on same documentation, increasing efficiency and reducing silo thinking.
•
Automated consistency checks: Identification of inconsistencies, gaps, or contradictions in documentation through system-side check routines.
* Selection criteria for optimal documentation solution:
•
Regulatory compliance: Solution must be able to represent specific MaRisk documentation requirements and provide corresponding templates and check routines.
•
Process-risk-control integration: Ability to transparently represent and manage connections between processes, risks, and controls.
•
User-friendliness: Intuitive operation for specialist departments without technical background to promote acceptance and correct use.
•
Adaptability: Possibility to adapt to institution-specific processes, risk types, and control taxonomies without extensive programming work.
•
Reporting and evaluation functions: Comprehensive possibilities for creating management reports, audit documents, and regulatory evidence.
* ADVISORI support in tool selection and implementation:
•
Requirements analysis: Systematic capture of your specific requirements for documentation solution considering regulatory requirements and operational needs.
•
Market overview and pre-selection: Assessment of available solutions based on objective criteria and creation of shortlist of suitable tools.
•
Proof of concept: Conducting targeted test installations with real data to validate suitability for your specific requirements.
•
Implementation support: Support in configuration, data migration, and integration into your IT landscape.
•
Change management: Development of training concepts and support in organizational anchoring of new solution.
What special challenges do outsourcing processes pose for MaRisk-compliant documentation and how can ADVISORI support in overcoming them?
Outsourcing processes pose special requirements for process and control documentation according to MaRisk, as on one hand own responsibility continues despite outsourcing and on other hand interfaces, monitoring obligations, and exit scenarios must be documented in detail. These specific challenges require particularly careful documentation design.
* Specific documentation requirements for outsourcing processes:
•
Continued responsibility: Clear documentation of responsibility continuing despite outsourcing according to AT
9 MaRisk and its implementation in practice.
•
Control and monitoring mechanisms: Detailed description of how outsourced processes are monitored, controlled, and integrated into own risk management.
•
Interface management: Precise documentation of all technical and organizational interfaces between institution and outsourcing company.
•
Service level agreements: Documentation of agreed service levels, quality standards, and mechanisms for their monitoring.
•
Reporting: Definition and documentation of regular and event-driven reporting obligations of service provider and their integration into internal reporting structures.
•
Emergency and exit scenarios: Detailed planning and documentation of measures for service disruptions or in case of terminating outsourcing relationship.
* Typical documentation gaps in outsourcing processes:
•
Inadequate end-to-end process description: Missing continuous representation of overall process across organizational boundaries.
•
Unclear control responsibilities: Missing clear delimitation between controls to be performed by service provider and own monitoring obligations.
•
Incomplete emergency documentation: Inadequate documentation of measures for service disruptions or for insourcing case.
•
Unclear escalation paths: Missing definition of escalation procedures for problems or control failures.
•
Fragmented risk consideration: Isolated consideration of risks without integration into institution's overall risk management.
* ADVISORI solution approach for outsourcing documentation:
•
Holistic process perspective: We develop end-to-end process documentation encompassing both internal and outsourced process steps and making their interaction transparent.
•
Control taxonomy for outsourcing: Creation of specific control taxonomy for outsourced activities with clear distinction between service provider controls and own monitoring controls.
•
Interface mapping: Systematic capture and documentation of all technical, professional, and organizational interfaces between institution and service provider.
•
Integrated emergency planning: Development and documentation of comprehensive emergency and exit scenarios integrated into overarching Business Continuity Management.
•
Governance framework: Establishment of transparent governance structure for managing and monitoring outsourced activities with clear responsibilities and reporting lines.
How should sustainable lifecycle management for MaRisk-compliant process and control documentation be designed and what best practices does ADVISORI recommend?
Once-created process and control documentation quickly loses currency and relevance without systematic maintenance and regular updating. Professional lifecycle management for documentation is therefore crucial to meet continuous regulatory requirements and secure long-term operational benefit of documentation.
* Core elements of effective documentation lifecycle management:
•
Clear ownership: Unambiguous assignment of responsibility for each documentation element to process or specialist department manager as primary content owner.
•
Defined review cycles: Establishment of binding periods for regular review and updating of documentation, differentiated by criticality and change dynamics of documented processes.
•
Change management: Establishment of structured process for capturing, assessing, implementing, and communicating changes to documentation.
•
Versioning and historization: Complete traceability of all changes and ability to access earlier versions of documentation, particularly important for retrospective audits.
•
Quality assurance: Implementation of systematic quality assurance measures such as four-eyes principle for changes and regular quality audits of documentation.
* Triggers for documentation updates:
•
Regulatory changes: Adaptation to new or changed supervisory requirements such as MaRisk amendments or new BaFin circulars.
•
Organizational changes: Updating for structural changes, new responsibilities, or reorganizations.
•
Process optimizations: Follow-up for operational improvements, automation measures, or process adjustments.
•
New products or services: Extension of documentation when introducing new products, services, or business areas.
•
Control adjustments: Updating for changes in control design, new controls, or adjusted control frequencies.
•
Feedback from audits: Improvement based on findings from internal or external audits.
* ADVISORI best practices for sustainable documentation management:
•
Governance framework: Establishment of integrated governance framework for documentation management with clear roles, responsibilities, and escalation paths.
•
Automated reminders: Implementation of system for automated notification of content owners about upcoming review cycles or necessary updates.
•
Change impact analysis: Conducting systematic analysis of change impacts on other documentation elements before their implementation.
•
Integrated metadata management: Use of metadata for controlling and monitoring documentation lifecycle, including validity dates, responsibilities, and dependencies.
•
Communication and training concept: Development of concept for communicating documentation changes and training affected employees.
To what extent does high-quality MaRisk process documentation support Internal Audit and external auditors, and how does ADVISORI optimize documentation for audit purposes?
High-quality and well-structured process and control documentation is a decisive success factor for internal and external audits. It not only forms the basis for efficient audit execution but also contributes significantly to positive assessment of risk management and internal control system by auditors.
* Significance of documentation for audit processes:
•
Audit efficiency: Transparent and complete documentation enables auditors quick overview of processes and controls, reduces inquiries, and significantly shortens audit duration.
•
Traceability: Detailed process and control descriptions create transparency about "what", "who", "how", and "why" and enable auditors well-founded assessment of appropriateness and effectiveness.
•
Consistency proof: Continuous documentation demonstrates consistent implementation of regulatory requirements across all business areas and processes.
•
Control evidence: Clearly defined control evidence and their systematic retention facilitate effectiveness testing through sampling and evidence requirements.
•
Change history: Documentation of changes and their reasons enables auditors to assess adaptability of risk management to new requirements.
* Typical auditor criticism points on documentation:
•
Inconsistent depth of detail: Non-uniform detailing of documentation across different processes or organizational units.
•
Missing currency: Not updated documentation no longer corresponding to actual processes and controls.
•
Incomplete risk-control assignment: Unclear connection between identified risks and implemented controls.
•
Inadequate control descriptions: Too general or unspecific descriptions of control activities without clear execution instructions.
•
Lacking evidence management: Missing definition or inconsistent retention of control evidence.
•
Isolated documentation elements: Fragmented documentation without recognizable overall context or with contradictions between different documentation parts.
* ADVISORI approach for audit-oriented documentation optimization:
•
Bring in auditor perspective: We optimize your documentation from perspective of internal and external auditors to proactively address typical criticism points.
•
Uniform documentation framework: Development of consistent documentation structure with standardized templates for all process and control descriptions.
•
Evidence management concept: Establishment of systematic approach for defining, creating, and retaining audit-relevant evidence.
•
Risk-control matrices: Creation of transparent assignments between risks and controls with clear representation of risk addressing.
•
Audit trails: Integration of continuous audit trails into documentation ensuring end-to-end traceability of processes and controls.
•
Documentation quality assurance: Conducting systematic reviews of documentation from audit perspective before actual audits.
How can agile methods be reconciled with MaRisk documentation requirements and what approaches does ADVISORI recommend?
Integrating agile working methods with highly structured MaRisk documentation requirements presents many institutions with special challenge. However, apparent contradictions between agile flexibility and regulatory rigor can be bridged through thoughtful approach meeting both requirements.
* Challenges in combining agile methods and regulatory documentation:
•
Different basic principles: Agile methods emphasize incremental development, continuous adaptation, and minimal documentation, while MaRisk requires comprehensive and formalized documentation.
•
Temporal aspect: Agile processes are designed for rapid iterations, while regulatory documentation is typically perceived as time-consuming process.
•
Granularity and formality: Agile teams often prefer flexible, lightweight documentation forms, while supervisory requirements demand structured and formal evidence.
•
Change dynamics: Frequent changes in agile projects can lead to high effort for updating regulatory documentation.
•
Responsibilities: In agile teams, responsibility is often shared, while MaRisk requires clear individual responsibilities.
* Integration approaches for agile methods and MaRisk-compliant documentation:
•
Documentation as user stories: Integration of documentation requirements as explicit user stories or backlog items in agile project methods to treat them as equal part of development process.
•
Continuous documentation: Introduction of parallel, continuous documentation process running synchronously with agile development instead of treating documentation as downstream activity.
•
Documentation DoD (Definition of Done): Inclusion of specific documentation requirements in Definition of Done for user stories and sprints to ensure no functionality is considered complete without corresponding documentation.
•
Automated documentation generation: Use of tools for automated extraction and generation of documentation elements from code, configuration, and test cases to reduce manual documentation effort.
•
Documentation spikes: Planning dedicated periods (spikes) for consolidating and formalizing documentation after multiple development sprints.
* ADVISORI approach for agile MaRisk documentation:
•
Multi-level documentation model: We develop documentation model with different levels, from highly formalized regulatory documents to agile working documents with clear connections between levels.
•
Hybrid roles: Establishment of specialized roles (e.g., Compliance Engineer, Regulatory Product Owner) acting as bridge between agile teams and regulatory requirements.
•
Templates and checklists: Provision of adaptable documentation templates and regulatory checklists that can be directly integrated into agile workflows and tools.
•
Risk-oriented documentation approach: Focusing documentation effort on regulatorily critical aspects based on careful risk analysis to avoid unnecessary documentation.
•
Agile governance structure: Development of governance framework considering both agile principles and regulatory requirements and defining clear escalation paths for compliance topics.
What role does process and control documentation play in mergers and acquisitions, and how does ADVISORI support integration of different documentation standards?
In mergers and acquisitions (M&A) in financial sector, integration of different process and control documentation presents central challenge. Thorough analysis and methodical harmonization of documentation is crucial for successful merger and ensuring continuous MaRisk compliance in merged institution.
* Documentation-relevant challenges in M&A transactions:
•
Different documentation standards: Varying formats, levels of detail, and structural approaches in process and control documentation of involved institutions.
•
Terminological differences: Deviating terminology and taxonomies for similar processes, risks, and controls that can lead to misunderstandings and inconsistencies.
•
Regulatory approvals: Need to provide consistent and complete documentation of combined process and control landscape for supervisory approvals.
•
Process overlaps: Identification of overlaps, gaps, and contradictions in documented processes and controls of merged institutions.
•
Compliance continuity: Ensuring uninterrupted compliance with regulatory requirements during integration phase despite changing processes and responsibilities.
* Documentation-related tasks in M&A process:
•
Due diligence: Systematic analysis and assessment of quality, completeness, and compliance conformity of process and control documentation of target institution.
•
Gap analysis: Identification of differences, gaps, and overlaps between documentation standards and contents of involved institutions.
•
Target vision definition: Development of common target vision for integrated documentation landscape considering strengths of both systems and optimally meeting regulatory requirements.
•
Migration strategy: Development of structured plan for gradual harmonization or redesign of documentation with clear priorities and milestones.
•
Transition management: Ensuring continuous availability of essential documentation during transition phase, especially for critical and heavily regulated processes.
* ADVISORI support in documentation integration:
•
M&A-specific documentation due diligence: Conducting specialized due diligence focused on regulatory quality and completeness of process and control documentation of target institution.
•
Best practice synthesis: Identification and adoption of most effective documentation approaches from both organizations for target vision of integrated documentation.
•
Harmonized taxonomy: Development of uniform terminology and classification for processes, risks, and controls as foundation for integrated documentation.
•
Integration roadmap: Creation of detailed, prioritized roadmap for gradual harmonization of documentation considering operational necessities and regulatory requirements.
•
Compliance monitoring: Establishment of special monitoring system to ensure continuous MaRisk conformity during documentation integration.
Erfolgsgeschichten
Entdecken Sie, wie wir Unternehmen bei ihrer digitalen Transformation unterstützen
Generative KI in der Fertigung
Bosch
KI-Prozessoptimierung für bessere Produktionseffizienz
Fallstudie
Ergebnisse
Reduzierung der Implementierungszeit von AI-Anwendungen auf wenige Wochen
Verbesserung der Produktqualität durch frühzeitige Fehlererkennung
Steigerung der Effizienz in der Fertigung durch reduzierte Downtime
AI Automatisierung in der Produktion
Festo
Intelligente Vernetzung für zukunftsfähige Produktionssysteme
Fallstudie
Ergebnisse
Verbesserung der Produktionsgeschwindigkeit und Flexibilität
Reduzierung der Herstellungskosten durch effizientere Ressourcennutzung
Erhöhung der Kundenzufriedenheit durch personalisierte Produkte
KI-gestützte Fertigungsoptimierung
Siemens
Smarte Fertigungslösungen für maximale Wertschöpfung
Fallstudie
Ergebnisse
Erhebliche Steigerung der Produktionsleistung
Reduzierung von Downtime und Produktionskosten
Verbesserung der Nachhaltigkeit durch effizientere Ressourcennutzung
Digitalisierung im Stahlhandel
Klöckner & Co
Digitalisierung im Stahlhandel
Fallstudie
Ergebnisse
Über 2 Milliarden Euro Umsatz jährlich über digitale Kanäle
Ziel, bis 2022 60% des Umsatzes online zu erzielen
Verbesserung der Kundenzufriedenheit durch automatisierte Prozesse
Lassen Sie uns
Zusammenarbeiten!
Ist Ihr Unternehmen bereit für den nächsten Schritt in die digitale Zukunft? Kontaktieren Sie uns für eine persönliche Beratung.
Ihr strategischer Erfolg beginnt hier
Unsere Kunden vertrauen auf unsere Expertise in digitaler Transformation, Compliance und Risikomanagement
Bereit für den nächsten Schritt?
Vereinbaren Sie jetzt ein strategisches Beratungsgespräch mit unseren Experten
30 Minuten • Unverbindlich • Sofort verfügbar
Zur optimalen Vorbereitung Ihres Strategiegesprächs:
Ihre strategischen Ziele und Herausforderungen
Gewünschte Geschäftsergebnisse und ROI-Erwartungen
Aktuelle Compliance- und Risikosituation
Stakeholder und Entscheidungsträger im Projekt
Bevorzugen Sie direkten Kontakt?
Direkte Hotline für Entscheidungsträger
Strategische Anfragen per E-Mail
Detaillierte Projektanfrage
Für komplexe Anfragen oder wenn Sie spezifische Informationen vorab übermitteln möchten