Systematic Identification of Security Vulnerabilities
Penetration Testing
Systematic identification and assessment of IT security vulnerabilities in your organization through simulated attack scenarios, conducted by experienced security experts.
- ✓Realistic assessment of your security posture through simulated attacks
- ✓Identification of complex security vulnerabilities that automated scans miss
- ✓Concrete risk assessment and practical recommendations
- ✓Fulfillment of regulatory requirements and industry standards
Your strategic success starts here
Our clients trust our expertise in digital transformation, compliance, and risk management
30 Minutes • Non-binding • Immediately available
For optimal preparation of your strategy session:
- Your strategic goals and objectives
- Desired business outcomes and ROI
- Steps already taken
Or contact us directly:
Certifications, Partners and more...
Comprehensive Security Assessment of Your IT Infrastructure
Our Strengths
- Experienced, certified penetration testers (OSCP, CEH, GPEN, etc.)
- Structured approach with clear documentation and recommendations
- Focus on practical risk assessment and business relevance
- Comprehensive experience with various industries and technologies
⚠
Expert Tip
Regular penetration tests are essential as the threat landscape continuously evolves and your IT environment constantly changes. An annual penetration test should be the minimum; for critical systems or after major changes, we recommend more frequent tests. The combination of regular automated vulnerability scans with periodic manual penetration tests provides the best protection for your IT infrastructure.
ADVISORI in Numbers
11+
Years of Experience
120+
Employees
520+
Projects
Our penetration testing process follows a structured approach that ranges from the planning phase to post-processing. We ensure that all tests are conducted in a controlled manner with minimal impact on your business operations.
Our Approach:
Preparation: Definition of scope, objectives, methodology, and framework conditions of the test
Information gathering: Systematic research and analysis of available information about the target environment
Vulnerability identification: Scanning and manual analysis of potential vulnerabilities
Exploitation: Controlled exploitation of identified vulnerabilities for risk assessment
Analysis and documentation: Comprehensive documentation of results, risk assessment, and recommendations
"Many companies underestimate how creative real attackers can be. An experienced penetration tester thinks like an attacker and combines various vulnerabilities that, when viewed individually, are often classified as minor, into critical attack paths. This way, we can uncover security gaps that are overlooked in standardized scans while simultaneously conveying a deeper understanding of actual security risks."
Sarah Richter
Head of Information Security, Cyber Security
Expertise & Experience:
10+ years of experience, CISA, CISM, Lead Auditor, DORA, NIS2, BCM, Cyber and Information Security
Our Services
We offer you tailored solutions for your digital transformation
Network Penetration Testing
Comprehensive security assessment of your network infrastructure, including firewalls, routers, switches, and other network components. We identify vulnerabilities in network configuration, inadequately protected services, and potential entry points for attackers.
- Analysis of network architecture and segmentation
- Testing of network devices and services for vulnerabilities
- Identification of configuration errors and insecure protocols
- Assessment of network security measures and access controls
Web Application Penetration Testing
Thorough security assessment of your web applications according to OWASP Top 10 and other best practices. We examine your applications for vulnerabilities such as injection attacks, cross-site scripting, insecure authentication, and other common security issues.
- Testing for OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities and beyond
- Analysis of authentication, authorization, and session management
- Verification of input validation and output encoding
- Assessment of application logic and business-specific vulnerabilities
Mobile Application Penetration Testing
Comprehensive security assessment of your iOS and Android applications on both client and server side. We analyze mobile apps for vulnerabilities such as insecure data storage, insufficient transport protection, and faulty cryptography.
- Static and dynamic analysis of the mobile application
- Verification of client-server communication
- Analysis of local data storage and cryptography
- Assessment of platform-specific security mechanisms
Red Team Assessments
Comprehensive, goal-oriented attack simulations that combine multiple attack vectors to test your organization's resilience against real threats. Red Team Assessments go beyond traditional penetration tests and simulate the tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) of real attackers.
- Goal-oriented approach with defined target objectives
- Combination of various attack vectors (technical, physical, social)
- Emulation of real attacker groups and their tactics
- Assessment of detection and response capabilities of your security team
Looking for a complete overview of all our services?
View Complete Service OverviewOur Areas of Expertise in Information Security
Discover our specialized areas of information security
Frequently Asked Questions about Penetration Testing
What is Penetration Testing and how does it differ from other security tests?
Penetration Testing is a systematic method for assessing IT security through simulated attacks conducted by qualified security experts under controlled conditions. Unlike other security tests, the focus is on actively identifying and exploiting vulnerabilities to demonstrate their actual exploitability and risk potential.
🔍 Essential Characteristics of Penetration Testing:
•
Manual Expertise: Combination of automated tools and human intelligence, creativity, and experience.
•
Exploitation: Actual, controlled exploitation of vulnerabilities (not just theoretical identification).
•
Attacker Perspective: Simulation of real attack methods and tactics.
•
Contextualization: Assessment of vulnerabilities in the specific business context.
•
Evidence-based: Concrete proof of vulnerability exploitability.
🔄 Differences from Other Security Tests:
•
Vulnerability Scanning: Automated identification of known vulnerabilities without active exploitation; faster and broader, but with more false positives and less depth.
•
Security Audit: Systematic review against predefined requirements and standards; focused on compliance and best practices, not on current attack methods.
•
Security Assessment: Broader evaluation of security posture encompassing technical, organizational, and procedural aspects.
•
Bug Bounty: Crowd-based search for vulnerabilities by external security researchers; continuous but less structured and methodical.
🎯 Typical Objectives of a Penetration Test:
•
Identification of vulnerabilities overlooked by automated scans.
•
Validation of actual exploitability of identified vulnerabilities.
•
Assessment of effectiveness of security controls and measures in real attack scenarios.
•
Demonstration of complex attack paths through combination of multiple vulnerabilities.
•
Verification of detection and response capabilities of security teams.
📋 Core Components of Professional Penetration Testing:
•
Clear scope definition and authorization (Rules of Engagement).
•
Structured methodology according to recognized standards (OWASP, PTES, OSSTMM).
•
Different testing approaches: Black Box (no prior information), Grey Box (partial information), or White Box (complete information).
•
Comprehensive documentation with reproducible results and concrete recommendations.
•
Risk assessment based on exploitability, severity, and business context.
⚙ ️ Types of Penetration Tests by Target Focus:
•
Network Penetration Testing: Testing of network infrastructure, firewalls, routers, and servers.
•
Web Application Penetration Testing: Examination of web applications for vulnerabilities like OWASP Top 10.
•
Mobile Application Testing: Security assessment of iOS and Android applications.
•
Social Engineering: Assessment of the human factor through phishing or physical access tests.
•
Red Team Assessment: Comprehensive, goal-oriented attack simulation with multiple attack vectors.
How does a professional penetration test proceed?
A professional penetration test follows a structured, methodical approach consisting of several phases. The entire process is carefully planned and executed from initial planning to final reporting to ensure maximum value with minimal risks to operational business.
🔄 Typical Phases of a Penetration Test:
📋 1. Preparation and Planning Phase:
•
Scope Definition: Determination of systems, applications, and networks to be tested.
•
Objective Definition: Specification of specific goals and expectations for the test.
•
Rules of Engagement: Agreement on test conditions, time windows, and restrictions.
•
Risk Assessment: Identification of potential test risks and planning of countermeasures.
•
Organizational Preparation: Informing relevant stakeholders and preparations for emergency measures.
🔍 2. Information Gathering (Reconnaissance):
•
Passive Reconnaissance: Collection of publicly available information without direct interaction with target systems.
•
Active Reconnaissance: Direct interaction with target systems to gather technical information.
•
OSINT (Open Source Intelligence): Use of public sources for information gathering.
•
Footprinting: Creation of a detailed profile of the target environment and potential attack points.
•
Network Mapping: Identification of active systems, open ports, and running services.
🔎 3. Vulnerability Analysis:
•
Vulnerability Scanning: Use of specialized tools to identify known vulnerabilities.
•
Manual Testing: Manual verification and validation of identified vulnerabilities.
•
False Positive Elimination: Exclusion of incorrectly identified vulnerabilities.
•
Configuration Review: Analysis of configurations for security deficiencies.
•
Code Review (if in scope): Manual or automated review of source code for security gaps.
⚡ 4. Exploitation (Exploitation of Vulnerabilities):
•
Exploitation Planning: Development of a strategy for controlled exploitation of identified vulnerabilities.
•
Vulnerability Validation: Confirmation of actual exploitability of vulnerabilities.
•
Privilege Escalation: Attempt to gain higher privileges in the system.
•
Lateral Movement: Spreading within the network after initial access.
•
Persistence Testing: Testing possibilities to establish long-term access.
🎯 5. Post-Exploitation and Risk Assessment:
•
Access Evaluation: Assessment of gained access and potential impacts.
•
Data Exfiltration Testing: Verification of controls to prevent data theft.
•
Business Impact Assessment: Assessment of business impacts of successful exploits.
•
Evidence Collection: Careful documentation of all activities and results.
•
Clean-up: Removal of all test artifacts and restoration of original system state.
📊 6. Analysis and Reporting:
•
Findings Classification: Categorization of results by severity and risk.
•
Risk Assessment: Evaluation of identified vulnerabilities in business context.
•
Remediation Planning: Development of prioritized recommendations for vulnerability remediation.
•
Report Generation: Creation of detailed report with technical details and management summary.
•
Findings Presentation: Presentation of results and recommendations for technical teams and management.
🔄 7. Remediation and Re-Testing (optional):
•
Remediation Support: Support in remediation of identified vulnerabilities.
•
Validation Testing: Verification of successful implementation of remediation measures.
•
Knowledge Transfer: Knowledge transfer to improve security practices.
•
Continuous Improvement: Integration of findings into continuous security improvements.
•
Follow-up Testing: Planning of future tests to validate long-term improvements.
What are the different types of penetration tests?
Penetration tests can be categorized in different ways – by knowledge level, target focus, or perspective. The choice of the appropriate testing approach depends on your specific security objectives, the maturity level of your security measures, and the assets to be protected.
🔍 Categorization by Knowledge Level (Testing Approach):
•
Black Box Testing: - Tester has minimal or no prior information about the target environment - Simulates an external attacker without insider knowledge - Advantages: Realistic simulation of external threats, uncovers easily exploitable vulnerabilities - Disadvantages: More time-consuming, may miss hidden or complex vulnerabilities
•
Grey Box Testing: - Tester has limited knowledge about the target environment (e.g., network diagrams, user accounts) - Simulates an attacker with partial insider knowledge or privileged access - Advantages: More efficient than Black Box, deeper analysis possible, balances realism and efficiency - Disadvantages: Less comprehensive than White Box, not fully realistic like Black Box
•
White Box Testing: - Tester has complete information (architecture, source code, configurations, etc.) - Enables in-depth analysis and identification of complex vulnerabilities - Advantages: Most comprehensive vulnerability identification, efficient, thorough - Disadvantages: Less realistic regarding typical external attacks
🎯 Categorization by Target Focus (Target Type):
•
Network Penetration Testing: - Focus: Network infrastructure, firewalls, routers, servers, network services - Goal: Identification of vulnerabilities in network architecture and configuration - Typical Vulnerabilities: Misconfigurations, insecure protocols, outdated software, weak passwords
•
Web Application Penetration Testing: - Focus: Web applications, APIs, web services - Goal: Uncovering security vulnerabilities in web applications according to OWASP Top
10 and beyond
•
Typical Vulnerabilities: Injection, XSS, CSRF, insecure authentication, faulty access controls
•
Mobile Application Penetration Testing: - Focus: Mobile apps for iOS, Android, and other platforms - Goal: Identification of vulnerabilities in mobile applications and their backend systems - Typical Vulnerabilities: Insecure data storage, missing transport encryption, client-side injection
•
IoT/OT Penetration Testing: - Focus: Internet of Things devices, Operational Technology, industrial control systems - Goal: Security assessment of specialized hardware and embedded systems - Typical Vulnerabilities: Weak authentication, unencrypted communication, missing updates
•
Cloud Penetration Testing: - Focus: Cloud infrastructure, platforms, and services - Goal: Identification of vulnerabilities in cloud configurations and deployments - Typical Vulnerabilities: Misconfigurations, overly permissive permissions, insecure APIs
👥 Categorization by Perspective (Testing Perspective):
•
External Penetration Testing: - Simulation of an attacker from outside the corporate network - Focus on Internet-facing systems and access points - Goal: Assessment of external security perimeter
•
Internal Penetration Testing: - Simulation of an attacker within the corporate network - Focus on internal systems, segmentation, and access controls - Goal: Assessment of internal security measures and damage containment capabilities
•
Social Engineering Testing: - Simulation of non-technical attacks on human vulnerabilities - Includes phishing, pretexting, physical access tests, etc. - Goal: Assessment of security awareness and resilience against manipulative tactics
🔄 Special Forms of Penetration Testing:
•
Red Team Assessment: - Comprehensive, goal-oriented attack simulation with multiple vectors - Longer timeframe (weeks or months) with minimal advance notice - Goal: Realistic assessment of detection and defense capabilities
•
Purple Team Exercise: - Collaborative approach between attackers (Red Team) and defenders (Blue Team) - Focus on knowledge transfer and mutual learning - Goal: Improvement of both attack and defense capabilities
When and how often should penetration tests be conducted?
The optimal frequency of penetration tests depends on various factors, including the criticality of your systems, regulatory requirements, change rates in your IT environment, and your overall risk profile. A well-thought-out strategy for regular testing is crucial to ensure continuous security posture.
🔄 Basic Recommendations for Testing Frequency:
•
Minimum Standard: Annual penetration tests for critical systems and applications
•
Quarterly Tests: For highly critical systems or environments with high change rates
•
Event-based Tests: After significant changes to infrastructure or applications
•
Continuous Testing: Supplementary use of bug bounty programs or continuous security testing
📅 Suitable Occasions for Additional Penetration Tests:
•
Significant Infrastructure Changes: Network redesigns, new data centers, cloud migration
•
Major Application Changes: New features, fundamental code changes, architecture adjustments
•
Introduction of New Technologies: Implementation of new platforms, frameworks, or systems
•
Organizational Changes: Mergers, acquisitions, outsourcing of essential IT functions
•
Relevant Security Incidents: After security breaches or discovered vulnerabilities in similar systems
•
New Compliance Requirements: Changes in regulatory requirements or certification demands
🔍 Factors Influencing Optimal Testing Frequency:
•
Risk Profile: Higher risk requires more frequent testing (e.g., financial institutions, healthcare)
•
Compliance Requirements: Some regulations like PCI DSS explicitly require regular testing
•
Change Frequency: Environments with frequent changes need more frequent reviews
•
Previous Test Results: History of critical vulnerabilities suggests more frequent testing
•
Security Maturity: Less mature organizations benefit from more frequent testing and coaching
•
Threat Landscape: Specific threats to your industry may require more frequent testing
🌐 Test Scope and Rotation Strategy:
•
Complete Tests: Comprehensive testing of all critical systems (typically annually)
•
Rotating Tests: Systematic rotation through different systems with each test
•
Focused Tests: Concentration on the most critical or most exposed systems
•
Depth vs. Breadth: Balancing between in-depth testing of individual systems and broader coverage
•
Risk-oriented Prioritization: More frequent and deeper testing for higher-risk systems
📊 Integration into Security Lifecycle:
•
Vulnerability Management: Supplementing regular vulnerability scans with periodic penetration tests
•
SDLC Integration: Incorporation of penetration tests into the Software Development Lifecycle
•
Security Program: Embedding in a comprehensive security program with various testing methods
•
Continuous Testing: Supplementing with continuous security testing in the DevSecOps model
•
Follow-up Testing: Targeted retests to validate successful remediation of identified vulnerabilities
⚖ ️ Balanced Approach for Continuous Security:
•
Combined Use of Different Testing Methods: Automated scans, manual penetration tests, code reviews
•
Risk-based Test Planning: Adaptation of frequency and scope to specific risk profile
•
Periodic Reassessment: Regular review and adjustment of testing strategy
•
Documented Testing Strategy: Clear definition of test intervals, scope, and objectives
•
Consideration of Return on Investment: Optimization of security benefit in relation to costs
What should be considered when selecting a penetration testing service provider?
Selecting the right penetration testing service provider is crucial for the quality and value of test results. An experienced, professional provider can make the difference between a superficial review and an in-depth security analysis that uncovers actual risks and identifies concrete improvement opportunities.
🔍 Essential Qualifications and Certifications:
•
Individual Certifications: Recognized qualifications such as OSCP, OSCE, GPEN, GXPN, CEH, or comparable.
•
Company Certifications: ISO 27001, CREST, CHECK, or other industry-specific accreditations.
•
Industry Experience: Proven experience in your specific industry and with similar IT environments.
•
References: Verifiable customer reviews and case studies from organizations of comparable size and industry.
•
Memberships: Active participation in relevant security communities and organizations (e.g., OWASP).
🛠 ️ Technical Competence and Methodology:
•
Comprehensive Methodology: Clear, structured approach based on recognized standards (PTES, OWASP, OSSTMM).
•
Tool Expertise: Experience with and access to professional penetration testing tools and technologies.
•
Manual Expertise: Strong focus on manual testing beyond automated scanning procedures.
•
Current Technology Competence: Expertise in relevant technologies such as cloud, containers, IoT, or mobile platforms.
•
Research and Development: Continuous research on new vulnerabilities and attack techniques.
📊 Reporting and Value Creation:
•
Thorough Documentation: Detailed, well-structured reports with clear action recommendations.
•
Business Context: Ability to assess technical vulnerabilities in the context of your business.
•
Prioritization: Meaningful risk assessment and prioritization of identified vulnerabilities.
•
Implementation-oriented: Concrete, practical recommendations for vulnerability remediation.
•
Debriefing: Willingness to present and explain results for various stakeholders.
⚖ ️ Legal and Contractual Aspects:
•
Clear Confidentiality Agreements (NDAs): Comprehensive non-disclosure agreements to protect sensitive information.
•
Liability Insurance: Adequate insurance coverage for penetration testing activities.
•
Indemnification: Clear agreements on liability for possible disruptions or damages.
•
Unambiguous Contract Design: Precise definition of scope, timeframe, deliverables, and responsibilities.
•
Compliance Conformity: Proven experience with relevant regulatory requirements (GDPR, PCI DSS, etc.).
👥 Communication and Collaboration:
•
Clear Points of Contact: Dedicated technical and project management contacts.
•
Transparent Communication: Proactive updates during the testing process.
•
Flexibility: Willingness to address your specific requirements and concerns.
•
Availability: Reliable contact options, especially in critical situations.
•
Cultural Fit: Compatibility with your corporate culture and working style.
🔄 Project Process and Follow-up:
•
Structured Process: Clear project plan from preparation to completion.
•
Response Speed: Quick escalation of critical vulnerabilities during the test.
•
Post-support: Support in interpreting results and remediating vulnerabilities.
•
Validation Tests: Offering of retests to verify successful remediation measures.
•
Long-term Partnership: Interest in a continuous security partnership rather than one-time service.
🚫 Warning Signs in Provider Selection:
•
Excessive use of automated tools without substantial manual testing.
•
Unrealistically low prices or extremely short test duration for complex environments.
•
Lack of transparency regarding methodology, tools, or tester qualifications.
•
Missing or insufficient references and case studies.
•
Standardized "one-size-fits-all" approaches without adaptation to your specific requirements.
What legal aspects must be considered during penetration tests?
Penetration tests operate in a sensitive legal area as they deliberately uncover and exploit security vulnerabilities in IT systems. To minimize legal risks and meet compliance requirements, various legal aspects must be carefully considered.
📜 Basic Legal Prerequisites:
•
Written Authorization: Explicit, documented permission from the system owner before test begins.
•
Scope Definition: Precise definition of systems, methods, and time windows to be tested.
•
Rules of Engagement: Clear specification of permitted and prohibited activities during the test.
•
Emergency Contacts: Documented escalation paths for critical situations or unintended impacts.
•
Confidentiality Agreements: Comprehensive NDAs to protect sensitive information and test results.
⚖ ️ Relevant Legal Areas and Regulations:
•
Computer and Cybercrime Laws: National laws such as German Criminal Code (§§ 202a, 202b, 202c, 303a, 303b) or international equivalents.
•
Data Protection Law: GDPR compliance for tests that may involve personal data.
•
Contract Law: Clear contractual arrangements between client and penetration testing service provider.
•
Telecommunications Law: Compliance when testing telecommunications infrastructures or services.
•
Industry-specific Regulations: Additional requirements in regulated industries such as finance or healthcare.
🌐 Cross-jurisdictional Aspects:
•
Cross-border Tests: Compliance with different legal systems for internationally distributed systems.
•
Cloud Environments: Clarification of legal situation for tests on cloud infrastructures with various locations.
•
Multiple Stakeholders: Obtaining permissions from all relevant parties (e.g., hosting providers, cloud providers).
•
Different Regulatory Frameworks: Compliance with different regulatory requirements in various countries.
•
International Standards: Orientation to internationally recognized methods and best practices.
🛡 ️ Data Protection and Compliance:
•
GDPR Compliance: Ensuring tests meet General Data Protection Regulation requirements.
•
Minimal Data Insight: Avoiding unnecessary access to personal or sensitive data.
•
Data Security: Secure handling, storage, and transmission of all data collected during testing.
•
Documentation: Demonstrable compliance with data protection requirements throughout the testing process.
•
Data Protection Impact Assessment: Conducting DPIA if necessary before tests on data protection-critical systems.
📋 Contractual Safeguards:
•
Liability Limitations: Clear definition of liability for possible damages or business interruptions.
•
Insurance Coverage: Verification of adequate insurance coverage by the penetration testing service provider.
•
Indemnification: Agreements on indemnification from liability for contract-compliant execution.
•
Service Description: Detailed description of test scope, methodology, and deliverables.
•
Escalation Processes: Documented procedures for handling critical situations or disagreements.
⚠ ️ Special Risk Areas:
•
Social Engineering: Specific legal and ethical considerations for tests involving employee manipulation.
•
Physical Penetration Testing: Additional legal aspects for tests with physical access to buildings or facilities.
•
DoS/DDoS Simulations: Special caution and clear restrictions for availability tests.
•
Production Systems: Increased legal duty of care for tests on business-critical systems.
•
Third-party Systems: Necessity of explicit permissions also from connected third-party providers.
📝 Documentation and Evidence:
•
Complete Documentation: Careful recording of all test activities and results.
•
Audit Trail: Traceable logging of all actions performed during the test.
•
Formal Acceptance: Documented confirmation of proper test execution and completion.
•
Security Concept: Integration of penetration tests into organization-wide security concept.
•
Compliance Evidence: Documentation for fulfilling regulatory requirements through regular testing.
What are typical vulnerabilities discovered during penetration tests?
During penetration tests, certain categories of vulnerabilities are regularly identified that are found in many organizations. Knowledge of these common security gaps enables proactive hardening and targeted improvement of security posture before they can be exploited by real attackers.
🔓 Network Security Vulnerabilities:
•
Outdated Software and Missing Patches: Known security vulnerabilities in non-updated systems and applications.
•
Insecure Network Configurations: Misconfigured firewalls, routers, and switches that enable unauthorized access.
•
Open Ports and Unnecessary Services: Unneeded but active services that increase the attack surface.
•
Weak or Default Passwords: Easily guessable or factory default credentials for systems and devices.
•
Missing Network Segmentation: Insufficient separation of critical systems from the general network.
🌐 Web Application Vulnerabilities (according to OWASP Top 10):
•
Injection Vulnerabilities: SQL, NoSQL, OS, or LDAP injection enabling unauthorized data access.
•
Broken Authentication: Faulty implementation of authentication mechanisms.
•
Sensitive Data Exposure: Insufficient protection of sensitive data in transmission or storage.
•
XML External Entities (XXE): Attacks on XML parsers in web applications.
•
Broken Access Control: Inadequate access controls allowing unauthorized access to functions or data.
•
Security Misconfiguration: Insecure default configurations, incomplete setups, or open cloud storage.
•
Cross-Site Scripting (XSS): Injection of malicious code into trusted websites.
•
Insecure Deserialization: Attacks through manipulated serialized objects.
•
Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities: Use of components with known security vulnerabilities.
•
Insufficient Logging & Monitoring: Inadequate detection and response to active attacks.
📱 Mobile Application Vulnerabilities:
•
Insecure Data Storage: Sensitive data stored unencrypted on the device.
•
Weak Server-side Controls: Insufficient validation and security measures on the server side.
•
Insecure Communication: Unencrypted or weakly encrypted data transmission.
•
Faulty Authentication: Weak or bypassable authentication mechanisms.
•
Insufficient Cryptography: Use of outdated or insecure cryptographic methods.
•
Client-side Injection: Vulnerability to code injection on the client side.
☁ ️ Cloud-specific Vulnerabilities:
•
Misconfigured Cloud Services: Improperly secured S
3 buckets, databases, or other cloud resources.
•
Excessive Permissions: Overly generous IAM rights violating the principle of least privilege.
•
Missing Tenant Separation: Insufficient isolation between different customers in multi-tenant environments.
•
Insecure APIs: Vulnerabilities in cloud APIs that can enable unauthorized access.
•
Missing Cloud Security Monitoring: Insufficient monitoring and alerting for cloud resources.
👥 Human and Organizational Vulnerabilities:
•
Susceptibility to Social Engineering: Employees falling for phishing attacks or other manipulation techniques.
•
Insufficient Security Awareness: Lack of understanding of security risks and practices.
•
Weak Security Policies: Missing or inadequately enforced security policies.
•
Insider Threats: Risks from employees with legitimate access rights.
•
Physical Security Gaps: Insufficient protection of buildings, server rooms, or workplaces.
🔒 Identity and Access Management Vulnerabilities:
•
Insufficient Password Policies: Lack of enforcement of complex passwords or regular password changes.
•
Missing Multi-Factor Authentication: Omission of additional authentication factors for critical systems.
•
Excessive Permissions: Access to resources not required for task fulfillment.
•
Missing Access Reviews: Insufficient regular review and cleanup of access rights.
•
Privileged Account Management: Vulnerabilities in management of accounts with extended rights.
🧪 DevOps and CI/CD Vulnerabilities:
•
Insecure Code Repositories: Unprotected source code repositories with hardcoded secrets.
•
CI/CD Pipeline Vulnerabilities: Security gaps in automated build and deployment processes.
•
Container Security Issues: Vulnerabilities in container images or their orchestration.
•
Infrastructure as Code (IaC) Weaknesses: Security issues in automated infrastructure definitions.
•
Missing Security Tests in Development Process: Insufficient integration of security checks in the SDLC.
How is the ROI of penetration tests measured?
Measuring the Return on Investment (ROI) for penetration tests is an important but challenging task. Unlike revenue-increasing measures, the value of penetration tests lies primarily in avoiding potential costs and risks. A thoughtful approach to ROI consideration helps quantify and communicate the business value of this important security measure.
💰 Basic ROI Consideration for Penetration Tests:
•
Costs for Penetration Tests: Direct expenses for external service providers or internal resources.
•
Avoided Costs through Risk Mitigation: Reduction of probability and/or impact of security incidents.
•
Savings through Early Detection: Remediation of vulnerabilities before possible exploitation is more cost-effective.
•
Increased Efficiency: Targeted prioritization of security measures based on actual risks.
•
Long-term Value Creation: Continuous improvement of security posture beyond individual tests.
📊 Quantitative Approaches to ROI Measurement:
•
Annual Loss Expectancy (ALE) Model: - ALE = Probability of occurrence × potential damage amount - Comparison of ALE before and after penetration tests and remediation measures - ROI = (reduced ALE - costs for pentests and remediation) / costs for pentests and remediation
•
Breach Cost Reduction: - Estimation of average costs of a security incident (based on industry data like IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report) - Assessment of risk reduction through identified and remediated vulnerabilities - ROI = (avoided costs × risk reduction - investment) / investment
•
Risk-Adjusted Return: - Assessment of different risk scenarios with different probabilities of occurrence - Calculation of expected benefit across different scenarios - Comparison with a baseline scenario without penetration tests
📈 Qualitative Value Aspects (difficult to quantify but important):
•
Compliance Fulfillment: Avoidance of fines and regulatory sanctions.
•
Reputation Protection: Preservation of company reputation and customer trust.
•
Competitive Advantage: Differentiation through demonstrable security measures.
•
Improved Security Culture: Awareness and training through penetration testing insights.
•
Early Warning System: Identification of security issues before exploitation by real attackers.
🔍 Performance Indicators for Penetration Testing Effectiveness:
•
Vulnerability Remediation Rate: Percentage of remediated vulnerabilities by severity.
•
Mean Time to Remediate: Average time until remediation of identified vulnerabilities.
•
Reduction in Critical Findings: Decrease in critical vulnerabilities across multiple penetration tests.
•
Security Debt Reduction: Reduction of "security debt" backlog over time.
•
Coverage Improvement: Increase in assets and systems covered by security testing.
⚖ ️ ROI Optimization Strategies:
•
Risk-oriented Test Planning: Focus on systems with highest business risk.
•
Integrated Testing Strategy: Combination of penetration tests with other security measures.
•
Automation and Reuse: Use of automated components for repeatable tests.
•
Knowledge Transfer: Knowledge transfer to internal teams to strengthen own security capabilities.
•
Continuous Improvement: Building a maturity model for gradual security improvement.
📝 Practical Approaches to ROI Documentation:
•
Executive Dashboards: Visual representation of security metrics and their business value.
•
Trend Analyses: Proof of continuous improvement of security posture over time.
•
Peer Comparison: Benchmarking against industry averages or best practices.
•
Success Stories: Documentation of concrete cases where critical vulnerabilities were discovered before exploitation.
•
Total Cost of Security: Holistic view of all security costs in relation to risk reduction.
🚫 Avoiding Common Pitfalls in ROI Calculation:
•
Neglecting long-term benefits in favor of short-term cost considerations.
•
Underestimating actual costs of security incidents (including indirect costs).
•
Overemphasis on quantitative metrics while neglecting qualitative aspects.
•
Unrealistic assumptions regarding probability of occurrence of security incidents.
•
Missing consideration of overall security context of an organization.
How do Web Application Penetration Tests differ from other penetration tests?
Web Application Penetration Tests are specialized security assessments that specifically focus on the security of web applications. They differ from other penetration tests in their specific focus, methodology, and the types of vulnerabilities they aim to uncover.
🌐 Specific Focus and Objectives:
•
Application Logic: Testing of business logic implemented in the application for security vulnerabilities.
•
Client-Server Interaction: Examination of communication between browser and server for manipulation possibilities.
•
Session Management: Assessment of mechanisms for managing user sessions.
•
Frontend Security: Analysis of client-side code (HTML, CSS, JavaScript) for vulnerabilities.
•
Backend Processes: Verification of server-side processing and data validation.
🔍 Methodological Peculiarities:
•
OWASP Orientation: Alignment with OWASP Top
10 and OWASP Testing Guide as standard reference.
•
Dynamic and Static Analysis: Combination of runtime tests with code reviews for comprehensive security assessment.
•
Authenticated Tests: Conducting tests both without and with various user permissions.
•
API Focus: Special attention to REST, SOAP, and GraphQL APIs as critical components of modern web applications.
•
Browser-based Attacks: Specific testing for client-side attack vectors like XSS and CSRF.
🛠 ️ Specific Testing Techniques and Tools:
•
Specialized Scanners: Use of web-specific scanning tools like OWASP ZAP, Burp Suite, or Acunetix.
•
Proxy Interception: Intercepting and manipulating traffic between browser and server.
•
Cookie Manipulation: Targeted tests for manipulating session cookies and other browser storage mechanisms.
•
Browser Developer Tools: Use of browser development tools for analyzing client behavior.
•
Web Framework-specific Tests: Adaptation of tests to specific frameworks like React, Angular, Laravel, Django, etc.
🎯 Typical Vulnerabilities in Web Applications:
•
Injection Vulnerabilities: SQL, NoSQL, OS Command, LDAP injection to bypass data filters.
•
Cross-Site Scripting (XSS): Injection of JavaScript into trusted websites for execution in victim's browser.
•
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF): Exploitation of trust relationship between browser and website.
•
Broken Authentication: Deficiencies in authentication mechanisms enabling unauthorized access.
•
Broken Access Controls: Insufficient enforcement of access permissions for functions or data.
•
Security Misconfiguration: Misconfigurations in web servers, applications, databases, or frameworks.
•
Insecure Direct Object References: Direct access to internal implementation objects without access control.
•
Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS) Misconfiguration: Misconfigured policies for cross-domain requests.
📊 Phases of a Web Application Penetration Test:
•
Reconnaissance: Information gathering about the web application, technologies used, and architectures.
•
Mapping: Identification of all application functions, input and output points, workflows, and APIs.
•
Discovery: Automated and manual search for vulnerabilities in application logic and structure.
•
Exploitation: Controlled exploitation of found vulnerabilities to assess actual risk.
•
Reporting: Detailed documentation of results with clear reproduction steps and remediation recommendations.
⚖ ️ Relevant Compliance Standards:
•
PCI DSS: Explicit requirements for regular web application penetration tests when processing credit card data.
•
GDPR: Implicit requirement to ensure security of personal data in web applications.
•
ISO 27001: Recommendation of regular security tests as part of information security management.
•
HIPAA: Necessity of securing web applications processing health data.
•
BAIT/KAIT/VAIT: Supervisory requirements for web-based applications in regulated industries.
🔄 Integration into Development Cycle:
•
Shift-Left Approach: Integration of security tests early in the development process.
•
CI/CD Integration: Automated security tests as part of the Continuous Integration pipeline.
•
DevSecOps: Anchoring web application security in agile development processes.
•
Continuous Validation: Regular verification after updates or changes to the application.
•
Security Champions: Integration of security experts in development teams for continuous awareness.
What is the difference between a penetration test and a vulnerability assessment?
Penetration Tests and Vulnerability Assessments are two complementary but different approaches to assessing IT security. While both aim to identify security vulnerabilities, they differ fundamentally in depth, methodology, objectives, and required resources. Understanding these differences is crucial to selecting the right method for your specific security needs.
🎯 Basic Objectives:
•
Vulnerability Assessment: - Broad, comprehensive identification of as many vulnerabilities as possible - Systematic cataloging and prioritization of security gaps - Focus on completeness and regular execution - Goal: Comprehensive overview of security posture
•
Penetration Test: - Simulation of real attacks to validate actual exploitability of vulnerabilities - Assessment of potential impacts of successful attacks - Focus on depth and realistic attack paths - Goal: Assessment of actual resilience against attacks
🧰 Methodology and Depth:
•
Vulnerability Assessment: - Primarily automated scans with specialized tools - Systematic, checklist-based approach - Identification of known vulnerabilities against extensive databases - Limited manual verification, mostly to reduce false positives - Lower depth, but broader coverage
•
Penetration Test: - Combination of automated tools and extensive manual testing - Creative, attacker-like approach - Active exploitation of vulnerabilities under controlled conditions - Chaining of multiple vulnerabilities into complex attack paths - High depth with specific focus
⏱ ️ Timeframe and Frequency:
•
Vulnerability Assessment: - Relatively short period (days to few weeks) - Regular execution (monthly, quarterly) - Part of continuous security monitoring process - Repeatable and comparable over time - Scalable to large environments
•
Penetration Test: - Longer timeframe (weeks) - Less frequent execution (semi-annually, annually) - Event-based for major changes or new systems - Individual and less standardized - Typically focused on critical or exposed systems
📊 Results and Reporting:
•
Vulnerability Assessment: - Structured lists of identified vulnerabilities - Categorization by severity, often based on CVSS - Detailed technical descriptions - Standardized remediation recommendations - Quantitative metrics for tracking security status
•
Penetration Test: - Narrative description of attack paths and methods - Demonstration of impacts of successful exploits - Business context-related risk assessment - Tailored recommendations based on specific environment - Qualitative assessment of security posture
💼 Resources and Expertise:
•
Vulnerability Assessment: - Can be performed with lower specialization level - More reliant on tools and automated processes - Typically lower costs - Can be partially performed internally with appropriate training - Requires less specialized attack knowledge
•
Penetration Test: - Requires highly specialized security experts with attack knowledge - Combination of technical skills, creativity, and experience - Typically higher costs - Often external execution for unbiased perspective - Requires comprehensive knowledge of current attack techniques
🔄 Ideal Use Cases and Combination:
•
Vulnerability Assessment ideal for: - Regular, broad security reviews - Fulfillment of basic compliance requirements - Monitoring of general security status - Identification of obvious or known vulnerabilities - Preparation for targeted penetration tests
•
Penetration Test ideal for: - Validation of actual security posture - Assessment of resilience of critical systems - Verification of effectiveness of security measures - Fulfillment of specific regulatory requirements - Identification of complex, non-trivial security vulnerabilities
•
Optimal Combination of Both Approaches: - Regular vulnerability assessments as baseline - Targeted penetration tests for critical systems - Vulnerability assessment to prepare focused penetration test - Penetration tests to validate vulnerability assessment results - Integrated approach within comprehensive security program
Success Stories
Discover how we support companies in their digital transformation
Generative KI in der Fertigung
Bosch
KI-Prozessoptimierung für bessere Produktionseffizienz
Fallstudie
Ergebnisse
Reduzierung der Implementierungszeit von AI-Anwendungen auf wenige Wochen
Verbesserung der Produktqualität durch frühzeitige Fehlererkennung
Steigerung der Effizienz in der Fertigung durch reduzierte Downtime
AI Automatisierung in der Produktion
Festo
Intelligente Vernetzung für zukunftsfähige Produktionssysteme
Fallstudie
Ergebnisse
Verbesserung der Produktionsgeschwindigkeit und Flexibilität
Reduzierung der Herstellungskosten durch effizientere Ressourcennutzung
Erhöhung der Kundenzufriedenheit durch personalisierte Produkte
KI-gestützte Fertigungsoptimierung
Siemens
Smarte Fertigungslösungen für maximale Wertschöpfung
Fallstudie
Ergebnisse
Erhebliche Steigerung der Produktionsleistung
Reduzierung von Downtime und Produktionskosten
Verbesserung der Nachhaltigkeit durch effizientere Ressourcennutzung
Digitalisierung im Stahlhandel
Klöckner & Co
Digitalisierung im Stahlhandel
Fallstudie
Ergebnisse
Über 2 Milliarden Euro Umsatz jährlich über digitale Kanäle
Ziel, bis 2022 60% des Umsatzes online zu erzielen
Verbesserung der Kundenzufriedenheit durch automatisierte Prozesse
Let's
Work Together!
Is your organization ready for the next step into the digital future? Contact us for a personal consultation.
Your strategic success starts here
Our clients trust our expertise in digital transformation, compliance, and risk management
Ready for the next step?
Schedule a strategic consultation with our experts now
30 Minutes • Non-binding • Immediately available
For optimal preparation of your strategy session:
Your strategic goals and challenges
Desired business outcomes and ROI expectations
Current compliance and risk situation
Stakeholders and decision-makers in the project
Prefer direct contact?
Direct hotline for decision-makers
Strategic inquiries via email
Detailed Project Inquiry
For complex inquiries or if you want to provide specific information in advance
