ADVISORI Logo
BlogCase StudiesÜber uns
info@advisori.de+49 69 913 113-01
  1. Home/
  2. Leistungen/
  3. Regulatory Compliance Management/
  4. DORA Digital Operational Resilience Act/
  5. DORA Requirements/
  6. DORA ICT Risk Management En

Newsletter abonnieren

Bleiben Sie auf dem Laufenden mit den neuesten Trends und Entwicklungen

Durch Abonnieren stimmen Sie unseren Datenschutzbestimmungen zu.

A
ADVISORI FTC GmbH

Transformation. Innovation. Sicherheit.

Firmenadresse

Kaiserstraße 44

60329 Frankfurt am Main

Deutschland

Auf Karte ansehen

Kontakt

info@advisori.de+49 69 913 113-01

Mo-Fr: 9:00 - 18:00 Uhr

Unternehmen

Leistungen

Social Media

Folgen Sie uns und bleiben Sie auf dem neuesten Stand.

  • /
  • /

© 2024 ADVISORI FTC GmbH. Alle Rechte vorbehalten.

Your browser does not support the video tag.
Effective Management of ICT Risks According to DORA Requirements

DORA ICT Risk Management

The Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) requires comprehensive management of ICT risks. We support you in implementing a robust ICT risk management framework in compliance with DORA requirements.

  • ✓Systematic identification and assessment of ICT risks
  • ✓Implementation of a DORA-compliant ICT risk management framework
  • ✓Effective risk treatment and controls for digital resilience
  • ✓Continuous monitoring and reporting of ICT risks

Ihr Erfolg beginnt hier

Bereit für den nächsten Schritt?

Schnell, einfach und absolut unverbindlich.

Zur optimalen Vorbereitung:

  • Ihr Anliegen
  • Wunsch-Ergebnis
  • Bisherige Schritte

Oder kontaktieren Sie uns direkt:

info@advisori.de+49 69 913 113-01

Zertifikate, Partner und mehr...

ISO 9001 CertifiedISO 27001 CertifiedISO 14001 CertifiedBeyondTrust PartnerBVMW Bundesverband MitgliedMitigant PartnerGoogle PartnerTop 100 InnovatorMicrosoft AzureAmazon Web Services

DORA ICT Risk Management

Our Strengths

  • In-depth expertise in regulatory requirements and ICT risk management
  • Proven methods for implementing DORA-compliant risk management frameworks
  • Comprehensive understanding of specific risk profiles of financial institutions
  • Interdisciplinary teams with expertise in regulation, IT, and risk management
⚠

Expert Tip

Integrating DORA-compliant ICT risk management into the existing risk management framework increases efficiency and promotes a holistic approach to managing risks.

ADVISORI in Zahlen

11+

Jahre Erfahrung

120+

Mitarbeiter

520+

Projekte

In implementing DORA-compliant ICT risk management, we follow a systematic and individually tailored approach.

Unser Ansatz:

Analysis of existing ICT risk management and GAP analysis against DORA requirements

Development of a customized ICT risk management framework

Implementation of methods and tools for risk identification and assessment

Development and implementation of risk treatment measures

Establishment of processes for continuous monitoring and reporting

"With ADVISORI, we found a competent partner who supported us in implementing DORA-compliant ICT risk management. Thanks to professional consulting and a practical approach, we were able to establish a robust risk management framework that both meets regulatory requirements and strengthens our business processes."
Sarah Richter

Sarah Richter

Head of Informationssicherheit, Cyber Security

Expertise & Erfahrung:

10+ Jahre Erfahrung, CISA, CISM, Lead Auditor, DORA, NIS2, BCM, Cyber- und Informationssicherheit

LinkedIn Profil

DORA-Audit-Pakete

Unsere DORA-Audit-Pakete bieten eine strukturierte Bewertung Ihres IKT-Risikomanagements – abgestimmt auf die regulatorischen Anforderungen gemäß DORA. Erhalten Sie hier einen Überblick:

DORA-Audit-Pakete ansehen

Unsere Dienstleistungen

Wir bieten Ihnen maßgeschneiderte Lösungen für Ihre digitale Transformation

ICT Risk Management Assessment

We analyze your existing ICT risk management and identify gaps regarding DORA requirements.

  • Assessment of existing risk management processes
  • GAP analysis against DORA requirements
  • Identification of optimization potentials
  • Development of an action plan

DORA-Compliant ICT Risk Management Framework

We develop and implement a customized risk management framework that meets DORA requirements.

  • Development of a governance model for ICT risks
  • Definition of roles and responsibilities
  • Establishment of risk treatment processes
  • Integration into existing governance structures

Suchen Sie nach einer vollständigen Übersicht aller unserer Dienstleistungen?

Zur kompletten Service-Übersicht

Unsere Kompetenzbereiche in Regulatory Compliance Management

Unsere Expertise im Management regulatorischer Compliance und Transformation, inklusive DORA.

Banklizenz Beantragen

Weitere Informationen zu Banklizenz Beantragen.

▼
    • Banklizenz Governance Organisationsstruktur
      • Banklizenz Aufsichtsrat Vorstandsrollen
      • Banklizenz IKS Compliance Funktionen
      • Banklizenz Kontroll Steuerungsprozesse
    • Banklizenz IT Meldewesen Setup
      • Banklizenz Datenschnittstellen Workflow Management
      • Banklizenz Implementierung Aufsichtsrechtlicher Meldesysteme
      • Banklizenz Launch Phase Reporting
    • Banklizenz Vorstudie
      • Banklizenz Feasibility Businessplan
      • Banklizenz Kapitalbedarf Budgetierung
      • Banklizenz Risiko Chancen Analyse
Basel III

Weitere Informationen zu Basel III.

▼
    • Basel III Implementation
      • Basel III Anpassung Interner Risikomodelle
      • Basel III Implementierung Von Stresstests Szenarioanalysen
      • Basel III Reporting Compliance Verfahren
    • Basel III Ongoing Compliance
      • Basel III Interne Externe Audit Unterstuetzung
      • Basel III Kontinuierliche Pruefung Der Kennzahlen
      • Basel III Ueberwachung Aufsichtsrechtlicher Aenderungen
    • Basel III Readiness
      • Basel III Einfuehrung Neuer Kennzahlen Countercyclical Buffer Etc
      • Basel III Gap Analyse Umsetzungsfahrplan
      • Basel III Kapital Und Liquiditaetsvorschriften Leverage Ratio LCR NSFR
BCBS 239

Weitere Informationen zu BCBS 239.

▼
    • BCBS 239 Implementation
      • BCBS 239 IT Prozessanpassungen
      • BCBS 239 Risikodatenaggregation Automatisierte Berichterstattung
      • BCBS 239 Testing Validierung
    • BCBS 239 Ongoing Compliance
      • BCBS 239 Audit Pruefungsunterstuetzung
      • BCBS 239 Kontinuierliche Prozessoptimierung
      • BCBS 239 Monitoring KPI Tracking
    • BCBS 239 Readiness
      • BCBS 239 Data Governance Rollen
      • BCBS 239 Gap Analyse Zielbild
      • BCBS 239 Ist Analyse Datenarchitektur
CIS Controls

Weitere Informationen zu CIS Controls.

▼
    • CIS Controls Kontrolle Reifegradbewertung
    • CIS Controls Priorisierung Risikoanalys
    • CIS Controls Umsetzung Top 20 Controls
Cloud Compliance

Weitere Informationen zu Cloud Compliance.

▼
    • Cloud Compliance Audits Zertifizierungen ISO SOC2
    • Cloud Compliance Cloud Sicherheitsarchitektur SLA Management
    • Cloud Compliance Hybrid Und Multi Cloud Governance
CRA Cyber Resilience Act

Weitere Informationen zu CRA Cyber Resilience Act.

▼
    • CRA Cyber Resilience Act Conformity Assessment
      • CRA Cyber Resilience Act CE Marking
      • CRA Cyber Resilience Act External Audits
      • CRA Cyber Resilience Act Self Assessment
    • CRA Cyber Resilience Act Market Surveillance
      • CRA Cyber Resilience Act Corrective Actions
      • CRA Cyber Resilience Act Product Registration
      • CRA Cyber Resilience Act Regulatory Controls
    • CRA Cyber Resilience Act Product Security Requirements
      • CRA Cyber Resilience Act Security By Default
      • CRA Cyber Resilience Act Security By Design
      • CRA Cyber Resilience Act Update Management
      • CRA Cyber Resilience Act Vulnerability Management
CRR CRD

Weitere Informationen zu CRR CRD.

▼
    • CRR CRD Implementation
      • CRR CRD Offenlegungsanforderungen Pillar III
      • CRR CRD Prozessautomatisierung Im Meldewesen
      • CRR CRD SREP Vorbereitung Dokumentation
    • CRR CRD Ongoing Compliance
      • CRR CRD Reporting Kommunikation Mit Aufsichtsbehoerden
      • CRR CRD Risikosteuerung Validierung
      • CRR CRD Schulungen Change Management
    • CRR CRD Readiness
      • CRR CRD Gap Analyse Prozesse Systeme
      • CRR CRD Kapital Liquiditaetsplanung ICAAP ILAAP
      • CRR CRD RWA Berechnung Methodik
Datenschutzkoordinator Schulung

Weitere Informationen zu Datenschutzkoordinator Schulung.

▼
    • Datenschutzkoordinator Schulung Grundlagen DSGVO BDSG
    • Datenschutzkoordinator Schulung Incident Management Meldepflichten
    • Datenschutzkoordinator Schulung Datenschutzprozesse Dokumentation
    • Datenschutzkoordinator Schulung Rollen Verantwortlichkeiten Koordinator Vs DPO
DORA Digital Operational Resilience Act

Stärken Sie Ihre digitale operationelle Widerstandsfähigkeit gemäß DORA.

▼
    • DORA Compliance
      • Audit Readiness
      • Control Implementation
      • Documentation Framework
      • Monitoring Reporting
      • Training Awareness
    • DORA Implementation
      • Gap Analyse Assessment
      • ICT Risk Management Framework
      • Implementation Roadmap
      • Incident Reporting System
      • Third Party Risk Management
    • DORA Requirements
      • Digital Operational Resilience Testing
      • ICT Incident Management
      • ICT Risk Management
      • ICT Third Party Risk
      • Information Sharing
DSGVO

Weitere Informationen zu DSGVO.

▼
    • DSGVO Implementation
      • DSGVO Datenschutz Folgenabschaetzung DPIA
      • DSGVO Prozesse Fuer Meldung Von Datenschutzverletzungen
      • DSGVO Technische Organisatorische Massnahmen
    • DSGVO Ongoing Compliance
      • DSGVO Laufende Audits Kontrollen
      • DSGVO Schulungen Awareness Programme
      • DSGVO Zusammenarbeit Mit Aufsichtsbehoerden
    • DSGVO Readiness
      • DSGVO Datenschutz Analyse Gap Assessment
      • DSGVO Privacy By Design Default
      • DSGVO Rollen Verantwortlichkeiten DPO Koordinator
EBA

Weitere Informationen zu EBA.

▼
    • EBA Guidelines Implementation
      • EBA FINREP COREP Anpassungen
      • EBA Governance Outsourcing ESG Vorgaben
      • EBA Self Assessments Gap Analysen
    • EBA Ongoing Compliance
      • EBA Mitarbeiterschulungen Sensibilisierung
      • EBA Monitoring Von EBA Updates
      • EBA Remediation Kontinuierliche Verbesserung
    • EBA SREP Readiness
      • EBA Dokumentations Und Prozessoptimierung
      • EBA Eskalations Kommunikationsstrukturen
      • EBA Pruefungsmanagement Follow Up
EU AI Act

Weitere Informationen zu EU AI Act.

▼
    • EU AI Act AI Compliance Framework
      • EU AI Act Algorithmic Assessment
      • EU AI Act Bias Testing
      • EU AI Act Ethics Guidelines
      • EU AI Act Quality Management
      • EU AI Act Transparency Requirements
    • EU AI Act AI Risk Classification
      • EU AI Act Compliance Requirements
      • EU AI Act Documentation Requirements
      • EU AI Act Monitoring Systems
      • EU AI Act Risk Assessment
      • EU AI Act System Classification
    • EU AI Act High Risk AI Systems
      • EU AI Act Data Governance
      • EU AI Act Human Oversight
      • EU AI Act Record Keeping
      • EU AI Act Risk Management System
      • EU AI Act Technical Documentation
FRTB

Weitere Informationen zu FRTB.

▼
    • FRTB Implementation
      • FRTB Marktpreisrisikomodelle Validierung
      • FRTB Reporting Compliance Framework
      • FRTB Risikodatenerhebung Datenqualitaet
    • FRTB Ongoing Compliance
      • FRTB Audit Unterstuetzung Dokumentation
      • FRTB Prozessoptimierung Schulungen
      • FRTB Ueberwachung Re Kalibrierung Der Modelle
    • FRTB Readiness
      • FRTB Auswahl Standard Approach Vs Internal Models
      • FRTB Gap Analyse Daten Prozesse
      • FRTB Neuausrichtung Handels Bankbuch Abgrenzung
ISO 27001

Weitere Informationen zu ISO 27001.

▼
    • ISO 27001 Internes Audit Zertifizierungsvorbereitung
    • ISO 27001 ISMS Einfuehrung Annex A Controls
    • ISO 27001 Reifegradbewertung Kontinuierliche Verbesserung
IT Grundschutz BSI

Weitere Informationen zu IT Grundschutz BSI.

▼
    • IT Grundschutz BSI BSI Standards Kompendium
    • IT Grundschutz BSI Frameworks Struktur Baustein Analyse
    • IT Grundschutz BSI Zertifizierungsbegleitung Audit Support
KRITIS

Weitere Informationen zu KRITIS.

▼
    • KRITIS Implementation
      • KRITIS Kontinuierliche Ueberwachung Incident Management
      • KRITIS Meldepflichten Behoerdenkommunikation
      • KRITIS Schutzkonzepte Physisch Digital
    • KRITIS Ongoing Compliance
      • KRITIS Prozessanpassungen Bei Neuen Bedrohungen
      • KRITIS Regelmaessige Tests Audits
      • KRITIS Schulungen Awareness Kampagnen
    • KRITIS Readiness
      • KRITIS Gap Analyse Organisation Technik
      • KRITIS Notfallkonzepte Ressourcenplanung
      • KRITIS Schwachstellenanalyse Risikobewertung
MaRisk

Weitere Informationen zu MaRisk.

▼
    • MaRisk Implementation
      • MaRisk Dokumentationsanforderungen Prozess Kontrollbeschreibungen
      • MaRisk IKS Verankerung
      • MaRisk Risikosteuerungs Tools Integration
    • MaRisk Ongoing Compliance
      • MaRisk Audit Readiness
      • MaRisk Schulungen Sensibilisierung
      • MaRisk Ueberwachung Reporting
    • MaRisk Readiness
      • MaRisk Gap Analyse
      • MaRisk Organisations Steuerungsprozesse
      • MaRisk Ressourcenkonzept Fach IT Kapazitaeten
MiFID

Weitere Informationen zu MiFID.

▼
    • MiFID Implementation
      • MiFID Anpassung Vertriebssteuerung Prozessablaeufe
      • MiFID Dokumentation IT Anbindung
      • MiFID Transparenz Berichtspflichten RTS 27 28
    • MiFID II Readiness
      • MiFID Best Execution Transaktionsueberwachung
      • MiFID Gap Analyse Roadmap
      • MiFID Produkt Anlegerschutz Zielmarkt Geeignetheitspruefung
    • MiFID Ongoing Compliance
      • MiFID Anpassung An Neue ESMA BAFIN Vorgaben
      • MiFID Fortlaufende Schulungen Monitoring
      • MiFID Regelmaessige Kontrollen Audits
NIST Cybersecurity Framework

Weitere Informationen zu NIST Cybersecurity Framework.

▼
    • NIST Cybersecurity Framework Identify Protect Detect Respond Recover
    • NIST Cybersecurity Framework Integration In Unternehmensprozesse
    • NIST Cybersecurity Framework Maturity Assessment Roadmap
NIS2

Weitere Informationen zu NIS2.

▼
    • NIS2 Readiness
      • NIS2 Compliance Roadmap
      • NIS2 Gap Analyse
      • NIS2 Implementation Strategy
      • NIS2 Risk Management Framework
      • NIS2 Scope Assessment
    • NIS2 Sector Specific Requirements
      • NIS2 Authority Communication
      • NIS2 Cross Border Cooperation
      • NIS2 Essential Entities
      • NIS2 Important Entities
      • NIS2 Reporting Requirements
    • NIS2 Security Measures
      • NIS2 Business Continuity Management
      • NIS2 Crisis Management
      • NIS2 Incident Handling
      • NIS2 Risk Analysis Systems
      • NIS2 Supply Chain Security
Privacy Program

Weitere Informationen zu Privacy Program.

▼
    • Privacy Program Drittdienstleistermanagement
      • Privacy Program Datenschutzrisiko Bewertung Externer Partner
      • Privacy Program Rezertifizierung Onboarding Prozesse
      • Privacy Program Vertraege AVV Monitoring Reporting
    • Privacy Program Privacy Controls Audit Support
      • Privacy Program Audit Readiness Pruefungsbegleitung
      • Privacy Program Datenschutzanalyse Dokumentation
      • Privacy Program Technische Organisatorische Kontrollen
    • Privacy Program Privacy Framework Setup
      • Privacy Program Datenschutzstrategie Governance
      • Privacy Program DPO Office Rollenverteilung
      • Privacy Program Richtlinien Prozesse
Regulatory Transformation Projektmanagement

Wir steuern Ihre regulatorischen Transformationsprojekte erfolgreich – von der Konzeption bis zur nachhaltigen Implementierung.

▼
    • Change Management Workshops Schulungen
    • Implementierung Neuer Vorgaben CRR KWG MaRisk BAIT IFRS Etc
    • Projekt Programmsteuerung
    • Prozessdigitalisierung Workflow Optimierung
Software Compliance

Weitere Informationen zu Software Compliance.

▼
    • Cloud Compliance Lizenzmanagement Inventarisierung Kommerziell OSS
    • Cloud Compliance Open Source Compliance Entwickler Schulungen
    • Cloud Compliance Prozessintegration Continuous Monitoring
TISAX VDA ISA

Weitere Informationen zu TISAX VDA ISA.

▼
    • TISAX VDA ISA Audit Vorbereitung Labeling
    • TISAX VDA ISA Automotive Supply Chain Compliance
    • TISAX VDA Self Assessment Gap Analyse
VS-NFD

Weitere Informationen zu VS-NFD.

▼
    • VS-NFD Implementation
      • VS-NFD Monitoring Regular Checks
      • VS-NFD Prozessintegration Schulungen
      • VS-NFD Zugangsschutz Kontrollsysteme
    • VS-NFD Ongoing Compliance
      • VS-NFD Audit Trails Protokollierung
      • VS-NFD Kontinuierliche Verbesserung
      • VS-NFD Meldepflichten Behoerdenkommunikation
    • VS-NFD Readiness
      • VS-NFD Dokumentations Sicherheitskonzept
      • VS-NFD Klassifizierung Kennzeichnung Verschlusssachen
      • VS-NFD Rollen Verantwortlichkeiten Definieren
ESG

Weitere Informationen zu ESG.

▼
    • ESG Assessment
    • ESG Audit
    • ESG CSRD
    • ESG Dashboard
    • ESG Datamanagement
    • ESG Due Diligence
    • ESG Governance
    • ESG Implementierung Ongoing ESG Compliance Schulungen Sensibilisierung Audit Readiness Kontinuierliche Verbesserung
    • ESG Kennzahlen
    • ESG KPIs Monitoring KPI Festlegung Benchmarking Datenmanagement Qualitaetssicherung
    • ESG Lieferkettengesetz
    • ESG Nachhaltigkeitsbericht
    • ESG Rating
    • ESG Rating Reporting GRI SASB CDP EU Taxonomie Kommunikation An Stakeholder Investoren
    • ESG Reporting
    • ESG Soziale Aspekte Lieferketten Lieferkettengesetz Menschenrechts Arbeitsstandards Diversity Inclusion
    • ESG Strategie
    • ESG Strategie Governance Leitbildentwicklung Stakeholder Dialog Verankerung In Unternehmenszielen
    • ESG Training
    • ESG Transformation
    • ESG Umweltmanagement Dekarbonisierung Klimaschutzprogramme Energieeffizienz CO2 Bilanzierung Scope 1 3
    • ESG Zertifizierung

Häufig gestellte Fragen zur DORA ICT Risk Management

Why should DORA-compliant ICT risk management be a strategic priority for the C-Suite, and how does ADVISORI support implementation?

For executive leadership, DORA-compliant ICT risk management is far more than a regulatory compliance exercise – it is a strategic imperative that secures organizational resilience while unlocking competitive advantages. Increasing digitalization and interconnectedness make financial institutions more vulnerable to ICT-related disruptions that can take on existential dimensions. ADVISORI offers a holistic perspective that integrates technical, regulatory, and business aspects.

🔍 Strategic Relevance for the C-Suite:

• Business Continuity Assurance: Robust ICT risk management prevents costly operational interruptions and secures critical business processes – an average hour of system downtime costs financial institutions up to €1.5 million.
• Trust Foundation: In a data-driven financial world, the trust of customers, partners, and supervisory authorities is your most valuable asset – DORA compliance signals reliability and diligence in handling ICT risks.
• Competitive Advantage: Early and comprehensive DORA implementation creates differentiation potential versus competitors and can open new business opportunities.
• Personal Liability Avoidance: DORA introduces explicit responsibilities for the management body – inadequate implementation can mean personal liability risks for board members.

🛡 ️ The ADVISORI Approach for Strategic ICT Risk Management:

• Executive-Level Alignment: We begin with strategic alignment that harmonizes ICT risk management with your overarching business objectives and risk appetite statement.
• Holistic Integration: Instead of isolated ICT risk management silos, we create seamless integration into your existing governance structures and enterprise risk management processes.
• Pragmatic Implementation: We pursue a practice-oriented approach that fulfills regulatory requirements while creating operational added value, without generating unnecessary complexity.
• Future-Proof Architecture: Our framework is flexibly designed to keep pace with the evolution of DORA requirements, technological changes, and the development of your business model.

How do we quantify the ROI of an investment in DORA-compliant ICT risk management and what impact does this have on our financial metrics?

Implementing DORA-compliant ICT risk management undoubtedly represents a significant investment, whose return on investment is justified through quantifiable financial benefits, reduced risk positions, and strategic value creation. For the C-Suite, clear quantification of these benefits is crucial for informed investment decisions and resource prioritization.

💰 Direct Financial Implications:

• Reduction of Incident Costs: Through systematic identification and treatment of ICT risks, average costs per security incident can be reduced by 40‑60% – for a typical financial institution, this corresponds to savings of €2‑5 million annually.
• Optimization of Insurance Premiums: Demonstrably robust ICT risk management can reduce cyber insurance premiums by up to 15‑25% while simultaneously improving insurance coverage.
• Efficiency Gains: Automation and standardization of risk management processes leads to operational efficiency gains of typically 20‑30% compared to manual, fragmented approaches.
• Avoidance of Regulatory Sanctions: DORA violations can result in fines of up to 2% of global annual turnover – an existential threat that is neutralized through compliant risk management.

📊 Impact on Financial Metrics:

• EBITDA Stabilization: By reducing unexpected costs for security incidents, EBITDA volatility is reduced and predictability is increased.
• Capital Allocation Optimization: A risk-oriented approach enables more precise capital allocation for ICT investments and prevents misallocations in non-priority areas.
• Market Valuation Premium: Analysts and investors increasingly consider digital resilience in company valuation – studies show an average valuation premium of 5‑10% for companies with demonstrably robust ICT risk management.
• Lower Cost of Capital: Reduced risk exposure can lead to improved ratings and consequently lower capital costs.

What fundamental changes does implementing DORA-compliant ICT risk management require in our governance structure and corporate culture?

Implementing DORA-compliant ICT risk management requires more far-reaching changes than just introducing new processes and tools. For sustainable effectiveness, there must be a fundamental transformation in governance structures, corporate culture, and strategic alignment. ADVISORI accompanies you in this transformation with a holistic change management approach.

🏛 ️ Governance Transformation:

• Three Lines Model 2.0: DORA requires a realignment of the classic three-lines-of-defense model with clear responsibility assignment for ICT risks at all levels – from operational units through risk management functions to internal audit.
• Board-Level Engagement: The management body must be actively involved in ICT risk governance, with regular reporting, dedicated risk appetite, and clear escalation paths.
• Cross-Functional Control Structures: Building committees and working groups that unite IT, risk management, compliance, business continuity, and operational units overcomes traditional silos.
• Formalized Responsibilities: Establishing clearly documented roles and responsibilities (RACI matrix) for all aspects of ICT risk management creates clarity and accountability.

🧠 Cultural Change and Mindset Shift:

• Risk Awareness Instead of Compliance Thinking: The shift from a pure compliance mentality to a proactive risk management culture, where ICT risks are viewed as an integral part of all business decisions.
• Top-Down Leadership: Visible support and role modeling by executive leadership is crucial – DORA compliance must be communicated and lived as a strategic priority.
• Error Culture Establishment: Promoting open communication about vulnerabilities and incidents without blame is essential for continuous improvement.
• Collaborative Thinking: Overcoming the historical separation between IT and business units in favor of a shared understanding of ICT risks and shared responsibility.

🔄 Operationalization of Change:

• Change Acceleration Program: ADVISORI supports you with a structured change management approach that includes stakeholder analyses, communication strategies, and training programs.
• Culture Assessment: We conduct an objective assessment of your existing risk culture and identify specific development areas.
• Leadership Enablement: Special workshops and coaching for leaders to enable them to effectively steer the cultural change.
• Sustainability Measurement: Development of KPIs for continuous measurement of cultural transformation and its impact on the ICT risk situation.

How can we use DORA-compliant ICT risk management as a strategic enabler for digital innovation, rather than viewing it merely as a regulatory burden?

Implementing DORA-compliant ICT risk management offers far more than just regulatory compliance – properly designed, it becomes a strategic enabler for innovation, digital transformation, and sustainable competitive advantages. ADVISORI helps you transform this regulatory requirement into a business-strategic advantage.

🚀 From Compliance to Competitive Advantage:

• Security as Innovation Foundation: Mature ICT risk management creates the foundation for secure and rapid innovation – companies with robust security frameworks can bring new digital products to market up to 40% faster.
• Trust-Based Differentiation: In an era of growing cyber incidents, demonstrable digital resilience becomes a differentiating feature – 76% of customers in the financial sector consider data security and system stability as decisive selection criteria.
• Enabler for New Business Models: Future-proof ICT risk management enables the secure development of new digital business models, cloud migrations, and ecosystem partnerships.
• Data-Driven Decision Making: The monitoring and reporting capabilities required for DORA deliver valuable data for strategic decisions and resource allocation far beyond compliance purposes.

💡 Strategic Integration of ICT Risk Management:

• Security & Innovation by Design: Integration of risk management principles already in early phases of product and solution development through DevSecOps approaches and secure-by-design methods.
• Risk-Informed Decision-Making: Using ICT risk analyses to make informed decisions about digital investments, cloud migrations, and technological innovations.
• Strategic Partnerships: Using DORA-compliant third-party risk management not only for risk minimization but for strategic selection and development of technology partnerships.
• Talent Magnet: Mature ICT risk management with state-of-the-art tools and methods makes you more attractive to top talent in cybersecurity, risk management, and IT.

🔮 Future-Proofing Through Forward-Looking Risk Management:

• Horizon Scanning: Systematic identification and assessment of emerging technologies and associated risks to recognize opportunities early and neutralize threats.
• Adaptive Risk Models: Development of flexible risk models that keep pace with the evolution of your business model and the technological landscape.
• Digital Resilience as Competitive Advantage: Positioning your digital resilience as a strategic strength in market and customer communication.
• Knowledge Management: Establishing organization-wide knowledge management for ICT risks that promotes continuous learning and makes innovations safer.

How can we align DORA-compliant ICT risk management with our digital transformation strategy to ensure compliance while unlocking innovation potential?

Harmonizing regulatory requirements and digital innovation is one of the central challenges for modern financial institutions. Strategically implemented DORA-compliant ICT risk management can act as a catalyst for your digital transformation while ensuring necessary security and compliance. ADVISORI supports you in creating this synergy with an integrated approach.

🔄 Integration Strategies for Compliance and Innovation:

• Digital-First Risk Management: Implementation of digitalized, data-driven risk management that itself embodies the principles of digital transformation and uses modern technologies like AI and advanced analytics.
• Early Compliance Integration: Anchoring DORA requirements already in the conception phase of new digital products and services through compliance-by-design and security-by-design principles.
• Agile Governance Models: Development of governance structures that offer both the stability for compliance and the flexibility for innovation – e.g., through bimodal IT organizations with different speeds and risk appetites.
• Continuous Compliance Monitoring: Establishment of automated, ongoing monitoring mechanisms that ensure regulatory conformity in real-time while delivering valuable data for strategic decisions.

🌉 Bridges Between Risk Control and Digital Innovation:

• Strategic Risk Mapping: Systematic identification of risk areas in your digital transformation roadmap and development of targeted control mechanisms that ensure security without slowing innovation.
• Innovation Labs with Risk Sandbox: Creation of protected environments where new technologies and business models can be tested while potential ICT risks are continuously assessed and addressed.
• Building Digital Risk Competencies: Development of hybrid talent pools with expertise in both regulatory topics and digital technologies to overcome the traditional separation between compliance and innovation.
• Dynamic Risk Assessment: Implementation of adaptive risk assessment models that adjust in real-time to changing digital landscapes and enable appropriate risk treatment.

⚡ Levers for Accelerated Digital Transformation:

• Trust Accelerator: Using robust ICT risk management as an enabler for faster customer acceptance of digital innovations through demonstrably high security and resilience standards.
• Regulatory Sandbox Approach: Proactive collaboration with supervisory authorities to test innovative digital solutions in a controlled framework while ensuring DORA compliance.
• Technology Portfolio Optimization: Using ICT risk assessment to identify and prioritize legacy systems that should be replaced by modern, resilient technologies.
• Strategic Vendor Management: Development of DORA-compliant third-party risk management that not only minimizes risks but also supports strategic selection of the right technology partners for your digital transformation.

What specific benchmark data and best practices from competitors and industry leaders should we consider when implementing DORA-compliant ICT risk management?

Implementing DORA-compliant ICT risk management requires more than just meeting regulatory minimum requirements. By looking at benchmark data and best practices from industry leaders, you can gain orientation for your own implementation and build a competitive advantage. ADVISORI brings comprehensive market insights and proven best practices to your organization.

📊 Benchmark Data and Investment Trends:

• Budget Allocation: Leading financial institutions invest an average of 9‑13% of their IT budget in ICT risk management and cybersecurity, with an increasing trend of 15‑20% annually since DORA's introduction.
• Staffing: The industry standard is a ratio of 1:

45 between ICT risk management specialists and IT staff, with industry leaders targeting a ratio of 1:30.

• Automation Level: Top performers have automated 60‑75% of their ICT risk management processes, increasing efficiency by an average of 35% while reducing error rates by 45%.
• Response Times: Industry leaders have reduced their Mean Time to Detect (MTTD) for ICT security incidents to under

2 hours and their Mean Time to Respond (MTTR) to under

4 hours.

🏆 Best Practices from Industry Leaders:

• Integrated Three Lines Model: Implementation of a modernized Three Lines Model with fluid transitions between defense lines and clear responsibility assignment – while promoting collaboration and knowledge exchange.
• Risk Culture Transformation: Systematic establishment of an enterprise-wide risk culture through executive sponsorship, continuous training programs, and incentive systems that reward proactive risk management.
• End-to-End Digitalization: Complete digitalization of the ICT risk management lifecycle, from automated risk identification to real-time reporting to the board and supervisory authorities.
• Advanced Analytics: Use of AI and machine learning for predictive risk analyses that can detect potential ICT risks early and trigger automated prevention measures.

📱 Digital Tools and Technologies:

• GRC Platforms: Leading institutions use integrated Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) platforms specifically optimized for DORA requirements and offering seamless integration into the IT landscape.
• Security Orchestration & Automation: Implementation of SOAR solutions (Security Orchestration, Automation and Response) for automating security measures and incident response.
• Continuous Control Monitoring: Use of tools for continuous monitoring of controls that detect deviations in real-time and trigger automatic alerting mechanisms.
• Digital Twin for ICT Infrastructure: Use of digital twins to simulate ICT risk scenarios and test resilience measures without impacting the production environment.

🤝 Collaborative Governance Models:

• ICT Risk Council: Establishment of a cross-functional ICT Risk Council with representatives from business, IT, risk management, and compliance that steers the strategic alignment of ICT risk management.
• Regulatory Engagement: Proactive dialogue with supervisory authorities and active participation in industry initiatives to co-shape DORA implementation practice.
• Supply Chain Risk Collaboration: Building collaboration platforms with critical service providers for joint risk assessment and coordinated incident response.
• Peer Knowledge Exchange: Participation in closed information exchange forums where financial institutions can share experiences and best practices in a protected framework.

How can we use ICT risk management implementation to efficiently fulfill additional regulatory requirements (e.g., NIS2, GDPR, MaRisk) and create synergies?

Implementing DORA-compliant ICT risk management offers an ideal opportunity to establish an integrated compliance approach that harmonizes multiple regulatory requirements and unlocks synergies. Instead of isolated compliance silos, ADVISORI supports you in creating a coherent framework that increases efficiency and avoids duplication.

🔄 Regulatory Synergies and Overlaps:

• DORA and NIS2: Both regulations focus on digital resilience and cybersecurity. An integrated approach can cover up to 75% of requirements and avoid duplication – especially in risk management, incident reporting, and business continuity.
• DORA and GDPR: Synergies exist primarily in the security of personal data, incident response, and third-party risk management. A harmonized approach can jointly address approximately 60% of relevant controls.
• DORA and MaRisk/BAIT: German supervisory requirements MaRisk and BAIT share central principles with DORA in IT governance and risk management. Synergies of up to 80% are achievable here, especially in designing the ICS and emergency management.
• DORA and ISO 27001/NIST: Established security standards like ISO 27001 or NIST Cybersecurity Framework form a solid foundation and can be used for 65‑70% of DORA requirements.

📋 Strategies for an Integrated Compliance Framework:

• Unified Control Framework: Development of an enterprise-wide control catalog that consolidates requirements of all relevant regulations and eliminates redundant controls.
• Harmonized Governance Structure: Establishment of an overarching governance model with clear responsibilities for all regulatory domains and optimized reporting paths.
• Integrated Risk Management: Implementation of a holistic risk management process that covers both DORA-specific ICT risks and related risk domains (e.g., data protection, operational risks).
• Common Taxonomy: Creation of a unified taxonomy and language for risks, controls, and incidents that is consistently applied across all regulatory areas.

💼 Operationalization of the Integrated Approach:

• Regulatory Mapping & Gap Analysis: Detailed analysis of overlaps and specific requirements of different regulations as a basis for an integrated compliance program.
• Cross-Functional Teams: Formation of regulation-spanning teams that bundle expertise from different compliance areas and jointly develop efficient solutions.
• Technological Support: Use of integrated GRC platforms that support multiple regulatory frameworks and enable consolidated reporting.
• Streamlined Audit Processes: Development of a coordinated audit approach that covers multiple regulatory requirements in consolidated audit cycles and reduces audit burden.

🌐 Future-Proofing Through Regulatory Intelligence:

• Regulatory Intelligence Hub: Establishment of a central function for regulatory intelligence that identifies emerging requirements early and embeds them in the integrated framework.
• Scenario-Based Adaptability: Development of scenarios for regulatory developments and forward-looking adaptation of the compliance framework.
• Compliance-by-Design: Anchoring regulatory requirements in business processes and IT systems from the start to minimize subsequent adjustments.
• Regulatory Dialogue: Proactive participation in consultations and industry committees to co-shape regulatory developments and respond early to changes.

What critical success factors and potential pitfalls should the C-Suite consider when implementing DORA-compliant ICT risk management?

Implementing DORA-compliant ICT risk management is a complex undertaking with far-reaching implications for the entire organization. For the C-Suite, it is crucial to know both the critical success factors and potential pitfalls to ensure successful implementation. ADVISORI supports you in overcoming typical hurdles and implementing best practices.

🔑 Critical Success Factors:

• C-Level Sponsorship and Active Engagement: Successful DORA implementations are characterized by visible commitment from top leadership – especially the triad of CEO, CIO, and CRO must act as role models and show continuous engagement.
• Clear Risk Strategy and Appetite: Explicit definition and communication of ICT risk appetite is fundamental for all downstream decisions and prioritizations in ICT risk management.
• Resource Commitment: Adequate allocation of budget, personnel, and time is crucial – companies with successful DORA implementation typically invest 15‑20% more than the industry average in their ICT risk management capacities.
• Integrated Transformation Approach: Treating DORA implementation as a holistic transformation program rather than an isolated compliance project is a central success factor for sustainable effectiveness.

⚠ ️ Typical Pitfalls and Avoidance Strategies:

• Overcoming Silo Thinking: Isolated consideration of DORA as a pure IT or compliance topic is one of the most common mistakes. Instead, a cross-functional approach is required that involves all relevant stakeholders.
• Avoiding Compliance Theater: Superficial implementations that only exist on paper but are not anchored in operational reality lead to increased risks and regulatory problems in the long term.
• Balance Between Perfection and Pragmatism: Attempting to immediately establish perfect ICT risk management often leads to delays and over-complexity. An iterative approach with clear prioritization is more successful.
• Underestimating Cultural Change: Neglecting the necessary cultural transformation is a major reason for the failure of DORA implementations – technical solutions alone are insufficient.

⏱ ️ Time Horizon and Milestones:

• Realistic Time Planning: Complete implementation of mature DORA-compliant ICT risk management is a multi-year undertaking – successful companies typically plan in 18‑36 month horizons with clearly defined maturity levels.
• Identifying Quick Wins: Parallelization of long-term structural changes with short-term achievable improvements that deliver early visible results and generate momentum.
• Maturity-Based Roadmap: Development of a staged implementation roadmap that defines different maturity levels and enables gradual evolution of ICT risk management.
• Regular Progress Measurement: Establishment of clear KPIs and regular reviews at C-level to monitor implementation progress and adjust as needed.

🔮 Ensuring Long-Term Sustainability:

• Ownership and Incentive Systems: Anchoring ICT risk responsibility in all relevant roles and creating incentive systems that reward proactive risk management.
• Continuous Improvement Process: Institutionalization of an explicit cycle of assessment, adaptation, and optimization of ICT risk management.
• Knowledge Management and Skill Development: Building systematic knowledge management and continuous development of required competencies at all levels.
• Regular External Validation: Conducting independent assessments and benchmarking to avoid operational blindness and promote continuous improvement.

What technological solutions are crucial for effective DORA-compliant ICT risk management and how can they be strategically aligned?

Implementing DORA-compliant ICT risk management requires a well-thought-out technology stack that meets regulatory requirements while generating business value. Technology selection should not just be a reaction to compliance requirements but a strategic investment in your organization's digital resilience. ADVISORI supports you in this technological transformation.

🧩 Core Components of a DORA-Compliant Technology Stack:

• Integrated GRC Platforms: The foundation is modern Governance, Risk & Compliance platforms specifically optimized for DORA requirements and providing a central repository for all relevant risk information.
• Security Information & Event Management (SIEM): Advanced SIEM solutions with AI-powered anomaly detection and automated response capabilities are essential for the continuous monitoring required by DORA.
• Vulnerability Management Tools: Solutions for automated identification, prioritization, and remediation of vulnerabilities are crucial for proactive ICT risk management according to DORA.
• Automated Risk Assessment Engines: Technologies that enable continuous, data-driven risk assessments and support the entire risk lifecycle from identification to treatment.

📈 Strategic Alignment of Technology Investments:

• Business-Risk Alignment: Aligning technology investments with the specific risk profiles of your critical business processes and assets rather than a one-size-fits-all solution.
• Scalable Architecture: Implementation of a modular, scalable architecture that can keep pace with evolving DORA requirements and your business growth.
• API-First Approach: Prioritizing solutions with robust API capabilities that enable seamless integration into your existing IT landscape and flexible expansion.
• Future-Proof Investments: Favoring technologies that not only meet current DORA requirements but also anticipate future developments through advanced analytical capabilities and adaptive learning abilities.

🤖 Potential of Advanced Technologies:

• AI and Machine Learning: Leverage AI-powered solutions for predictive risk analyses, automated control testing, and intelligent anomaly detection to move from reactive to proactive risk management.
• Robotic Process Automation (RPA): Automation of repetitive compliance activities such as data aggregation, standard reporting, and routine-based control testing to increase efficiency and reduce human errors.
• Natural Language Processing: Use of NLP technologies for automated analysis of regulatory texts, internal policies, and audit reports for more efficient compliance management.
• Blockchain for Immutable Audit Trails: Consider blockchain technology for critical areas where tamper-proof records are essential for regulatory evidence.

⚖ ️ Make vs. Buy Decision Criteria:

• Criticality and Differentiation: Development of customized solutions for areas that are business-critical or offer differentiation potential; use of standard solutions for general compliance functions.
• Total Cost of Ownership: Comprehensive assessment of long-term costs considering implementation, customization, integration, operation, and continuous development.
• Expertise Availability: Consideration of internal competencies for development and operation of specialized solutions versus use of standard products with established support ecosystem.
• Market Maturity: Evaluation of the maturity and stability of available market solutions for specific DORA requirements compared to the risk of own development.

How do we design the reporting and KPIs of our ICT risk management to give the C-Suite clear insight into our digital resilience according to DORA?

Effective ICT risk management reporting translates complex technical details into strategically relevant insights that enable the C-Suite to make informed decisions. DORA establishes specific requirements for reporting to the management body, but goes beyond pure compliance – strategically aligned reporting creates real value for corporate leadership. ADVISORI supports you in developing a customized reporting framework.

🎯 Strategic KPIs for the C-Suite:

• Digital Resilience Score: An aggregated index that maps your organization's overall digital resilience on a scale of 1‑100, based on weighted factors such as ICT risk maturity level, control effectiveness, and incident response capabilities.
• Risk Exposure vs. Risk Appetite: Visualization of current ICT risk exposure in relation to the risk appetite defined by the management body, highlighting areas requiring special attention.
• Resilience Return on Investment (RROI): Quantification of the financial benefit of investments in digital resilience by comparing costs with avoided risks/damages.
• Strategic Project Risk Index: Assessment of ICT risks for strategic initiatives and transformation projects with traffic light system and trend analysis.

📊 Dashboard Design for Maximum Impact:

• Executive Summary Layer: A highly aggregated overview with a maximum of 5‑7 key indicators that provides an immediate overview of digital resilience status.
• Drill-Down Functionality: Ability for the C-Suite to navigate from the overview level to more detailed information levels as needed, without being overwhelmed by technical details.
• Benchmark Integration: Incorporation of industry benchmarks and best practices to illustrate your organization's relative position in the competitive environment.
• Forward-Looking Perspective: Complementing the current risk situation with predictive analyses and trend indicators that signal emerging risks and developments early.

🔄 Reporting Frequency and Mechanisms:

• Multi-Layered Reporting Model: Implementation of a tiered reporting model with monthly dashboard updates, quarterly in-depth reviews, and annual strategic risk assessments.
• Event-Based Escalation: Complementing regular reporting with event-driven notifications for significant risk changes or threshold breaches.
• Integrated Governance Meetings: Establishment of a fixed agenda item for ICT risks in existing board meetings rather than isolated risk meetings to promote integration into business strategy.
• Bidirectional Information Flow: Creation of mechanisms for feedback and guidance from the C-Suite back to the ICT risk management function.

🧠 From Data to Insights and Actions:

• Narrative-Based Reports: Complementing quantitative KPIs with qualitative analyses and narratives that explain relationships and show action options.
• Decision Support Elements: Integration of decision support elements such as scenario analyses, impact assessments, and cost-benefit considerations for risk mitigation measures.
• Action-Oriented Design: Clear linking of risk indicators with concrete action recommendations and responsibilities.
• Cultural Dimension: Inclusion of indicators for risk culture and risk-aware behavior in the organization as early warning indicators for potential problems.

What should our roadmap for the gradual implementation of DORA-compliant ICT risk management look like, and what quick wins can we achieve early?

Implementing DORA-compliant ICT risk management is a complex transformation that requires a structured, prioritized approach. A well-thought-out roadmap balances regulatory compliance requirements with strategic value creation and enables both quick successes and sustainable improvements. ADVISORI supports you in developing a customized implementation roadmap that considers your specific context.

🗺 ️ Phase Model for Implementation:

• Phase 1: Foundation (3‑6 Months) - Gap analysis and maturity assessment of existing ICT risk management - Development of ICT risk management strategy and governance model - Definition of risk appetite and tolerances for ICT risks - Establishment of an initial risk inventory and risk taxonomy
• Phase 2: Framework Establishment (6‑12 Months) - Implementation of ICT risk management framework and core processes - Development of methodologies for risk assessment and treatment - Building first-line support for ICT risk management in business units - Implementation of basic functions for monitoring and reporting
• Phase 3: Operationalization (12‑18 Months) - Complete integration into existing business processes and IT systems - Automation of key ICT risk management processes - Refinement of metrics and KPIs for risk management and reporting - Development of advanced analytical capabilities for ICT risks
• Phase 4: Optimization and Excellence (18+ Months) - Continuous improvement based on experiences and feedback - Integration of predictive analytics and AI-based risk detection - Development of advanced scenarios for stress tests and resilience checks - Establishment as a pioneer and thought leader in ICT risk management

🚀 Prioritization Logic and Quick Wins:

• Value-Risk-Effort Matrix: Use of a structured prioritization matrix that balances regulatory requirements, risk reduction, and implementation effort.
• Quick Win

1

• ICT Risk Inventory: Development of a comprehensive inventory of ICT risks as foundation for all further activities – typically achievable in 4‑8 weeks with significant added value.
• Quick Win

2

• Executive Dashboard: Implementation of an initial C-level dashboard for ICT risks that uses and consolidates already available data – creates immediate visibility and engagement.
• Quick Win

3

• DORA Training Program: Rapid development and rollout of a tiered awareness program for different stakeholder groups – increases risk awareness in the organization.
• Quick Win

4

• Critical Third-Party Assessment: Prioritized assessment of the most critical IT service providers according to DORA requirements – addresses a key risk with manageable effort.

🧩 Modular Implementation Approach:

• Parallel Workstreams: Organization of implementation in parallel work streams (governance, processes, technology, culture) that are coordinated but can progress at their own pace.
• Iterative Approach: Implementation in MVPs (Minimum Viable Products) and iterative improvement rather than perfection in first implementation – enables faster value creation and continuous learning.
• Piloting: Testing new approaches and methods in selected business areas before enterprise-wide rollout – reduces risks and enables adjustments.
• Flexible Scaling: Development of implementation models that can be adapted depending on size, complexity, and criticality of business areas.

📋 Success Factors for Roadmap Implementation:

• Dedicated Transformation Team: Establishment of a specialized team with clear mandate and direct reporting line to the C-Suite for steering DORA implementation.
• Transparent Tracking: Establishment of transparent progress monitoring with regular status updates to all relevant stakeholders.
• Adaptability: Planning regular roadmap reviews and adjustments based on experiences, regulatory developments, and changing business requirements.
• Stakeholder Engagement: Continuous involvement of all relevant stakeholders from the C-Suite to operational teams to ensure alignment and commitment.

How can we effectively design DORA-compliant ICT risk management for our cloud transformation and increasing use of AI/ML technologies?

Cloud transformation and the use of AI/ML technologies present financial institutions with particular challenges in the context of DORA-compliant ICT risk management. These advanced technologies offer enormous opportunities for innovation and efficiency but require a reconception of traditional risk management approaches. ADVISORI supports you in developing future-proof ICT risk management that both meets DORA requirements and promotes your digital transformation.

☁ ️ ICT Risk Management for Cloud Transformation:

• Multi-Cloud Governance Framework: Development of a specific governance model for multi-cloud environments that defines clear responsibilities, cloud-specific controls, and risk indicators.
• Shared Responsibility Mapping: Detailed mapping of the Shared Responsibility Model with clear assignment of risk responsibilities between your organization and cloud providers – a critical aspect for DORA compliance.
• Cloud Security Posture Management: Implementation of automated tools for continuous monitoring and enforcement of security and compliance policies across all cloud environments.
• Cloud-Native Controls Framework: Development of a special control framework for cloud environments that translates traditional controls into cloud-native equivalents and addresses new cloud-specific risks.

🧠 Risk Management for AI/ML Systems:

• AI Governance System: Establishment of a dedicated governance framework for AI/ML systems that defines ethical principles, transparency requirements, and specific risk management practices.
• Model Risk Management: Implementation of a structured process for identifying, assessing, and mitigating risks throughout the lifecycle of AI/ML models – from development to production deployment.
• Explainability Mechanisms: Development of methods to create transparency and traceability of AI decisions to meet regulatory requirements and build trust.
• Bias Monitoring: Establishment of continuous monitoring mechanisms to detect and correct biases in AI/ML systems to ensure fair and compliant decision processes.

🔄 Integration of Modern Technologies into DORA Frameworks:

• Tech-Augmented ICT Risk Management: Using AI and automation to strengthen ICT risk management itself – e.g., through automated anomaly detection, predictive risk analyses, and intelligent compliance monitoring systems.
• Continuous Compliance Monitoring: Implementation of real-time compliance monitoring for cloud and AI systems through API-based integrations and automated control testing.
• DevSecOps for Cloud and AI: Integration of security and compliance requirements directly into CI/CD pipelines and MLOps processes to enable 'Compliance as Code' and 'Security as Code'.
• Dynamic Risk Assessment: Development of methodologies for continuous, dynamic reassessment of risks in rapidly changing cloud and AI environments instead of static, periodic assessments.

🛡 ️ Strategies for Resilient Cloud and AI Architectures:

• Zero Trust Security Model: Implementation of a zero-trust approach for cloud and AI systems that requires continuous authentication, authorization, and encryption at all levels.
• Design for Failure: Development of cloud architectures according to the 'Design for Failure' principle with automatic error correction, regional redundancy, and degraded functionality instead of complete failures.
• AI Resilience Engineering: Application of resilience engineering principles to AI/ML systems, including Robust AI Design, fallback mechanisms, and continuous testing of adversarial scenarios.
• Immutable Infrastructure: Use of Infrastructure as Code and immutable deployment strategies to maximize consistency, repeatability, and auditability of cloud environments.

How can we position DORA-compliant ICT risk management as a competitive advantage with customers and investors?

Proactive, DORA-compliant ICT risk management can be positioned far beyond pure compliance as a strategic competitive advantage and differentiating feature. Through skillful communication and anchoring in market positioning, you can both strengthen customer trust and optimize investor relations. ADVISORI supports you in converting your investments in digital resilience into measurable business value.

🎯 Positioning with Customers and Business Partners:

• Trust by Design: Development of a trust-based communication strategy that makes your investments in DORA-compliant processes and technologies transparent and anchors them as part of your value proposition.
• Resilience Certificate: Introduction of a resilience certificate for your products and services that attests to compliance with the highest standards in ICT risk management and is communicated as a quality feature.
• Customer-Facing Dashboards: Provision of customer-specific dashboards that provide real-time insight into relevant resilience metrics, creating transparency and trust.
• Proactive Communication: Integration of DORA compliance and digital resilience into your marketing messages, sales materials, and customer presentations as a unique selling proposition.

💼 Strategic Advantages in B2B:

• Simplified Due Diligence: Positioning your DORA compliance as a competitive advantage in tenders and contract negotiations by accelerating due diligence processes on the customer side.
• Supply Chain Resilience: Using your advanced ICT risk management as an argument with larger business customers who increasingly demand the highest standards in digital resilience from their suppliers.
• Regulatory Spillover Effect: Highlighting how your DORA compliance also helps customers outside the financial sector meet their own regulatory requirements and minimize cyber risks in the supply chain.
• Contractual Advantages: Using your advanced ICT risk management capabilities to negotiate more favorable contract terms, especially in liability and damages clauses.

📈 Investor Relevance and Capital Market Effects:

• ESG Integration: Positioning your DORA-compliant ICT risk management as an essential component of your ESG strategy, especially in the governance area, to gain access to ESG-focused investment funds.
• Risk-Adjusted Valuation Models: Proactive communication with analysts about the impact of your advanced ICT risk management on risk profiles and thus on risk-adjusted performance metrics.
• Investor Relations Narrative: Development of a compelling narrative for investor presentations that illustrates the connection between ICT risk management, business continuity, and long-term value creation.
• Crisis Resistance Story: Using your DORA compliance as evidence of your business model's crisis resistance during phases of increased market volatility or specific cyber threat scenarios.

🌟 Long-Term Brand Positioning and Thought Leadership:

• Content Strategy: Establishing yourself as a thought leader in digital resilience through high-quality content, whitepapers, case studies, and conference contributions on your experiences with DORA implementation.
• Industry Benchmarking: Initiating or participating in industry benchmarking initiatives for digital resilience where your company is positioned as a reference point.
• Strategic Partnerships: Building co-marketing initiatives with technology providers and consulting firms that use your advanced ICT risk management practices as best-practice examples.
• Talent Attraction: Using your leading position in ICT risk management as a differentiating factor in the war for talent to attract top specialists in cybersecurity, risk management, and IT.

What specific organizational changes and governance structures are required for successful DORA implementation?

Implementing DORA-compliant ICT risk management requires fundamental changes in organizational structures and governance models. These organizational adjustments are not only crucial for regulatory compliance but also create the foundation for sustainable digital resilience. ADVISORI supports you in developing and implementing a customized governance model that both meets DORA requirements and can be optimally integrated into your existing structures.

🏛 ️ Evolutionary Governance Models for DORA:

• Modernized Three Lines Model: Further development of the classic three-lines-of-defense model with fluid transitions between defense lines, clear responsibility assignment, and intensive collaboration instead of rigid silos.
• Dedicated Digital Resilience Function: Establishment of a central, independent function for digital resilience with direct reporting line to the management body and horizontal networking with all relevant business areas.
• ICT Risk Committee: Establishment of a specialized committee at the highest decision-making level that meets regularly and bears overall responsibility for ICT risks and DORA compliance.
• Cross-Functional Teams: Formation of permanent cross-functional teams from business, IT, risk management, and compliance that work together on specific DORA implementation streams.

👥 Roles, Responsibilities, and Qualifications:

• C-Level Ownership: Explicit assignment of DORA responsibility at C-level, typically with the CIO, CISO, or CRO, with regular reporting to the entire board.
• Digital Resilience Officer (DRO): Creation of a new leadership role as a central coordination point for all DORA-relevant activities with direct access to the management body.
• ICT Risk Owners in Business Units: Nomination of dedicated ICT risk officers in all relevant business units to operationalize risk responsibility in the first line of defense.
• Qualification Strategy: Development of a comprehensive training and certification program for all involved employees, with specific qualification profiles depending on role and responsibility.

📋 Processes and Decision Structures:

• Integrated Risk Management Process: Development of an end-to-end process for ICT risk management that is seamlessly integrated into existing risk management and governance processes.
• Escalation Mechanisms: Establishment of clear, multi-level escalation paths for ICT risks with defined thresholds and responsibilities.
• Decision-Making Framework: Implementation of a structured decision framework for ICT risks that defines roles, authorities, and responsibilities for different types of decisions.
• Policy Governance: Building a coherent set of rules with hierarchically structured policies, standards, and procedures that is regularly reviewed and updated.

🔄 Integration into Existing Structures:

• Enterprise Risk Management Alignment: Harmonization of ICT risk management with overarching enterprise risk management through common taxonomies, methodologies, and reporting structures.
• Regulatory Oversight Integration: Seamless integration of DORA governance into existing supervisory structures and processes to avoid redundancies and leverage synergies.
• IT & Security Governance Consolidation: Merging and optimizing existing IT and security governance structures under the umbrella of the DORA-compliant framework.
• Compliance Function Coordination: Clear coordination of responsibilities between the compliance function and ICT risk management, especially regarding regulatory monitoring and reporting.

How can we evaluate the effectiveness of our DORA-compliant ICT risk management system and continuously improve it?

Continuous evaluation and further development of your DORA-compliant ICT risk management is crucial for long-term compliance and business resilience. A systematic approach to maturity measurement and continuous improvement enables you to go beyond mere fulfillment of regulatory minimum requirements and achieve real value creation. ADVISORI supports you with proven methods and tools in the evolution of your ICT risk management into a strategic asset.

📊 Maturity Models and Assessment Frameworks:

• DORA Maturity Model: Application of a specific, multi-dimensional maturity model for DORA compliance that assesses the five core areas (Governance, Identification, Protection, Detection, Response & Recovery) on an evolution from initial/ad-hoc to optimized/strategic.
• Capability-Based Assessment Methodology: Differentiated assessment of the maturity of individual capabilities within ICT risk management to prioritize targeted improvement measures.
• Benchmark-Supported Evaluation: Regular comparison of own maturity levels with industry benchmarks and best practices to identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
• Multidimensional Scorecard: Development of a balanced scorecard that includes both qualitative and quantitative metrics for assessing ICT risk management.

🔍 Audit and Testing Mechanisms:

• Integrated Audit Approach: Establishment of a holistic audit approach that combines internal audit, external audits, and continuous monitoring to obtain a comprehensive picture of effectiveness.
• Control Testing Framework: Implementation of a systematic, risk-based testing procedure for ICT controls with defined testing frequencies, methods, and evaluation criteria.
• Incident-Based Review: Systematic analysis of all ICT-related incidents and near-misses as an indicator of weaknesses in ICT risk management and starting point for improvements.
• Resilience Exercises and Stress Tests: Conducting regular, realistic exercises and simulations to test the effectiveness of protection, detection, and response mechanisms under various stress scenarios.

🔄 Continuous Improvement Processes:

• PDCA Cycles for DORA: Application of the Plan-Do-Check-Act cycle to all components of ICT risk management with clearly defined responsibilities and timeframes for each step.
• Lessons Learned Integration: Systematic capture and implementation of insights from incidents, exercises, audits, and best-practice developments into continuous improvement initiatives.
• Technology Radar for Risk Management: Establishment of proactive monitoring of new technologies and methods in ICT risk management for continuous innovation.
• Agile Improvement Sprints: Organization of continuous improvement in time-limited, focused sprints with clear goals and measurable results.

📝 Documentation and Knowledge Management:

• Integrated GRC Repository: Building a central repository for all relevant documents, evidence, controls, and measures with clear versioning and access management.
• Process Mining for Compliance: Use of process mining technologies for automated analysis of actual processes compared to defined target processes.
• Knowledge Graphs for ICT Risks: Development of semantic networks for visualizing and analyzing complex relationships between assets, threats, controls, and risks.
• Automated Compliance Evidence: Implementation of tools for continuous, automated capture and preparation of compliance evidence for internal and external audits.

How should we plan the budget and resources for DORA-compliant ICT risk management and justify them to the board?

Implementing DORA-compliant ICT risk management requires significant investments in personnel, technology, and processes. Strategic budget planning and convincing communication to the board are crucial to secure necessary resources and ensure long-term value creation. ADVISORI supports you in developing a business case that connects regulatory requirements with strategic added value.

💰 Structured Budget Planning and Allocation:

• Phase-Oriented Budgeting: Development of a multi-year investment plan with different phases (Foundation, Implementation, Optimization) and clearly defined budget for each phase.
• Categorized Cost Structure: Breakdown of investments into key categories such as personnel, technology, consulting, training, and operational costs for transparent decision-making.
• Risk-Based Resource Allocation: Distribution of budget based on prioritized risk assessment, with higher investments in areas with more critical risks or larger compliance gaps.
• Flexible Budget Framework: Establishment of a budgeting approach that separates basic compliance requirements from strategic improvement initiatives and enables flexible adjustments.

📊 ROI Calculation and Business Case:

• Multidimensional ROI Model: Development of an ROI model that considers both quantitative factors (cost savings, risk reduction) and qualitative aspects (reputation, strategic positioning).
• Risk-Cost-Benefit Analysis: Structured analysis that compares potential costs of ICT incidents, regulatory sanctions, and reputational damage with investment costs in DORA compliance.
• Opportunity Cost Assessment: Assessment of opportunity costs of inadequate compliance, including potential competitive disadvantages, market share losses, and delayed innovation.
• Long-Term Value Creation Analysis: Presentation of how investments in DORA compliance can lead to efficiency gains, competitive advantages, and new business opportunities in the long term.

💼 Board-Level Communication and Buy-In:

• Executive Summary Dashboard: Development of a concise, visually appealing dashboard that summarizes the most important aspects of the DORA investment plan for board members.
• Risk Exposure Visualization: Visualization of current ICT risks and potential impacts on business objectives to illustrate the urgency of investments.
• Regulatory Compliance Timeline: Presentation of the regulatory roadmap with clear deadlines and consequences of non-compliance to create action pressure.
• Strategic Alignment Narrative: Development of a narrative framework that links DORA investments with overarching corporate strategy and long-term vision.

📈 Performance Tracking and Value Demonstration:

• Investment Tracking Framework: Establishment of a transparent framework for continuous monitoring and reporting on the use and effectiveness of DORA investments.
• Value Realization Milestones: Definition of clear, measurable milestones for value realization that are regularly reviewed and communicated to the board.
• Business Impact KPIs: Development of specific KPIs that measure the business benefit of DORA investments, such as improved system availability, reduced incident costs, or increased customer satisfaction.
• Adaptive Budgeting: Implementation of an agile budgeting process that enables regular reviews and adjustments based on actual progress and changing priorities.

What role do cyber insurances play in the context of DORA-compliant ICT risk management and how can we optimally integrate them?

Cyber insurances in the context of DORA-compliant ICT risk management are not just a financing instrument for residual risks but a strategic element of a comprehensive risk management strategy. Skillful integration of insurance solutions into ICT risk management can create significant synergies and competitive advantages. ADVISORI supports you in optimal design and integration of your insurance strategy.

🔄 Strategic Integration of Insurances into ICT Risk Management:

• Risk Transfer Framework: Development of a structured decision framework that defines which ICT risks should be treated internally, which transferred, and which accepted, based on risk quantification and cost-benefit analysis.
• Insurance-by-Design Approach: Early inclusion of insurance considerations already in the design phase of ICT systems and processes to ensure optimal insurability.
• Insurance-Supported Risk Management: Using the expertise and services of insurers to improve your ICT risk management through access to specialists, threat intelligence, and best practices.
• Dynamic Insurance Portfolio: Establishment of a flexible insurance portfolio that is continuously adapted to the changing ICT risk landscape and the evolution of your digital infrastructure.

📋 Requirements for DORA-Compliant Cyber Insurances:

• Regulatory Compliance Coverage: Ensuring that your cyber insurances explicitly cover regulatory requirements and compliance aspects of DORA, including potential fines and reputational damage.
• ICT Third-Party Coverage: Integration of specific coverage for risks from third-party relationships, especially for cloud services and critical ICT service providers according to DORA definition.
• Incident Response Support: Agreement of comprehensive incident response services as part of the insurance package that can be seamlessly integrated into your DORA-compliant incident management processes.
• Resilience Testing Coverage: Coverage of risks and costs related to the advanced resilience tests required by DORA, including potential unintended consequences of tests.

💼 Insurance-Based Competitive Advantages:

• Preferential Conditions: Using your DORA-compliant ICT risk management as an argument for improved insurance conditions, lower premiums, and higher coverage amounts.
• Captive Insurance Solutions: Evaluation of specialized insurance structures such as captives for ICT risks that combine cost-effective risk bearing with customized coverage.
• Joint Risk Assessment: Establishment of joint risk assessment processes with insurers that both improve the quality of your risk management and optimize insurance costs.
• Reputation Enhancement: Strategic communication of your comprehensive ICT risk management strategy including high-quality insurance coverage as a trust signal to customers and partners.

🔍 Due Diligence and Insurance Selection:

• Insurance Gap Analysis: Conducting a comprehensive gap analysis between your current insurance solutions and the specific requirements of DORA-compliant ICT risk management.
• Carrier Assessment Framework: Development of a structured assessment framework for insurers that considers their financial stability, expertise in ICT risks, and understanding of DORA requirements.
• Policy Wording Expertise: Careful review and negotiation of specific insurance terms to ensure that all relevant ICT risks are adequately covered without hidden exclusions.
• Total Cost of Risk Optimization: Consideration of total cost of risk beyond premiums, including deductibles, internal administration and compliance costs, and potential losses from uninsured risks.

How can we ensure that our ICT risk management is harmonized with relevant industry standards (ISO 27001, NIST, etc.) while meeting specific DORA requirements?

Integrating DORA requirements into existing ICT risk management based on industry standards requires a strategic harmonization approach. Through skillful coordination, redundancies can be avoided, synergies leveraged, and a coherent governance framework created. ADVISORI supports you in developing an integrated approach that connects regulatory compliance with best practices from leading standards.

🔄 Strategic Standards Harmonization:

• Mapping & Gap Analysis: Creation of detailed mapping between DORA requirements and relevant controls from industry standards (ISO 27001, NIST CSF, COBIT, etc.) to identify overlaps and specific DORA gaps.
• Integrated Control Framework: Development of a consolidated control catalog that harmonizes DORA requirements with established frameworks and creates a unified language and structure for all compliance activities.
• Standards Hierarchy: Establishment of a clear hierarchy between different standards and regulations that defines priorities for conflict situations and specifies strategic alignment.
• Evolution Management: Implementation of a systematic process for continuous monitoring and integration of changes to standards and regulatory requirements into your ICT risk management.

📋 Synergies with Leading Industry Standards:

• ISO 27001 / ISO 27005: Using the established ISMS framework as a foundation, supplemented by DORA-specific elements such as extended resilience tests, specialized third-party management, and detailed incident reporting requirements.
• NIST Cybersecurity Framework: Integration of the practical, risk-oriented approach of NIST with its five core functions (Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover) as a structure for DORA implementation.
• COBIT for Governance Aspects: Leverage of COBIT's comprehensive IT governance framework for the governance components of DORA, especially for management body responsibilities and alignment with business objectives.
• CIS Controls for Technical Measures: Using the practical, prioritized security controls as a baseline for the technical aspects of DORA-compliant ICT risk management.

📝 Documentation and Evidence Management:

• Unified Compliance Repository: Development of a central repository for all compliance evidence that enables multiple use of the same documentation for different standards and regulations.
• Evidence Mapping Matrix: Creation of a detailed matrix that shows how individual evidence and controls cover multiple compliance requirements from different standards and DORA.
• Integrated Assessments: Combination of audits and assessments for different standards and DORA to reduce redundancies and ensure consistent evaluations.
• Compliance Calendar: Development of a consolidated compliance calendar that integrates all relevant deadlines, reviews, and recertifications for standards and regulatory requirements.

🌐 International Harmonization and Future Development:

• Cross-Border Compliance: Consideration of international regulations (e.g., DORA, SEC requirements, local regulations) and their harmonization for globally operating companies.
• Standards Evolution Monitoring: Establishment of a systematic process for observing and analyzing the evolution of standards and regulations to respond early to changes.
• Compliance by Design: Implementation of an approach where new systems and processes are designed from the ground up to meet both DORA and relevant standards.
• Future-Proof Framework: Development of a flexible, adaptive framework that can be easily adapted to new standards and regulatory requirements without requiring fundamental changes.

What implications does DORA have for our international business activities and how can we ensure globally coherent ICT risk management?

DORA has far-reaching implications for internationally operating financial companies as it sets a new standard for ICT risk management in the EU while interacting with other international regulations. Developing globally coherent ICT risk management that meets local regulatory requirements while ensuring operational efficiency is a complex strategic challenge. ADVISORI supports you in designing a globally harmonized compliance strategy.

🌍 Global Regulatory Landscape and DORA Positioning:

• Extraterritorial Effect of DORA: Analysis of DORA's impact on non-EU companies that offer services in the EU or work with EU financial institutions – especially for critical ICT third-party providers.
• Regulatory Convergence: Identification of global convergence trends in ICT risk management regulations and strategic positioning of DORA compliance as a competitive advantage in other jurisdictions.
• Regulatory Equivalence Assessment: Conducting detailed comparative analyses between DORA and other international regulations (e.g., US SEC regulations, Singapore MAS TRM, Australia APRA CPS 234) to identify commonalities and differences.
• Jurisdictional Risk Mapping: Creation of a detailed overview of specific regulatory risks and requirements in all relevant jurisdictions as a basis for global compliance strategy.

🏗 ️ Architecture of Globally Coherent ICT Risk Management:

• Global Baseline with Local Extensions: Development of a core set of ICT risk management practices as a global baseline, supplemented by jurisdiction-specific extensions for local regulatory requirements.
• Federated Governance Structure: Implementation of a federated governance structure with clear responsibility distribution between global and local teams and defined escalation paths.
• Harmonized Taxonomy and Methodology: Creation of a unified language and methodology for ICT risk management across all regions that simultaneously considers local regulatory terminology.
• Flexible Control Architecture: Development of a flexible control framework that combines a common global core with adaptive regional extensions.

💼 Operational Challenges and Solution Approaches:

• Cross-Border Data Flows: Management of complex data protection and data localization requirements for ICT risk data across different jurisdictions.
• Global vs. Local Resources: Strategic decision on the balance between centralized global teams and local resources for ICT risk management functions.
• Technology Harmonization: Implementation of a globally consistent technology platform for ICT risk management with flexibility for local requirements and regulatory reporting.
• Follow-the-Sun Incident Management: Building globally distributed teams for 24/7 incident management with consistent processes and tools while complying with local reporting obligations.

🔍 Global Oversight and Assurance:

• Global ICT Risk Committee: Establishment of a global committee for ICT risks with representatives from all relevant regions to ensure consistent standards and practices.
• Integrated Assurance Program: Development of a coordinated global assurance program that harmonizes internal and external audits across different regulations and regions.
• Global KRI Dashboard: Implementation of a global KRI dashboard that enables both a consolidated overall view and region-specific insights into ICT risks.
• Regulatory Horizon Scanning: Establishment of a systematic process for early detection of relevant regulatory developments in all jurisdictions to respond proactively to changes.

What benefits does comprehensive, DORA-compliant ICT risk management offer beyond pure compliance for our company's digital transformation?

Comprehensive, DORA-compliant ICT risk management offers far more than just regulatory compliance – it can serve as a strategic enabler for your digital transformation. Integration of robust ICT risk management practices into your transformation strategy creates a solid foundation for innovation, enables secure speed increases, and generates sustainable competitive advantage. ADVISORI supports you in realizing these strategic benefits and positioning ICT risk management as a driver of your digital agenda.

🚀 Acceleration of Digital Transformation:

• Risk-Informed Digital Strategy: Using ICT risk information for informed decisions about digital investments, prioritization of initiatives, and strategic technology selection.
• Security & Resilience by Design: Integration of security and resilience principles in the earliest phases of solution development, avoiding costly subsequent corrections and shortening time-to-market.
• Trust Foundation for Innovation: Creating a solid trust foundation through robust ICT risk management that enables faster and more confident introduction of innovative technologies and business models.
• Legacy Modernization Enablement: Using DORA-compliant risk management as a catalyst for modernizing legacy infrastructures by systematically identifying and prioritizing risks.

💡 Increasing Organizational Intelligence:

• Risk-Aware Culture: Promoting a risk-aware culture that encourages critical thinking, problem anticipation, and proactive risk management throughout the organization.
• Data-Driven Decision Making: Using the risk measurement and analysis capabilities required for DORA to promote data-driven decision processes throughout the organization.
• Organizational Learning: Establishing systematic feedback loops and lessons-learned processes that enable continuous improvement and organizational learning.
• Cross-Functional Collaboration: Promoting intensive collaboration between IT, business, risk management, and other functions through integrated risk governance structures.

⚡ Business and Operational Resilience:

• Business Continuity Enhancement: Significant improvement of business continuity through systematic identification and addressing of single points of failure and critical dependencies.
• Operational Excellence: Increasing operational excellence through improved process quality, reduced disruptions, and higher system availability as a direct result of robust ICT risk management.
• Customer Experience Protection: Securing consistent, high-quality customer experiences by minimizing system failures, performance problems, and security incidents.
• Supply Chain Resilience: Systematic strengthening of the digital supply chain through comprehensive third-party risk management according to DORA requirements.

🔮 Future-Proofing and Strategic Positioning:

• Future-Ready Risk Management: Building adaptive, future-proof risk management framework that can keep pace with new technologies, business models, and regulatory requirements.
• Digital Leadership Positioning: Positioning as a digital market leader through demonstrated ability to implement innovative technologies securely and compliantly.
• Mergers & Acquisitions Readiness: Improved positioning for M&A activities through clear risk transparency, demonstrable digital resilience, and compliant ICT governance.
• Sustainable Innovation: Promoting sustainable, long-term innovation through a framework that provides both adequate controls and necessary room for creative development.

Erfolgsgeschichten

Entdecken Sie, wie wir Unternehmen bei ihrer digitalen Transformation unterstützen

Generative KI in der Fertigung

Bosch

KI-Prozessoptimierung für bessere Produktionseffizienz

Fallstudie
BOSCH KI-Prozessoptimierung für bessere Produktionseffizienz

Ergebnisse

Reduzierung der Implementierungszeit von AI-Anwendungen auf wenige Wochen
Verbesserung der Produktqualität durch frühzeitige Fehlererkennung
Steigerung der Effizienz in der Fertigung durch reduzierte Downtime

AI Automatisierung in der Produktion

Festo

Intelligente Vernetzung für zukunftsfähige Produktionssysteme

Fallstudie
FESTO AI Case Study

Ergebnisse

Verbesserung der Produktionsgeschwindigkeit und Flexibilität
Reduzierung der Herstellungskosten durch effizientere Ressourcennutzung
Erhöhung der Kundenzufriedenheit durch personalisierte Produkte

KI-gestützte Fertigungsoptimierung

Siemens

Smarte Fertigungslösungen für maximale Wertschöpfung

Fallstudie
Case study image for KI-gestützte Fertigungsoptimierung

Ergebnisse

Erhebliche Steigerung der Produktionsleistung
Reduzierung von Downtime und Produktionskosten
Verbesserung der Nachhaltigkeit durch effizientere Ressourcennutzung

Digitalisierung im Stahlhandel

Klöckner & Co

Digitalisierung im Stahlhandel

Fallstudie
Digitalisierung im Stahlhandel - Klöckner & Co

Ergebnisse

Über 2 Milliarden Euro Umsatz jährlich über digitale Kanäle
Ziel, bis 2022 60% des Umsatzes online zu erzielen
Verbesserung der Kundenzufriedenheit durch automatisierte Prozesse

Lassen Sie uns

Zusammenarbeiten!

Ist Ihr Unternehmen bereit für den nächsten Schritt in die digitale Zukunft? Kontaktieren Sie uns für eine persönliche Beratung.

Ihr strategischer Erfolg beginnt hier

Unsere Kunden vertrauen auf unsere Expertise in digitaler Transformation, Compliance und Risikomanagement

Bereit für den nächsten Schritt?

Vereinbaren Sie jetzt ein strategisches Beratungsgespräch mit unseren Experten

30 Minuten • Unverbindlich • Sofort verfügbar

Zur optimalen Vorbereitung Ihres Strategiegesprächs:

Ihre strategischen Ziele und Herausforderungen
Gewünschte Geschäftsergebnisse und ROI-Erwartungen
Aktuelle Compliance- und Risikosituation
Stakeholder und Entscheidungsträger im Projekt

Bevorzugen Sie direkten Kontakt?

Direkte Hotline für Entscheidungsträger

Strategische Anfragen per E-Mail

Detaillierte Projektanfrage

Für komplexe Anfragen oder wenn Sie spezifische Informationen vorab übermitteln möchten