Sustainable Regulatory Excellence
MaRisk Ongoing Compliance
Maintain continuous MaRisk compliance through systematic monitoring, proactive adaptation to regulatory changes, and sustainable compliance management. Our comprehensive approach ensures your organization remains compliant while optimizing compliance processes and reducing regulatory risk.
- ✓Continuous Compliance Monitoring and Regulatory Change Management
- ✓Proactive Adaptation to Evolving MaRisk Requirements
- ✓Automated Compliance Reporting and Documentation
- ✓Sustainable Compliance Culture and Process Optimization
Your strategic success starts here
Our clients trust our expertise in digital transformation, compliance, and risk management
30 Minutes • Non-binding • Immediately available
For optimal preparation of your strategy session:
- Your strategic goals and objectives
- Desired business outcomes and ROI
- Steps already taken
Or contact us directly:
Certifications, Partners and more...
Sustainable MaRisk Compliance & Continuous Monitoring
Our Strengths
- Extensive experience with MaRisk and related regulations (BAIT, ZAIT, etc.)
- Combined expertise in regulation, risk management, and process optimization
- Proven methods and tools for efficient compliance management
- Broad experience from different institutions of various sizes and business models
⚠
Expert Insight
Ongoing compliance goes far beyond mere rule adherence. Successful MaRisk compliance requires integration of regulatory requirements into daily business processes and creation of risk-aware corporate culture.
ADVISORI in Numbers
11+
Years of Experience
120+
Employees
520+
Projects
We follow a systematic, continuous approach to MaRisk compliance that ensures sustainable adherence to regulatory requirements:
Our Approach:
Status Quo Analysis
CMS Development
Monitoring Processes
Regulatory Changes
Continuous Optimization
"We support our clients not only in initial implementation of MaRisk requirements but also in continuous development of their compliance processes. Our pragmatic approach combines regulatory requirements with concrete implementation practice – for compliance that works in daily operations and grows with the company."
Andreas Krekel
Head of Risk Management, Regulatory Reporting
Expertise & Experience:
10+ years of experience, SQL, R-Studio, BAIS-MSG, ABACUS, SAPBA, HPQC, JIRA, MS Office, SAS, Business Process Manager, IBM Operational Decision Management
Our Services
We offer you tailored solutions for your digital transformation
Regulatory Monitoring and Impact Analysis
Systematic monitoring of regulatory changes and analysis of their impacts on your institution.
- Monitoring of MaRisk amendments and related regulations
- Analysis of impacts on processes, systems, and documentation
- Prioritization of action areas by risk and effort
- Development of implementation roadmaps for regulatory changes
MaRisk Compliance Management System
Development and optimization of comprehensive system to ensure continuous MaRisk conformity.
- Risk-oriented compliance framework
- Integration into existing GRC processes
- Clear responsibilities and escalation paths
- Efficient reporting and management information
Looking for a complete overview of all our services?
View Complete Service OverviewOur Areas of Expertise in Regulatory Compliance Management
Our expertise in managing regulatory compliance and transformation, including DORA.
DORA Digital Operational Resilience Act
Stärken Sie Ihre digitale operationelle Widerstandsfähigkeit gemäß DORA.
▼
Regulatory Transformation Projektmanagement
Wir steuern Ihre regulatorischen Transformationsprojekte erfolgreich – von der Konzeption bis zur nachhaltigen Implementierung.
▼
Frequently Asked Questions about MaRisk Ongoing Compliance
What does "ongoing compliance" mean in the context of MaRisk?
Ongoing compliance refers to the continuous adherence to Minimum Requirements for Risk Management (MaRisk) beyond initial implementation. It involves regular monitoring, updating of processes, and adaptation to new regulatory requirements to ensure permanent audit readiness.
How often should MaRisk compliance be reviewed?
MaRisk compliance should be reviewed continuously, with formal reviews conducted at least annually. Additionally, ad-hoc reviews are necessary whenever there are significant changes in business activities, risk strategies, or regulatory frameworks.
What are the key challenges in maintaining MaRisk compliance?
Key challenges include keeping up with frequent regulatory updates, ensuring consistent implementation across all business units, managing data quality for risk reporting, and maintaining adequate resources and expertise for compliance tasks.
How can technology support ongoing MaRisk compliance?
Technology can automate monitoring processes, ensure data consistency, and facilitate efficient reporting. RegTech solutions can also help track regulatory changes and map them to internal controls, reducing manual effort and the risk of non-compliance.
What is the role of the compliance function in ongoing MaRisk monitoring?
The compliance function acts as a second line of defense, responsible for monitoring adherence to legal and regulatory requirements. It advises management, identifies compliance risks, and ensures that effective control processes are in place and functioning correctly.
How can we make our self-assessment processes for MaRisk more effective and maximize their added value?
Self-assessments are a central instrument for the continuous monitoring and improvement of MaRisk compliance. However, they are often perceived as a bureaucratic obligation that consumes significant resources without delivering corresponding value. ADVISORI supports you in transforming your self-assessment processes into an effective strategic instrument that delivers genuine insights and drives improvements.
🔄 Methodological foundations of effective self-assessments:
•
Risk-oriented prioritization: Development of a differentiated approach that aligns the frequency, depth, and scope of self-assessments with the risk relevance of the respective MaRisk requirements and organizational units.
•
Balance between standardization and flexibility: Creation of a framework that combines uniform guiding principles with area-specific customization options, ensuring both relevance and comparability.
•
Process orientation instead of checklist mentality: Transition from isolated control questions to process-oriented assessments that consider the entire compliance lifecycle and account for interdependencies between different requirements.
•
Evidence-based evaluation: Establishment of clear criteria and documentation requirements for assessing compliance, minimizing subjective judgments and promoting fact-based evaluation.
🛠 ️ Practical design elements of optimized self-assessments:
•
Modular assessment toolkit: Development of a flexible assessment framework with coordinated modules for various MaRisk subject areas that can be combined as needed.
•
Smart questionnaires: Design of intelligent questionnaires with adaptive logic that selects relevant follow-up questions based on previous answers and skips irrelevant areas.
•
Rotation principle: Implementation of a cyclical approach that examines different compliance aspects at varying time intervals and levels of detail, achieving comprehensive coverage without permanent full-scope assessments.
•
Collaborative assessment formats: Supplementing classic questionnaires with interactive formats such as facilitated workshops or cross-functional reviews that bring together diverse perspectives and enable deeper insights.
📊 Value-adding analysis and utilization:
•
Multi-dimensional analysis methods: Implementation of advanced analytical techniques that go beyond simple compliance scores and identify patterns, trends, and correlations in assessment results.
•
Root cause analysis framework: Development of a structured approach for identifying the root causes of compliance deficiencies that looks beyond symptomatic issues and enables sustainable solutions.
•
Prioritization matrix for measures: Establishment of a systematic framework for evaluating and prioritizing measures based on risk relevance, cost-benefit ratio, and strategic importance.
•
Closed-loop feedback system: Integration of self-assessment results into a continuous improvement cycle with clear accountabilities, timelines, and progress monitoring.
💻 Technological support and efficiency enhancement:
•
Integrated GRC platforms: Evaluation and implementation of suitable technology solutions that support the entire self-assessment process from planning through execution to follow-up.
•
Automated data collection: Identification of opportunities to automatically collect assessment data from systems and processes, reducing manual effort and improving data quality.
•
Dynamic dashboards: Development of interactive visualizations that clearly present compliance status, trends, and risk areas, enabling on-demand drill-downs.
•
Knowledge management integration: Linking self-assessment processes with knowledge databases that provide best practices, regulatory interpretations, and solution approaches.
What approaches does ADVISORI recommend for integrating MaRisk compliance into our existing GRC framework?
Integrating MaRisk compliance into a comprehensive Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) framework is a strategic lever for leveraging synergies, avoiding redundancies, and enhancing the effectiveness of compliance activities. ADVISORI supports you in establishing a smooth connection between your MaRisk-specific compliance requirements and your overarching GRC approach — ensuring both regulatory conformity and operational efficiency.
🔄 Integrated governance structures:
•
Harmonized governance model: Development of a coherent governance architecture that connects MaRisk-specific requirements with overarching GRC structures and defines clear, non-redundant accountabilities.
•
Aligned committee landscape: Optimization of your committee and governance body structure to avoid parallel structures while ensuring MaRisk-specific governance requirements are met.
•
Integrated escalation process: Establishment of a uniform, tiered escalation mechanism for all GRC topics that accounts for the specific requirements of MaRisk (e.g., ad hoc reporting to the Management Board and Supervisory Board).
•
Coordinated mandating: Creation of aligned mandates and rules of procedure for compliance, risk, and governance functions that minimize overlaps and close accountability gaps.
📊 Comprehensive risk and control management:
•
Integrated risk taxonomy: Development of a comprehensive risk categorization model that embeds MaRisk-specific risks within a comprehensive risk framework and makes interdependencies transparent.
•
Harmonized control frameworks: Consolidation of various control frameworks (MaRisk, ICS, ISAE 3402, etc.) into an integrated control catalogue that avoids duplication and increases control efficiency.
•
Consolidated control testing: Development of a coordinated testing approach that examines controls across departments in a methodologically consistent manner while fulfilling the regulatory requirements of various frameworks.
•
Risk control matrix: Creation of a comprehensive mapping of risks to controls across different compliance areas, identifying control redundancies and uncovering control gaps.
📋 Unified processes and methods:
•
Integrated assessment approach: Development of a coordinated assessment framework that methodologically and temporally aligns MaRisk self-assessments with other GRC assessments (e.g., ICS self-assessments, data protection checks).
•
Consolidated measures management: Establishment of a central process for recording, prioritizing, implementing, and tracking measures from various GRC areas.
•
Harmonized methodological standards: Standardization of methods and criteria for risk identification, assessment, and management across different compliance domains while accounting for MaRisk-specific requirements.
•
Aligned documentation standards: Development of uniform documentation formats and processes that fulfill both generic GRC requirements and MaRisk-specific documentation obligations.
💻 Technological integration and data management:
•
Integrated GRC platform: Evaluation and implementation of a comprehensive GRC technology solution that smoothly connects MaRisk compliance with other GRC activities and enables a 360-degree view.
•
Common information model: Development of a cross-functional data model for GRC information that establishes consistent definitions, classifications, and relationships across different regulatory areas.
•
Unified reporting framework: Creation of integrated reporting that consolidates and covers the regulatory and internal reporting requirements of various compliance areas without redundancy.
•
Master data governance: Establishment of cross-functional master data governance for GRC-relevant data that clearly regulates data ownership and ensures consistent data quality.
How can a risk-oriented approach increase the effectiveness and efficiency of our MaRisk compliance?
A risk-oriented approach to MaRisk compliance is both regulatorily required and operationally sound. Rather than addressing all requirements with equal intensity, it enables the concentration of resources on the material risk areas of your institution. ADVISORI supports you in developing and implementing a tailored risk-oriented compliance approach that meets regulatory expectations while significantly enhancing your compliance efficiency.
🎯 Foundations of a risk-oriented MaRisk compliance approach:
•
Compliance risk assessment framework: Development of a structured methodology for evaluating compliance risks that considers both inherent risk factors and the quality of existing controls.
•
Risk segmentation: Categorization of MaRisk requirements according to their risk relevance for your specific business model, organizational structure, and system landscape.
•
Proportionality principles: Elaboration of clear criteria for applying the supervisory proportionality principle, enabling an appropriate, risk-oriented implementation of MaRisk.
•
Dynamic risk reassessment: Establishment of a process for the continuous reassessment of compliance risks based on internal and external changes, audit findings, and incidents.
📊 Risk-oriented resource allocation and control intensity:
•
Differentiated control strategy: Development of a tiered control approach that adapts control density, frequency, and depth to the respective risk profile and avoids over-control in low-risk areas.
•
Risk-based audit planning: Alignment of self-assessments, internal reviews, and audits with a risk-based prioritization that differentiates audit cycles and scopes.
•
Resource focusing: Systematic allocation of personnel, budget, and technology based on the risk profile of various compliance areas for maximum effectiveness with limited resources.
•
Flexible documentation requirements: Implementation of tiered documentation standards that adapt the scope and level of detail of documentation to the risk relevance of the respective activity.
🛠 ️ Practical implementation approaches:
•
Heat mapping methodology: Development of visual risk heat maps that transparently identify high-risk areas and provide an intuitive basis for prioritization decisions.
•
Risk scoring system: Creation of a quantitative evaluation model that aggregates various risk dimensions into an overall risk score and enables objective comparisons.
•
Scenario-based risk analysis: Execution of structured scenario analyses to assess potential compliance breaches and their impacts as a basis for risk evaluations.
•
Compliance risk indicators: Identification and implementation of meaningful early indicators for compliance risks that provide timely signals of changed risk profiles.
✅ Governance and quality assurance of the risk-oriented approach:
•
Validation mechanisms: Establishment of a regular validation process that reviews the adequacy and effectiveness of the risk-oriented approach and identifies adjustment needs.
•
Management oversight: Development of a transparent reporting framework that provides management with a clear overview of the risk-oriented compliance approach and its outcomes.
•
Supervisory documentation: Creation of comprehensible documentation that transparently justifies and defends the risk-oriented approach to supervisory authorities and auditors.
•
Continuous improvement: Implementation of a continuous improvement cycle that systematically utilizes insights from applying the risk-oriented approach for its further development.
What advantages does digitalized MaRisk compliance offer, and how does ADVISORI support the implementation of technological solutions?
The digitalization of MaRisk compliance offers significant advantages for financial institutions: it reduces manual effort, minimizes error risks, improves traceability, and enables data-driven compliance decisions. ADVISORI supports you in the systematic digitalization of your MaRisk compliance management with a comprehensive approach that equally considers people, processes, and technology.
🔍 Strategic analysis and transformation planning:
•
Digital maturity assessment: Systematic evaluation of the digital maturity of your existing MaRisk compliance processes and systems, and identification of digitalization potentials.
•
Digitalization strategy: Development of a comprehensive roadmap for the digital transformation of your compliance management with clear priorities, milestones, and ROI considerations.
•
Technology selection framework: Creation of structured evaluation criteria for selecting suitable GRC technologies based on your specific requirements, IT strategy, and regulatory requirements.
•
Change management concept: Development of an integrated approach that brings people along in the transformation process and creates the organizational prerequisites for successful digitalization.
🛠 ️ Solution selection and implementation:
•
Requirements management: Systematic collection and prioritization of functional and non-functional requirements for your digital MaRisk compliance solution, incorporating all relevant stakeholders.
•
Vendor selection support: Support in identifying, evaluating, and selecting suitable technology providers through structured RFP processes, product demonstrations, and reference analyses.
•
Implementation accompaniment: Professional project support during the introduction of selected solutions, from detailed design through technical implementation to transition into live operations.
•
Integration and interfaces: Development of solid integration concepts that ensure smooth connectivity to existing systems (ERP, core banking systems, risk management tools, etc.).
📱 Specific digitalization areas and technology solutions:
•
Automated regulatory monitoring: Implementation of intelligent systems for automated monitoring of regulatory changes, their classification, and impact assessment.
•
Digital self-assessments: Introduction of electronic assessment platforms with workflow management, automated validations, and dynamic reporting.
•
Measures management systems: Implementation of digital solutions for the systematic recording, management, and monitoring of compliance measures with integrated reminder and escalation mechanisms.
•
Integrated compliance dashboards: Development of interactive management cockpits that visualize MaRisk compliance status in real time and enable intuitive drill-downs.
🔄 Continuous optimization and future-proofing:
•
AI and automation potentials: Identification and development of application areas for advanced technologies such as AI, machine learning, and RPA in your MaRisk compliance management.
•
Data quality management: Establishment of systematic processes to ensure and continuously improve data quality as the foundation for successful digitalization.
•
Evolutionary advancement: Support in the continuous adaptation and further development of your digital compliance solutions to changing regulatory and business requirements.
•
Digital skills development: Development of targeted qualification measures that empower your employees to optimally utilize and further develop the potentials of digital compliance tools.
How does ADVISORI support the preparation and implementation of new MaRisk amendments?
The regular amendments to MaRisk present financial institutions with recurring challenges. A structured and efficient implementation of new regulatory requirements is critical to minimizing compliance risks while optimizing implementation effort. ADVISORI supports you with a proven, multi-stage approach to the systematic preparation and implementation of MaRisk amendments.
🔍 Early analysis and strategic preparation:
•
Regulatory impact assessment: Detailed analysis of new MaRisk requirements and their specific implications for your institution, taking into account your business model and organizational structure.
•
Gap analysis: Systematic comparison of new requirements with your existing processes, policies, and controls to precisely identify areas requiring action.
•
Measures planning: Development of a structured implementation plan with clear accountabilities, realistic timelines, and efficient resource allocation.
•
Stakeholder management: Early involvement and communication with all relevant stakeholders, from the Management Board through specialist departments to IT and external service providers.
📋 Methodological implementation support:
•
Workstream organization: Establishment of an effective project structure with thematic workstreams that enable the parallel processing of various requirement areas.
•
Conceptual support: Development of tailored technical concepts and methodological approaches for implementing new requirements, taking into account existing structures and institution-specific characteristics.
•
Documentation adaptation: Systematic revision and supplementation of policies, work instructions, and other relevant documents to reflect new regulatory requirements.
•
Proof of compliance: Development of compelling evidence for the implementation of new requirements that will withstand scrutiny during supervisory audits.
🛠 ️ Implementation accompaniment and quality assurance:
•
Process adjustments: Support in adapting existing processes or developing new processes to fulfill amended MaRisk requirements.
•
System implementation: Accompaniment during the implementation of technical requirements, from design through specification to testing and go-live.
•
Change management: Development and execution of training and communication measures to promote the successful introduction and acceptance of new processes and requirements.
•
Quality assurance: Execution of independent reviews and tests to validate implementation and identify any need for adjustment at an early stage.
📊 Reporting and management communication:
•
Management information: Development of transparent and meaningful status reports for the Management Board and Supervisory Board on implementation progress and existing challenges.
•
Supervisory communication: Support in professional communication with supervisory authorities regarding implementation concepts, timelines, and interim solutions.
•
Implementation documentation: Creation of structured documentation of implementation measures as a basis for future supervisory audits and as a starting point for continuous improvements.
•
Lessons learned: Systematic processing of experiences from the implementation project to optimize future regulatory implementations.
How does ADVISORI support branches of foreign institutions in overcoming the particular challenges of MaRisk compliance?
Branch banks and subsidiaries of foreign institutions face specific challenges in MaRisk compliance. They must meet both German requirements and the regulations of their home country and group — often with limited local resources. ADVISORI supports you with tailored approaches that take these particular framework conditions into account and develop pragmatic, proportionate solutions.
🌐 Multi-Regulatory Management:
•
Regulatory Mapping: Creation of structured comparative analyses between MaRisk requirements and the regulations of the home country (e.g. EBA Guidelines, PRA requirements, Fed requirements) to make commonalities and differences transparent.
•
Group-Local Alignment: Development of approaches to harmonise local MaRisk requirements with group-wide guidelines and compliance structures while maintaining local regulatory conformity.
•
Equivalence Analyses: Support in assessing the extent to which group policies and processes can be recognised as equivalent to German MaRisk requirements in order to avoid duplication of effort.
•
Compliance Bridge Concepts: Development of bridge solutions that complement existing group frameworks with specific MaRisk requirements, thereby ensuring efficient overall conformity.
💼 Proportionate Compliance Structures:
•
Flexible Governance: Design of lean yet effective governance structures that meet the particular requirements placed on branch banks (e.g. regarding local management, compliance function).
•
Resource-Efficient Control Concepts: Development of focused, risk-based controls that can be operated effectively with limited local resources while still meeting supervisory expectations.
•
Shared Service Models: Identification of opportunities to cover certain compliance functions at group level or through shared services, with clear definition and documentation of responsibilities.
•
Outsourced Compliance Functions: Support in designing MaRisk-compliant outsourcing solutions for compliance activities while preserving local regulatory responsibility.
📝 Documentation and Evidence Concepts:
•
Modular Documentation Approaches: Development of efficient documentation concepts that meaningfully complement group policies without requiring a complete recreation of all documents.
•
Local Addenda Approach: Creation of local supplements to global guidelines that address specific MaRisk requirements while maintaining consistency with group policies.
•
Audit-Proof Evidence: Design of compelling evidence for local MaRisk compliance that also withstands scrutiny in communications with German supervisory authorities.
•
Bilingual Compliance Documentation: Support in developing bilingual documentation approaches that are comprehensible to both local auditors and the international group.
🔄 Interface and Conflict Management:
•
Group-Local Interface: Design of efficient communication and decision-making processes between the local entity and group level on compliance matters.
•
Regulatory Conflict Management: Development of strategies for handling potentially conflicting requirements between German regulation and home country requirements.
•
Supervisory Dialogue: Support in proactive communication with German supervisory authorities regarding group-based compliance approaches and their equivalence to MaRisk requirements.
•
Audit Coordination: Development of concepts for the efficient coordination of various audit instances (German supervisory authority, home regulator, group audit) with the aim of audit efficiency.
How can ADVISORI help us efficiently manage the interactions between MaRisk and other regulatory requirements (BAIT, GDPR, etc.)?
Financial institutions today face a multitude of overlapping regulatory requirements. In addition to MaRisk, they must simultaneously comply with BAIT, ZAIT, GDPR, KWG, WpHG and numerous other regulatory frameworks, which considerably increases the complexity of compliance management. ADVISORI supports you in understanding these regulatory interactions and developing an integrated, efficient compliance management system.
🔄 Comprehensive Regulatory Mapping:
•
Multi-Regulatory Requirements Analysis: Systematic identification and structuring of overlapping requirements from various regulatory frameworks (MaRisk, BAIT, GDPR, etc.) to create a comprehensive overview.
•
Compliance Intersection Matrix: Development of a detailed matrix that transparently visualises the overlaps, complements and potential conflicts between various regulatory requirements.
•
Regulatory Hierarchy Framework: Development of a clear understanding of the hierarchy and relationships between various regulatory frameworks as a basis for prioritisation and implementation decisions.
•
Gap-Consolidation Analysis: Identification of gaps and redundancies in the implementation of various regulatory requirements in order to identify focus areas for optimisation.
📋 Integrated Compliance Planning and Management:
•
Consolidated Regulatory Change Process: Development of a comprehensive approach to identifying, assessing and implementing regulatory changes across various regulatory frameworks.
•
Integrated Compliance Roadmap: Creation of a cross-cutting plan that coordinates compliance activities for various regulations and systematically utilizes synergies.
•
Prioritisation Framework: Establishment of a structured approach to prioritising compliance measures across various regulatory frameworks, based on risk, urgency and resource efficiency.
•
Synergistic Project Organisation: Design of a project structure that addresses thematically related requirements from various regulatory frameworks in a bundled manner, rather than working in isolated regulatory silos.
🛠 ️ Harmonised Implementation and Controls:
•
Multi-Regulatory Control Integration: Development of consolidated controls that simultaneously address requirements from multiple regulatory frameworks, thereby minimising control redundancies.
•
Integrated Documentation Standards: Design of uniform documentation formats and content that efficiently cover the requirements of various regulations.
•
Coordinated Testing Approaches: Establishment of coordinated testing procedures that review controls for various regulatory areas consistently and resource-efficiently.
•
Unified Assessment Framework: Development of an integrated self-assessment approach that consolidates monitoring and reporting obligations from various regulatory frameworks.
📊 Comprehensive Compliance Reporting and Management:
•
Integrated Compliance Dashboard: Design of a comprehensive management cockpit that transparently visualises compliance status across various regulatory areas.
•
Cross-Regulatory Governance: Development of a coordinated governance structure that harmonises responsibilities and decision-making processes for various compliance areas.
•
Consolidated Supervisory Reporting: Support in developing efficient reporting processes that serve enquiries from various supervisory authorities in a coordinated and resource-efficient manner.
•
Integrated Compliance Metrics: Establishment of uniform key performance indicators for measuring and managing compliance across various regulatory frameworks.
How can we optimally integrate our MaRisk compliance management and outsourcing management?
The integration of MaRisk compliance and outsourcing management is becoming increasingly important for financial institutions, as outsourcing arrangements offer both opportunities for efficiency gains and significant compliance risks. ADVISORI supports you in developing an integrated approach that fulfils regulatory requirements while simultaneously ensuring operational efficiency.
🔄 Integrated Governance Structures:
•
Harmonised Outsourcing and Compliance Framework: Development of a coherent framework that smoothly connects outsourcing management and MaRisk compliance, defining clear responsibilities, processes and controls.
•
Coordinated Committee Structure: Design of an efficient governance structure that addresses both outsourcing and compliance aspects, avoiding unclear responsibilities or duplicate structures.
•
End-to-End Outsourcing Process: Integration of compliance checkpoints into all phases of the outsourcing lifecycle — from decision-making through initiation and implementation to ongoing monitoring and termination.
•
Third-Party Risk Management: Establishment of a comprehensive approach to managing third-party risks that encompasses regulatory, operational, financial and reputational aspects.
🔍 Risk-Based Management of Outsourcing Arrangements:
•
Integrated Risk Assessment Methodology: Development of a structured approach to assessing outsourcing risks that takes into account both MaRisk-specific and general risk aspects.
•
Differentiated Control Approaches: Design of risk-oriented monitoring and control concepts that align the intensity and frequency of controls with the materiality and risk profile of the respective outsourcing arrangement.
•
Exit Strategy Framework: Support in developing solid exit strategies for critical outsourcing arrangements that ensure both operational and regulatory continuity in the event of termination.
•
Resilience Concepts: Development of approaches to strengthening operational resilience for material outsourcing arrangements, including contingency plans and fallback solutions.
📋 Efficient Contract and Relationship Management:
•
Regulatory-Compliant Contract Framework: Development of a contractual framework that standardises and fully covers all MaRisk requirements (information, audit and instruction rights, data protection, contingency concepts, etc.).
•
Service Level Management: Support in defining, measuring and managing appropriate service levels that meet both operational requirements and regulatory expectations.
•
Relationship Management Concept: Design of a structured governance model for the ongoing management of the service provider relationship, with clear communication channels, escalation processes and responsibilities.
•
Performance Management Framework: Development of a comprehensive approach to evaluating service provider performance that takes compliance aspects into account alongside operational KPIs.
🔄 Integrated Monitoring and Reporting:
•
Consolidated Outsourcing Controlling: Establishment of an efficient controlling function that comprehensiveally captures and manages the operational, financial and compliance aspects of outsourcing arrangements.
•
Regulatory Reporting: Support in developing a structured reporting system that delivers both internal management information and fulfils regulatory reporting obligations.
•
Audit and Assessment Concepts: Design of risk-based approaches for the regular review of outsourced activities, ranging from desk reviews and document-based assessments through to on-site audits.
•
Continuous Monitoring: Implementation of systems and processes for the continuous monitoring of the compliance conformity of outsourced activities, with early-stage risk detection.
How can our institution optimally organise and dimension its MaRisk compliance function?
The optimal organisation and dimensioning of the MaRisk compliance function is a central challenge for financial institutions. A function that is too small or inadequately positioned can increase compliance risks, while an oversized structure generates unnecessary costs. ADVISORI supports you in developing a tailored, effective and efficient compliance organisation that is suited to your business model and risk profile.
📋 Organisational Positioning and Governance:
•
Governance Design: Development of an optimal organisational embedding of the compliance function within the three lines of defence, with clear demarcation from other control and monitoring functions.
•
Responsibilities and Accountability Matrix: Creation of a detailed RACI matrix that clearly defines responsibilities and interfaces between compliance, risk management, internal audit and operational units.
•
Reporting Lines: Design of appropriate direct reporting lines from the compliance function to senior management that ensure independence while also guaranteeing effective communication channels.
•
Interface Management: Development of efficient cooperation and exchange models with other control functions (risk management, legal, internal audit) to avoid duplication of effort and information gaps.
🧩 Scope of Tasks and Responsibilities:
•
Function Profiling: Development of a clear functional profile for the compliance function with a focus on its core tasks in accordance with MaRisk and taking into account institution-specific characteristics.
•
Task Prioritisation: Support in the risk-based prioritisation of compliance activities that concentrates limited resources on the material risk areas.
•
Demarcation Concept: Clear definition of the demarcation from other functions, in particular the legal department and risk management, to avoid overlaps or gaps.
•
Delegation Models: Development of appropriate models for delegating certain compliance tasks to operational units while preserving compliance responsibility.
👥 Staffing and Skills Management:
•
Resource Requirements Analysis: Systematic determination of the quantitative and qualitative staffing requirements for the compliance function based on business model, complexity and risk profile.
•
Skill Profiling: Definition of the required capabilities, knowledge and experience for various roles within the compliance function.
•
Recruiting and Development Concepts: Support in developing strategies to attract, develop and retain qualified compliance professionals in a challenging labour market.
•
Training Academy: Design of a structured training and development programme for compliance staff that develops both technical and methodological and interpersonal competencies.
🛠 ️ Methods, Tools and Efficiency Improvements:
•
Process Optimisation: Analysis and optimisation of the core processes of the compliance function with the aim of achieving greater efficiency and effectiveness.
•
Automation and Digitalisation Potential: Identification of opportunities for technological support of compliance work through tools for monitoring, reporting, assessment and documentation.
•
Methods Toolbox: Development of standardised methods and templates for recurring compliance tasks to ensure quality assurance and efficiency gains.
•
Performance Measurement: Establishment of KPIs and measurement procedures for the continuous assessment and optimisation of the compliance function's performance.
How can our institution establish an effective compliance monitoring system for continuous MaRisk compliance?
An effective compliance monitoring system is the cornerstone of sustainable MaRisk compliance. It enables the systematic monitoring of regulatory conformity, the early detection of weaknesses and the targeted management of improvement measures. ADVISORI supports you in developing and implementing a tailored monitoring approach that both meets regulatory requirements and is operationally efficient to implement.
🔍 Strategic Alignment and Framework Concept:
•
Compliance Monitoring Framework: Development of a comprehensive framework that clearly defines the objectives, guiding principles, responsibilities and core processes of compliance monitoring.
•
Risk-Based Focus: Support in prioritising monitoring activities based on a systematic assessment of compliance risks across various business areas and processes.
•
Multi-Tiered Monitoring Concept: Design of a differentiated approach with various monitoring levels, ranging from continuous baseline controls and regular reviews through to more in-depth periodic assessments.
•
Integrated Management Cycle: Development of a closed control loop that systematically connects the planning, execution, evaluation and follow-up of monitoring activities.
🛠 ️ Methodological Components and Instruments:
•
Compliance Control Matrix: Creation of a comprehensive control matrix that links MaRisk requirements with specific controls and defines their responsibilities, frequencies and evidence mechanisms.
•
Key Compliance Indicators (KCIs): Identification and implementation of meaningful indicators that make compliance status continuously measurable and provide early warning of potential compliance risks.
•
Testing Methodology: Development of structured testing procedures for various compliance areas, with standardised test plans, scenarios and assessment criteria.
•
Issue and Action Tracking: Design of a systematic process for recording, categorising, prioritising and tracking identified compliance findings and the resulting measures.
⚙ ️ Processes and Responsibilities:
•
Monitoring Cycles: Establishment of efficient processes for the planning, execution, documentation and follow-up of monitoring activities with clear timelines and milestones.
•
Role Model: Definition of a clear role concept that sets out the responsibilities of various functions in the monitoring process (central compliance, local compliance officers, business units).
•
Escalation Mechanisms: Development of graduated escalation pathways for identified compliance deficiencies that ensure an appropriate and timely response to findings of varying criticality.
•
Management Reporting: Design of meaningful reporting that regularly and on an ad hoc basis keeps management and supervisory bodies informed of compliance status, risks and measures.
💻 Technological Support and Efficiency Improvements:
•
Monitoring Tools: Evaluation and implementation of suitable technology solutions that support the monitoring process from planning and execution through to reporting and follow-up.
•
Automation Potential: Identification of opportunities to automate monitoring activities, such as systematic data analyses, automated controls or rule-based compliance checks.
•
Integration Concepts: Development of approaches to integrating compliance monitoring into existing GRC systems and processes in order to utilize synergies and avoid duplication of effort.
•
Data Analysis Strategies: Support in leveraging advanced data analysis methods to analyse larger volumes of data and identify subtle compliance patterns or risks.
What opportunities does a cross-functional Governance, Risk and Compliance (GRC) framework offer for our MaRisk compliance?
An integrated Governance, Risk and Compliance (GRC) framework offers significant opportunities to make MaRisk compliance more efficient, effective, and value-generating. By systematically interlinking governance structures, risk management, and compliance activities, synergies can be unlocked, resources optimised, and strategic added value generated. ADVISORI supports you in developing and implementing a tailored GRC approach that elevates your MaRisk compliance to a new level.
🔄 Strategic Integration and Synergies:
•
Harmonised Objectives: Development of an integrated target picture that aligns the various GRC areas towards common strategic goals and overcomes siloed thinking.
•
Process Integration: Identification and realisation of synergies between compliance, risk management, and governance processes that reduce duplication of effort and increase efficiency.
•
Consolidated Operating Model: Establishment of a comprehensive operating model that optimally allocates and utilises resources, competencies, and capacities across various GRC functions.
•
Integrated Methodology Base: Development of shared methodological foundations for the various GRC disciplines, from risk analyses and control testing through to measures management.
📊 Comprehensive Risk and Control Management:
•
Enterprise Risk Framework: Support in developing an enterprise-wide risk management approach that systematically links compliance risks with other risk categories.
•
Integrated Risk Assessment: Implementation of a comprehensive risk analysis methodology that evaluates operational, financial, strategic, and compliance risks within a consistent framework.
•
Consolidated Control System: Design of an efficient control framework that eliminates redundancies and ensures that controls cover multiple risk dimensions.
•
Impact Analysis Framework: Development of structured approaches for analysing the impact of business decisions, process changes, or new products across the entire GRC spectrum.
💼 Governance Structures and Decision-Making Processes:
•
Integrated Governance Model: Design of a coherent governance architecture that harmonises oversight, management, and control across the various GRC areas.
•
Streamlined Committee Structure: Optimisation of the committee landscape to avoid fragmentation and promote integrated decision-making across the entire GRC spectrum.
•
Balanced Accountability: Development of a balanced accountability system that establishes clear accountability for the various GRC areas while simultaneously promoting their interplay.
•
Integrated Policy Framework: Creation of a consistent policy hierarchy ranging from the overarching GRC framework through departmental policies to specific guidelines.
📱 Technological Enablers and Data Integration:
•
Integrated GRC Platform: Evaluation and implementation of a comprehensive technology solution that supports all GRC functions on a shared platform.
•
Unified Information Architecture: Development of a unified information architecture that establishes consistent data models, taxonomies, and classifications across all GRC areas.
•
360-Degree Reporting: Design of a comprehensive reporting system that provides management and supervisory bodies with an integrated view of governance, risk, and compliance.
•
Predictive GRC Analytics: Support in leveraging advanced analytical techniques that derive forward-looking insights and recommendations for action from integrated GRC data.
How does ADVISORI support the preparation and accompaniment of Internal Audit for MaRisk audits?
Internal Audit plays a decisive role in the Three-Lines-of-Defense model of MaRisk compliance. As an independent audit body, it must regularly and systematically review the effectiveness and appropriateness of compliance processes and controls. ADVISORI supports both Internal Audit in conducting effective MaRisk audits and the audited units in optimally preparing for such audits.
🔍 Strategic Audit Planning and Preparation:
•
Risk-Based Audit Planning: Support in developing a risk-oriented audit plan that prioritises MaRisk-relevant areas according to their criticality, rate of change, and regulatory relevance.
•
Audit Universe Development: Support in systematically capturing and categorising all audit-relevant MaRisk areas and incorporating them into the audit universe.
•
Audit Methodology: Development of structured audit approaches tailored to MaRisk topics that promote both the effectiveness and efficiency of the audit as well as acceptance of the results.
•
Audit Tools and Resource Planning: Advisory support in selecting and implementing appropriate tools and the efficient allocation of audit resources for MaRisk topics.
📝 Methodological Support During Audit Execution:
•
Audit Guidelines and Work Programmes: Development of tailored audit guidelines and checklists for various MaRisk topic areas that ensure a structured and comprehensive audit.
•
Complex Audit Fields: Specialist support for technically demanding MaRisk topics such as risk model validation, IT risk management, or outsourcing management.
•
Data Analysis Strategies: Support in designing and implementing data-driven audit approaches that efficiently analyse large volumes of data and identify patterns, anomalies, or risks.
•
Quality Assurance: Establishment of quality assurance mechanisms that ensure the consistency, completeness, and solidness of audit findings.
📊 Results Communication and Follow-Up Management:
•
Structured Reporting: Design of meaningful audit reports that clearly prioritise findings, identify root causes, and deliver actionable recommendations.
•
Effective Communication: Support in the persuasive presentation of audit findings to business units, management, and supervisory bodies.
•
Measures Management: Establishment of a structured process for tracking agreed measures, including escalation mechanisms and effectiveness reviews.
•
Continuous Auditing Approach: Development of continuous audit approaches for particularly critical MaRisk areas that enable timely identification of compliance deficiencies.
🛠 ️ Support for Audited Units:
•
Audit Readiness Assessment: Conducting pre-audits or self-assessments that identify and address potential weaknesses prior to the actual audit.
•
Documentation Optimisation: Support in preparing and structuring the documents and evidence relevant to the audit in order to facilitate an efficient audit process.
•
Interview Preparation: Coaching of employees who will be interviewed during audit proceedings to communicate complex MaRisk topics clearly and precisely.
•
Findings Management: Development of a structured methodology for the systematic analysis of audit findings, identification of root causes, and development of sustainable solutions.
What approaches does ADVISORI recommend for effective management of MaRisk documentation?
Structured, current, and accessible documentation is a fundamental pillar of MaRisk compliance and is scrutinised intensively during supervisory reviews. At the same time, the creation and maintenance of documentation ties up considerable resources. ADVISORI supports you in developing an efficient documentation management system that meets regulatory requirements while minimising the associated effort.
📝 Strategic Documentation Concept:
•
Documentation Architecture: Development of a structured documentation hierarchy ranging from overarching frameworks through area-specific policies to detailed work instructions, enabling consistent, redundancy-free documentation.
•
Risk-Based Detailing: Support in determining the appropriate granularity and level of detail for documentation, which is more comprehensive in critical areas and can be kept leaner for less risk-relevant topics.
•
Life-Cycle Management: Establishment of a systematic lifecycle approach for documents, from conception through creation, approval, and regular review to controlled retirement.
•
Regulatory Mapping: Development of a transparent mapping between MaRisk requirements and your documentation that ensures completeness and identifies gaps or redundancies.
🔄 Efficient Documentation Processes:
•
Streamlined Authoring Process: Optimisation of the creation and update process for documents with clear responsibilities, timelines, and quality assurance mechanisms.
•
Approval Workflow: Design of an efficient, risk-appropriate approval and sign-off process that avoids unnecessary administrative hurdles while ensuring adequate control.
•
Change Management: Development of a structured process for identifying, evaluating, and implementing documentation-relevant changes, particularly in response to regulatory updates.
•
Integration into Regulatory Change Process: Systematic interlinking of documentation management with the process for implementing regulatory changes to ensure timely documentation updates.
📚 Documentation Standards and Quality:
•
Template Framework: Development of standardised templates for various document types that ensure consistent structure, quality, and compliance conformity.
•
Style Guide: Creation of guidelines for clear, precise, and comprehensible wording in regulatory documents that promote both technical accuracy and practical applicability.
•
Quality Assurance Mechanism: Establishment of systematic quality assurance processes for documents that verify content accuracy, consistency, and conformity with regulatory requirements.
•
Cross-Referencing Framework: Development of a coherent system of cross-references between documents that avoids redundancies while making interrelationships transparent.
💻 Technological Support and Accessibility:
•
Document Management System: Evaluation and implementation of suitable document management systems that efficiently support the entire document lifecycle and meet regulatory requirements.
•
Version Control and Change Tracking: Establishment of solid mechanisms for versioning and historisation of documents that ensure smooth traceability of changes.
•
Knowledge Management and Collaboration: Integration of collaboration functions and knowledge management tools that promote the joint creation and use of documents.
•
Intelligent Search Functions: Implementation of advanced search and retrieval mechanisms that enable rapid and targeted access to relevant documentation content.
How can we systematically plan and implement continuous improvements to our MaRisk compliance?
Continuous improvement is a fundamental principle of sustainable MaRisk compliance management. Given evolving regulatory requirements, changing business models, and increasing efficiency expectations, the systematic further development of your compliance structures and processes is critical to long-term success. ADVISORI supports you in establishing a structured continuous improvement approach for your MaRisk compliance.
🔄 Strategic Framework for Continuous Improvement:
•
Compliance Excellence Vision: Development of a clear, motivating target picture for your MaRisk compliance that goes beyond mere rule conformity and encompasses efficiency, effectiveness, and value contribution.
•
Maturity Model Approach: Implementation of a maturity model for various dimensions of your MaRisk compliance that assesses the current state, defines development targets, and makes progress measurable.
•
Innovation Framework: Establishment of a structured framework for the continuous identification, evaluation, and implementation of effective approaches in compliance management.
•
Resource Roadmap: Development of a long-term plan for the allocation of resources to improvement initiatives that takes into account both quick wins and strategic transformations.
📊 Systematic Analysis and Prioritisation:
•
Multi-Source Impulse Collection: Implementation of a systematic process for collecting improvement impulses from various sources such as audit findings, self-assessments, employee feedback, and external best practices.
•
Root Cause Analysis: Support in conducting in-depth analyses of the root causes of compliance weaknesses that go beyond symptomatic issues and enable sustainable solutions.
•
Impact-Effort Assessment: Development of a structured framework for evaluating and prioritising improvement initiatives based on their benefit, effort, and strategic relevance.
•
Portfolio Management: Establishment of a comprehensive portfolio approach for compliance improvement initiatives that takes into account dependencies, collaboration potential, and resource constraints.
🛠 ️ Methods and Tools for Effective Improvements:
•
Compliance Process Optimisation Toolkit: Provision of proven methods and tools for the analysis and optimisation of compliance processes, such as Process Mining, Value Stream Mapping, or Lean Management.
•
Hypothesis-Driven Approach: Support in developing and systematically testing hypotheses regarding improvement potential in order to promote data-based decision-making.
•
Pilot-and-Scale Methodology: Establishment of an approach that tests, validates, and optimises improvement ideas on a limited scale before they are rolled out broadly.
•
Best Practice Transfer: Support in the systematic transfer of proven practices from other areas, institutions, or industries, adapted to your specific framework conditions.
🧠 Cultural Embedding and Organisational Learning:
•
Continuous Improvement Mindset: Promotion of a culture that understands continuous improvement as an integral part of daily work and values proactive feedback and suggestions.
•
Lessons Learned Framework: Establishment of structured processes for the systematic review of experiences from projects, audits, and incidents as a basis for improvements.
•
Knowledge Sharing Mechanisms: Development of formats and platforms for the active exchange of knowledge, experiences, and best practices in the area of MaRisk compliance.
•
Change Enablement: Support in empowering the organisation to successfully adopt and embed changes through targeted communication, training, and engagement.
What are the critical success factors for sustainable MaRisk compliance, and how does ADVISORI support their implementation?
Sustainable MaRisk compliance requires more than the point-in-time fulfilment of regulatory requirements. It is based on a comprehensive approach that integrates technical, organisational, and cultural aspects and positions the compliance function as a strategic partner to the business. Drawing on many years of experience, ADVISORI has identified the critical success factors for sustainable MaRisk compliance and supports you in implementing them in a targeted manner.
🎯 Strategic Alignment and Governance:
•
Business Alignment: Support in strategically aligning the compliance function with business objectives, developing it from a pure control function into an enabler of sustainable business success.
•
Clear Governance: Design of transparent governance structures with unambiguous responsibilities, decision-making pathways, and accountability across all three lines of defence.
•
Management Commitment: Promotion of active commitment at leadership level that goes beyond verbal declarations and manifests in concrete action, resource allocation, and leading by example.
•
Integrated Management Approach: Development of a comprehensive approach that interlinks compliance management with other governance areas such as risk management and internal control.
🧠 Culture and Competencies:
•
Compliance Culture: Promotion of an enterprise-wide culture in which compliance is understood as a shared responsibility and integrated into everyday decisions and actions.
•
Qualification and Empowerment: Development of the required technical, methodological, and interpersonal competencies among compliance staff and business units through targeted development measures.
•
Open Communication: Establishment of an open communication culture in which compliance topics can be discussed constructively and potential issues addressed at an early stage.
•
Continuous Learning: Embedding of a learning culture that systematically learns from experiences, mistakes, and best practices and understands continuous improvement as a guiding principle.
📊 Efficient Processes and Methods:
•
Risk-Based Approach: Consistent alignment of all compliance activities with a differentiated risk assessment that concentrates limited resources on the most significant risk areas.
•
Process Integration: Smooth integration of compliance requirements into operational business processes, making compliance an integral component of day-to-day business.
•
Standardisation and Automation: Systematic standardisation and, where appropriate, automation of recurring compliance activities to increase efficiency, consistency, and quality.
•
Data-Driven Decision-Making: Establishment of data-based approaches for compliance decisions that complement and deepen subjective assessments with objective analyses.
🛠 ️ Sustainable Implementation and Continuous Improvement:
•
Change Management Excellence: Professional accompaniment of changes through structured change management that promotes acceptance and brings about sustainable changes in behaviour.
•
Effectiveness Review: Establishment of systematic mechanisms for regularly reviewing the effectiveness of compliance measures beyond mere conformity checks.
•
Agility and Adaptability: Development of flexible structures and processes that can continuously adapt to changing regulatory, business, and technological requirements.
•
Innovation Management: Systematic promotion and integration of effective approaches and technologies that make compliance management more efficient, effective, and value-generating.
Success Stories
Discover how we support companies in their digital transformation
Generative KI in der Fertigung
Bosch
KI-Prozessoptimierung für bessere Produktionseffizienz
Fallstudie
Ergebnisse
Reduzierung der Implementierungszeit von AI-Anwendungen auf wenige Wochen
Verbesserung der Produktqualität durch frühzeitige Fehlererkennung
Steigerung der Effizienz in der Fertigung durch reduzierte Downtime
AI Automatisierung in der Produktion
Festo
Intelligente Vernetzung für zukunftsfähige Produktionssysteme
Fallstudie
Ergebnisse
Verbesserung der Produktionsgeschwindigkeit und Flexibilität
Reduzierung der Herstellungskosten durch effizientere Ressourcennutzung
Erhöhung der Kundenzufriedenheit durch personalisierte Produkte
KI-gestützte Fertigungsoptimierung
Siemens
Smarte Fertigungslösungen für maximale Wertschöpfung
Fallstudie
Ergebnisse
Erhebliche Steigerung der Produktionsleistung
Reduzierung von Downtime und Produktionskosten
Verbesserung der Nachhaltigkeit durch effizientere Ressourcennutzung
Digitalisierung im Stahlhandel
Klöckner & Co
Digitalisierung im Stahlhandel
Fallstudie
Ergebnisse
Über 2 Milliarden Euro Umsatz jährlich über digitale Kanäle
Ziel, bis 2022 60% des Umsatzes online zu erzielen
Verbesserung der Kundenzufriedenheit durch automatisierte Prozesse
Let's
Work Together!
Is your organization ready for the next step into the digital future? Contact us for a personal consultation.
Your strategic success starts here
Our clients trust our expertise in digital transformation, compliance, and risk management
Ready for the next step?
Schedule a strategic consultation with our experts now
30 Minutes • Non-binding • Immediately available
For optimal preparation of your strategy session:
Your strategic goals and challenges
Desired business outcomes and ROI expectations
Current compliance and risk situation
Stakeholders and decision-makers in the project
Prefer direct contact?
Direct hotline for decision-makers
Strategic inquiries via email
Detailed Project Inquiry
For complex inquiries or if you want to provide specific information in advance